
DirectDemocracyS
— Global Political Organization —
POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC PROGRAM
FINANCIAL AND SOCIAL FOR SPAIN
Critical analysis of reality · Comprehensive diagnosis · Concrete and verifiable solutions
Based on the principles of:
Logic · Common sense · Study · Reality · Truth · Coherence · Mutual respect
Version 1.0 — 2025/2026
directdemocracys.org
PRELIMINARY NOTE
This document is the political, economic, financial, and social program that DirectDemocracyS (DDS) proposes for Spain. It is not an electoral propaganda document nor a list of empty promises. It is an honest, rigorous, and detailed analysis of the country's current situation, accompanied by concrete, feasible, and coherent solutions, based on logic, common sense, empirical evidence, and respect for all citizens.
DDS does not belong to any traditional ideological current. It is neither left nor right, nor center. It is a global political organization that places reality, truth, and coherence above any dogma. Every proposal contained in this document can be debated, improved, and voted on directly by citizens, because in DDS, power belongs to the people, in a real way, not just in words.
The program is structured around broad thematic areas. For each area, the following is offered: (1) a diagnosis of the current situation using real data; (2) a critique of current policies; (3) concrete proposals with implementation mechanisms; (4) international examples of reference; (5) anticipated consequences, both positive and the risks to be managed.
Spain deserves an honest, competent government that serves all its citizens, without privileges for any group. This program is our contribution to that goal.
PART I: DIAGNOSIS OF THE REAL SITUATION
1.1 Spain in Figures: The Reality that Politicians Avoid
To propose realistic solutions, it is essential to begin with an honest diagnosis. Official figures, when correctly interpreted, reveal a structurally fragile situation that traditional parties—both those in government and those in opposition—systematically minimize, distort, or use for electoral purposes instead of addressing it seriously.
|
INDICATOR |
REAL SITUATION (2024) |
|
Public debt |
~118% of GDP (2024), approx. €1.6 trillion |
|
Total unemployment |
~11.5% (2024), the highest in the EU after Greece |
|
Youth unemployment |
~26-28%, a structural, not a cyclical, data point |
|
GDP per capita |
~€30,000 (PPP), below the EU average |
|
Annual public deficit |
~3-4% of GDP, systematic non-compliance |
|
Relative poverty |
~26% of the population (AROPE, Eurostat) |
|
R&D&I spending |
~1.4% of GDP, well below the EU target of 3% |
|
Labor productivity |
It's lower than in Germany, France, or the Netherlands. |
|
Estimated underground economy |
~18-22% of GDP (OECD) |
|
Emigration of young graduates |
Tens of thousands a year, loss of human capital |
These are not opinions: they are facts documented by independent organizations such as Eurostat, the IMF, the OECD, and the Bank of Spain. Any political program that does not start from this reality is dishonest or incompetent. At DDS, we always begin with the truth.
1.2 The Four Structural Crises of Spain
1.2.1 Crisis of the Production Model
The Spanish economy remains based on a low value-added model: mass tourism, construction, hospitality, and retail account for a disproportionate percentage of employment and GDP. This model generates precarious, seasonal, low-paying jobs that are highly vulnerable to external shocks (pandemics, geopolitical crises, climate change). The 2020 pandemic brutally demonstrated this structural fragility.
- Tourism represents ~12-13% of GDP, a figure comparable to developing economies, not to European powers.
- The R&D&I sector is chronically underfunded: only ~1.4% of GDP compared to 3.13% in Germany.
- The manufacturing industry is weak and has lost ground in recent decades.
- Foreign capital dominates strategic sectors: banking, energy, telecommunications.
1.2.2 Demographic and Labor Market Crisis
Spain is aging rapidly. The birth rate is among the lowest in Europe (approximately 1.2 children per woman), the working-age population is shrinking, and the pension system is under increasing pressure. At the same time, the labor market is driving away qualified young people (brain drain) and maintains a rate of temporary and precarious employment that is destroying the life plans of millions.
- 1 in 3 contracts is temporary or involuntary part-time.
- The median salary is significantly lower than in France, Germany, or the Netherlands.
- The average age of leaving the family home is over 30 years.
- Social Security contributions will be insufficient to maintain the pension system without profound reforms.
1.2.3 Territorial and Institutional Crisis
The unresolved Catalan territorial conflict, unfair and irrational regional funding, extreme political fragmentation, and systemic corruption weaken the State's capacity to make strategic decisions. The system of 17 autonomous communities with overlapping powers generates duplication of administrations, inefficiency, and territorial inequality that is unacceptable in the 21st century.
- Funding per capita varies scandalously between autonomous communities: a citizen of Madrid or Valencia receives radically different per capita public resources than one from Cantabria or La Rioja.
- There are 17 health systems, 17 education systems, 17 partial tax systems: it is impossible to guarantee equal rights.
- Corruption has cost the public treasury tens of billions of euros in recent decades.
1.2.4 Crisis of Representation and Trust
Public distrust in institutions has reached historic levels. The Spanish electoral system (the d'Hondt method with provincial constituencies) severely distorts the proportionality of the vote: parties with millions of votes obtain few seats, while parties with few votes but concentrated geographically have disproportionate representation. Citizens feel that their vote makes no difference, and they are right.
- The vote has a different value depending on the province of residence: this violates the principle of equality of suffrage.
- The parties are largely financed by the state, with no real transparency regarding private influence.
- The distance between representatives and those they represent is structural: the deputies do not answer to their constituents but to the leadership of their party.
PART II: CRITIQUE OF THE CURRENT POLITICAL SYSTEM
2.1 The Two-Party System and Its Heirs
For decades, the PP and PSOE alternated in government, maintaining a system of "elite rotation" in which, regardless of who won, the same power networks—large corporations, banking lobbies, construction companies, and friendly media outlets—continued to dictate fundamental policies. The emergence of Ciudadanos, Podemos, Vox, and Sumar has not broken this pattern: the new parties have been absorbed by the same dynamics of blocs, polarization, and dependence on media and financial apparatuses.
Criticism of the main parties:
|
POPULAR PARTY (PP) |
|
A self-proclaimed defender of free enterprise, in practice he bailed out banks and construction companies with public money. Savage cuts in health and education during the 2008-2013 crisis, placing the burden on the most vulnerable. Implicated in cases of structural corruption (Gürtel, Bárcenas, ERE in some autonomous communities governed by allies). Unable to reform the welfare state fairly: proposes tax cuts that primarily benefit high incomes. Its territorial policy ignores demands for recognition of national identities and exacerbates tensions. |
|
SPANISH SOCIALIST WORKERS' PARTY (PSOE) |
|
Management of the catastrophic 2008 crisis: destruction of 3 million jobs in 2 years. Constitutional reform of article 135 (2011) that enshrines austerity and the preference of debt payment over social spending: done at night, without referendum. Progressive social discourse that coexists with adjustment policies and complicity with financial power. Clientelistic use of public administrations and public media. Inability to resolve the Catalan territorial conflict: neither real dialogue nor a constitutional solution. |
|
VOX |
|
Far-right populism that exploits legitimate discontent with irrational proposals. It proposes eliminating regional powers, but does not explain how to manage the enormous territorial diversity. Climate denial in a country that will suffer severely from global warming. Hate speech towards immigrants that criminalizes vulnerable people without providing real solutions. Supply-side economics without analysis of debt or redistributive impact. |
|
ADD / WE CAN |
|
The redistributive proposals are correct in the diagnosis but lack realistic implementation mechanisms. Universal Basic Income proposal without verified sustainable financing or impact analysis on labor incentives. Excessive reliance on class rhetoric without proposals for profound institutional reform. Internal fragmentation (Podemos vs. Sumar) that demonstrates the priority of personal power over political project. Inability to articulate a broad social majority beyond the "progressive" bloc. |
2.2 The Electoral System: An Imperfect Democracy
The d'Hondt method, when applied to provincial constituencies, produces profoundly undemocratic results. In the 2023 general elections, parties with millions of national votes obtained far less representation in Congress than their actual electoral weight warranted, while regionalist parties with concentrated votes gained disproportionate bargaining power. This system fosters ungovernability, dependence on opaque agreements, and a growing sense among citizens that voting is pointless.
Specific example:
In 2023, Vox obtained over 3 million votes and 33 seats. Junts obtained fewer than 400,000 votes and 7 seats. The value of a Junts vote was approximately 10 times greater than that of a Vox vote. This is not democracy: it is a structural distortion of suffrage.
2.3 Corruption as a System, Not as an Exception
Political corruption in Spain is not a marginal phenomenon of "bad apples": it is a functional system of extracting public resources towards private networks, made possible by institutional opacity, the weakness of independent controls and the political capture of the judiciary and supervisory bodies.
- The Court of Auditors has taken years to investigate obvious cases of embezzlement.
- The General Council of the Judiciary has remained blocked by political agreements for years.
- Political parties finance their structures with public and private money with insufficient controls.
- The "revolving door" between the public and private sectors (politicians becoming managers of regulated companies) is a documented systemic problem.
PART III: POLITICAL PROGRAM — DEMOCRATIC AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
3.1 Electoral System Reform
Spanish representative democracy needs profound reform to bring representatives and the represented closer together, guarantee true proportionality of the vote, and return decision-making power to the citizens. DDS proposes the following measures, which can be implemented in a legislative period with genuine political will:
3.1.1 Single National Constituency with Reduced Threshold
Replace the current system of provincial constituencies using the d'Hondt method with a single national constituency with pure proportional representation and a 2% threshold (currently 3% in many provinces is effectively much higher). This would guarantee that every vote carries equal weight regardless of where the voter resides.
- Expected consequence: Congress would accurately reflect the real preferences of the citizens. Small parties with a national but not territorial presence would have representation. The two-party system would be definitively overcome.
- Risk to manage: Increased parliamentary fragmentation. This can be countered with clear rules for government formation and mechanisms for building majorities.
3.1.2 Individual Representation Mandate
Members of parliament must answer to their constituents, not to their party leadership. DDS proposes the introduction of a verifiable representative mandate: voters in each constituency can call for a recall referendum of their representative if they collect enough signatures (a threshold of 15% of those who voted for them). The closed-list, blocked voting system should be replaced by open or semi-open lists.
3.1.3 Binding Direct Democracy
DDS proposes the introduction of binding direct democracy mechanisms, inspired by the Swiss model:
- Citizen initiative referendum: any proposal signed by 1% of the electoral census (approx. 350,000 signatures) must be submitted to a national referendum.
- Popular veto: any law passed by Parliament can be suspended by referendum if 0.5% of the census requests it within 90 days of its publication.
- Constitutional referendum: any constitutional reform must be ratified by a mandatory popular referendum.
- Reference example: Switzerland holds several rounds of referendums each year on issues of varying importance. Swiss citizens have the highest level of institutional trust in Europe. This correlation is not accidental.
3.2 Institutional Reform and Anti-Corruption
3.2.1 Real Independence of the Judiciary
The General Council of the Judiciary should be elected through a system that excludes direct negotiation between political parties. DDS proposes that the 20 members of the CGPJ be elected: 12 by the judges and magistrates themselves through universal suffrage of the judiciary, and 8 by a committee of legal experts selected by lottery from among jurists with more than 15 years of experience, with parliamentary oversight but without direct political voting.
3.2.2 Armored Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office
The Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office must have constitutionally guaranteed budgetary autonomy, with a minimum budget of 0.1% of GDP, and its director must be elected by Congress with a 3/5 majority. The investigation of cases against high-ranking political officials must fall to judges appointed by lottery from among the heads of first instance courts with more than 10 years of experience.
3.2.3 Radical Transparency
All lobbying activity must be publicly recorded in real time. Public contracts must be accessible on an open digital platform. The assets of all elected officials and top-level civil servants must be declared annually, cross-checked by the Tax Agency, and published in full. Party financing must be audited in real time, with the publication of donors exceeding €500.
3.2.4 Removal of the Revolving Door
A five-year incompatibility period (currently two years) will be established between holding a relevant public office and joining companies in the regulated sector or with public contracts. Violations will be sanctioned with the loss of the public pension and a fine equivalent to the benefit obtained, with no possibility of expiration for up to ten years.
3.3 Territorial Reform: Solidarity Federalism
The Spanish autonomous community model is an unfinished system that has produced administrative duplication, territorial inequality, and ongoing political conflicts. Neither Jacobin centralism nor a confederation of sovereign territories is the answer. DDS proposes a genuine and inclusive federal model, inspired by the German, Swiss, and Canadian models, and adapted to Spain's specific circumstances.
3.3.1 Federal Constitution with Explicit Catalogue of Competencies
- Exclusive powers of the federal state: defense, foreign policy, currency (or coordination with the EU), basic criminal legislation, regulation of financial markets, infrastructure of national interest.
- Exclusive powers of the federated states (current Autonomous Communities): education, health, social services, land planning, local employment policies.
- Shared competencies with mandatory coordination mechanisms: R&D&I, energy transition, migration policy.
- Elimination of provincial councils (except for the Basque Country and Navarre due to their historical particularities): estimated savings of 4-6 billion euros annually in bureaucracy.
3.3.2 Federal Solidarity Financing System
The territorial financing system must be based on three principles: equality of resources per capita adjusted for objective needs (aging, geographical dispersion, insularity); transparent and verifiable inter-territorial solidarity; responsible fiscal autonomy with limits on subnational debt.
- Creation of a Federal Tax Equalization Agency, composed of representatives from all territories, the AEAT and independent experts, with binding decision power on equalization transfers.
- Monthly publication of territorial fiscal flows on a public dashboard accessible to all citizens.
3.3.3 Recognition of National Plurality
The Constitution must explicitly recognize the plurinational nature of the Spanish State, without this implying the right to unilateral secession. A genuine Federal Senate is proposed, with balanced territorial representation and real powers (currently, the Spanish Senate is a chamber without real relevance). The right to use co-official languages in all bodies of the federal State will be guaranteed and funded by the federal budget.
PART IV: ECONOMIC PROGRAM — TRANSFORMATION OF THE PRODUCTION MODEL
4.1 Detailed Economic Diagnosis
Spain needs a profound structural transformation of its economy. The model based on tourism, construction, and low value-added services is unsustainable in the long term for four fundamental reasons: it generates endemic job insecurity, it is vulnerable to external shocks, it has a low productivity ceiling, and it does not produce the technological innovation necessary to compete in the 21st century.
|
STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS OF THE SPANISH PRODUCTION MODEL |
|
Duality of the labor market: 'insiders' with permanent jobs and 'outsiders' with structural precarity. Low productivity per hour worked compared to the EU average: we work more hours with less result. Dependence on mortgage credit to generate growth (the housing bubble is recurrent). Brain drain: thousands of engineers, doctors, and researchers emigrate every year. Business fabric dominated by micro-enterprises (less than 10 employees) with difficulties in financing and innovation. Oligopolistic concentration in key sectors: banking (5 banks control ~90% of the market), energy, telecommunications. |
4.2 Strategic Industrialization Plan
DDS proposes a 10-year National Strategic Industrialization Plan, with verifiable objectives and public-private funding, focused on sectors where Spain has or can develop real comparative advantages:
4.2.1 Priority Sectors
- Renewable energy and green technology: Spain has the highest solar irradiance in Western Europe. The goal is to become the EU's leading exporter of renewable energy and a leader in energy storage and green hydrogen technology.
- Biotechnology and life sciences: building on the excellent research base of universities and centers such as the CRG, the CNIC or the CNIO, with funding for the technology transfer phase (the current weak point).
- Artificial Intelligence and the digital economy: creation of public-private technology clusters in Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia and Malaga, with guaranteed access to startups, universities and large companies.
- Value-added agri-food: Spain is the largest agricultural producer in the EU, but it exports raw materials and imports processed products. The goal is to reverse this equation: to produce and export products with higher added value and verified designation of origin.
- Quality tourism vs. mass tourism: planned reduction of low-spending, high-resource-intensity tourism (mainly parts of the Balearic Islands, the Canary Islands, and the Costa del Sol) in favor of cultural, gastronomic, and nature tourism with higher average spending per visitor.
4.2.2 Implementation Mechanisms
Strategic industrialization requires public instruments that the market alone cannot provide:
- Public Bank for Strategic Investment (BPIE): capitalized with €20 billion over 5 years (a mix of NextGenerationEU European funds and its own resources), dedicated exclusively to financing projects in priority sectors with long-term loans and below-market interest rates. Reference model: German KfW.
- Public innovation contracts: the government guarantees the purchase of a minimum quantity of innovative products or services for five years from companies that develop them locally. This eliminates demand risk, the biggest obstacle to investment in innovation.
- Co-investment funds for deeptech startups: the State co-invests (50/50) with private capital in science-based technology companies, recovering the investment in case of success with a reasonable (non-expropriatory) premium.
4.3 Labor Market Reform
The Spanish labor market is dysfunctional: it excessively protects those who already have permanent jobs and massively destroys temporary employment during crises. The 2021 reform has reduced temporary employment but has not resolved the underlying problem: structural duality and low productivity.
4.3.1 Single Contract with Increasing Compensation
DDS proposes replacing the proliferation of contract types (more than 40 modalities) with a single standard employment contract with the following characteristics:
- Trial period of 3-6 months depending on job qualifications.
- Compensation for unfair dismissal increases with seniority: 15 days per year for the first 5 years, 25 days per year from year 6 to 15, and 33 days per year from year 16 onwards. This eliminates the "barrier to entry" effect that currently discourages permanent employment.
- Individual employee savings account: the employer deposits a monthly sum into the employee's account (similar to the Austrian "Abfertigung neu" model). If the employee is dismissed, they receive this sum. If they resign voluntarily, they also receive it. This makes voluntary job mobility financially neutral.
- Reference example: Austria implemented this model in 2003. The result was greater voluntary labor mobility, without an increase in unemployment and with greater satisfaction for both workers and companies.
4.3.2 Reduction of Working Hours
The 37.5-hour workweek already approved is an insufficient step. DDS proposes a planned transition to a 32-hour workweek over six years, with the following conditions:
- Pilot sectors in the first 2 years: public administration, companies with more than 250 employees.
- Gradual extension to medium-sized companies (50-250 workers) in years 3 and 4.
- Extension to SMEs (10-50 workers) in years 5 and 6, with aid for digitization and reorganization of work.
- Maintaining salary: a reduction in working hours cannot entail a proportional reduction in salary. The required increase in productivity must come from greater organizational efficiency and digitalization.
- Reference example: Between 2015 and 2019, Iceland conducted the world's largest shortened workweek experiment. The results showed equal or greater productivity, lower absenteeism, and improved worker well-being. The model was subsequently extended to over 85% of Icelandic workers.
4.3.3 Minimum Wage Linked to Productivity
The Interprofessional Minimum Wage (SMI) must be automatically updated annually, linking it to real inflation (CPI) plus 50% of the increase in national labor productivity. This ensures that workers participate in economic growth. The current SMI (approximately €1,134 in 2024) should reach 60% of the national median wage (the threshold recommended by the ILO), which in the Spanish context would be approximately €1,300-€1,400.
4.4 Competition Policy and Regulation of Oligopolies
In strategic sectors such as banking, energy, and telecommunications, oligopolistic concentration has led to high prices, limited innovation, and regulatory capture. DDS proposes:
- Radical strengthening of the CNMC (National Commission for Markets and Competition): guaranteed budgetary autonomy, increased sanctioning power (fines of up to 15% of the global turnover, not only Spanish, of the offenders), and obligation to publish all its reports and resolutions in real time.
- Structural separation in the energy sector: companies cannot simultaneously be generators, distributors, and retailers. The electricity transmission network must be fully public (REE already is; the gas sector needs the same transparency).
- Public postal bank: the network of post offices can be transformed into a network of basic financial services (free checking accounts, consumer credit at regulated rates, microloans for the self-employed). This breaks the banking oligopoly for basic services.
- Regulated energy price for vulnerable households: the PVPC tariff (voluntary price for small consumers) must be maintained and improved, with a free social segment for the first 100 kWh per month for households in situations of energy poverty.
PART V: FINANCIAL AND FISCAL PROGRAM
5.1 Public Debt: Truth and Strategy
Spain's public debt (approximately €1.6 trillion, or 118% of GDP) is a fact that no responsible program can ignore. Right-wing parties use it to justify social spending cuts; left-wing parties downplay it with arguments about monetization by the ECB. Both positions are partially incorrect. The reality is more complex:
- The debt is manageable in the short term because the ECB has kept interest rates low for years and has anti-fragmentation instruments. But it is not sustainable indefinitely at the current level.
- The cost of servicing the debt (interest paid) already exceeds 30 billion euros annually, a figure comparable to the education budget.
- The solution is neither brutal adjustment nor inflationary monetization: it is economic growth with a real productive base, combined with a tax reform that increases income without killing activity.
5.1.1 8-Year Fiscal Stabilization Plan
DDS proposes a plan to reduce the structural deficit that does not rely on social cuts but on three simultaneous levers:
- Increased tax revenues through combating fraud and the underground economy (conservative estimate: +15 billion per year).
- Increased tax revenue via progressive tax reform (new taxes on large fortunes, financial transactions, carbon emissions): +20-25 billion per year.
- Reduction of unproductive spending: eliminate inter-territorial administrative duplication (+5-8 billion), reduce subsidies to companies without a counterpart of employment or innovation (+3-5 billion).
- The goal is a zero structural deficit in 8 years, without the need for cuts in healthcare, education or pensions.
5.2 Tax Reform: Real Tax Justice
The Spanish tax system is formally progressive but in practice regressive in many areas: employment income (salaries) is taxed more than capital and property income; large fortunes exploit special regimes, SICAVs, holding companies and aggressive tax planning; the underground economy concentrated in specific sectors erodes the tax base.
5.2.1 Personal Income Tax: Actual Rates for High Incomes
|
INCOME GRADE |
PROPOSED MARGINAL RATE |
|
Up to €12,000 |
0% (high minimum exemption) |
|
€12,001 - €21,000 |
15% |
|
€21,001 - €35,000 |
24% |
|
€35,001 - €60,000 |
34% |
|
€60,001 - €120,000 |
42% |
|
€120,001 - €300,000 |
48% |
|
€300,001 - €1,000,000 |
55% |
|
More than €1,000,000 |
60% |
Capital gains (dividends, capital gains, interest) will be taxed at the same rate as earned income, eliminating the current preferential savings rates for very high earners. The flat 26% savings rate for any amount of capital gains is a tax injustice that DDS will eliminate.
5.2.2 Tax on Large Fortunes
The current wealth tax is ineffective and unfair (some autonomous communities offer a 100% tax break). DDS proposes a federal wealth tax.
- Exempt up to €1,000,000 of net worth (including main residence up to €600,000).
- 1% on net worth between 1 and 3 million euros.
- 2% between 3 and 10 million.
- 3% between 10 and 50 million.
- 4% starting from 50 million.
- No possibility of regional tax breaks (exclusive federal competence to prevent tax dumping between autonomous communities).
- Estimated revenue: 8-12 billion euros annually, according to estimates from the Bank of Spain and tax researchers such as Piketty and collaborators for the Spanish case.
5.2.3 Financial Transactions Tax (ITF)
A 0.2% Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) on equity transactions and a 0.1% tax on financial derivatives (in line with the proposal put forward by the European Commission in 2013 and pending approval). This generates €2-3 billion in annual revenue, discourages high-frequency speculation, and does not affect retail investors or the financing of the real economy.
5.2.4 Radical Fight Against Tax Fraud
Spain's shadow economy represents between 18% and 22% of GDP. Eliminating just half of it would generate an additional €30-40 billion in revenue annually. DDS proposes:
- Massive investment in the Spanish Tax Agency (AEAT): doubling the number of inspectors in 5 years. The return on investment for each tax inspector is between €1.5 and €10 million annually in additional revenue: it is the highest-yielding public investment possible.
- Mandatory electronic invoicing for all self-employed individuals and companies, with real-time connection to the AEAT (the VeriFactu system is already in the process of implementation: accelerate it).
- Limitation of cash payments to 500 euros (currently 1,000 euros).
- Automatic criminal penalties for frauds exceeding 600,000 euros with no possibility of tax amnesty (tax amnesties are unconstitutional in many systems and morally unfair to those who comply).
- Automatic exchange of tax information with all tax havens that have interests in Spain, on the condition that non-cooperation implies exclusion from public tenders and sanctions on assets based in Spain.
5.3 Pensions: Real Sustainability, Not Propaganda
The Spanish pension system is a pay-as-you-go system (active workers finance the pensions of retirees). With a rapidly aging population and a very low birth rate, this system is mathematically unsustainable in the long term without reforms. The partial solutions already adopted (extending working life, indexing pensions to inflation) are necessary but insufficient. DDS proposes a comprehensive package:
- Separation of funding sources: contributory pensions should be financed entirely through social security contributions; non-contributory pensions and social supplements through general taxes. Currently, there is confusion that is generating a structural deficit in the Social Security system.
- Swedish individual notional accounts as a complementary (not a substitute) component: each worker has a "virtual account" that records their contributions and accumulates them with a notional interest rate linked to GDP growth. Upon retirement, the pension is calculated based on the accumulated balance. This provides transparency, flexibility, and sustainability.
- Incentives for birth rates (see social section): increasing the birth rate is the only real long-term demographic solution.
- Regulated immigration as a demographic complement: Spain needs skilled and unskilled labor immigration. An orderly, non-patronage-based points-based immigration system could bring in 200,000-400,000 new contributors per year.
- Expected consequence: A diversified pension system (pay-as-you-go + notional accounts + demographic policies) is significantly more resilient to demographic shocks than the current monolithic model. Pensions are guaranteed in real terms for the next 30 years.
PART VI: SOCIAL PROGRAM — REAL EQUALITY, NOT RHETORIC
6.1 Education: The Most Profitable Investment
Education is the most powerful determinant of social mobility, economic productivity, and democratic quality. The Spanish education system is structurally sound in its foundations but suffers from three chronic problems: constant legislative instability (8 education laws in 40 years), territorial inequality in quality and resources, and the gap between what is taught and what the 21st-century economy and society need.
6.1.1 National Education Pact
Spain needs a constitutionally enshrined National Education Pact that guarantees the stability of the education system beyond electoral cycles. This pact must include:
- Public spending on education should be a minimum of 5% of GDP (currently ~4.1%), financed with federal resources to guarantee territorial equality.
- A common core curriculum of 80% across all Autonomous Communities, with 20% territorial adaptation. This will put an end to the situation where a student from one Autonomous Community arrives at university with radically different knowledge than one from another.
- External and independent evaluation of the education system, with publication of results by center and by Autonomous Community, without taboos.
- Real digitization of classrooms: not just tablets, but teacher training in digital pedagogy, guaranteed high-speed connection in all public centers, and quality open-source educational platforms.
6.1.2 Vocational Training: The Model That Works
Germany has 60% of its young population enrolled in dual vocational training; Spain, 15%. German vocational training (Berufsausbildung) combines on-the-job training in real companies with theoretical training in schools, with paid contracts from day one. The result: youth unemployment in Germany is around 5%; in Spain, around 27%. The model works and is well-documented. DDS proposes:
- Transformation of Spanish vocational training to the dual model in 5 years, with the obligation for companies with more than 50 employees to offer dual vocational training places.
- Improved salaries for vocational training technicians: their salaries should be closer to those of university graduates in equivalent specialties.
- Vocational training centers specialized by territorial sector: industrial zone → Vocational training in advanced manufacturing; agricultural zone → agri-food and biotechnology; tourist zone → hospitality, languages, cultural management.
6.1.3 University: Excellence and Equity
- Sufficient university scholarships are needed so that no academically gifted student has to drop out for financial reasons. Currently, the scholarship system is inadequate and creates unfair penalties.
- Independent and periodic evaluation of the teaching and research quality of all university departments, with real consequences for those with chronic poor performance.
- Competitive and well-paid predoctoral contracts are needed to retain research talent. Currently, doctoral students' salaries are incompatible with independent adult life.
- Special visas for researchers and highly qualified professionals (similar to the Startups Visa model but applied to science and university teaching).
6.2 Health: Universal, Public and of Quality
The Spanish healthcare system is one of the best in the world according to the WHO and the Bloomberg Health Index, but it is under increasing pressure due to an aging population, chronic illnesses, chronic underfunding, and waiting lists that are scandalously long in some autonomous communities. Privatizing parts of the system has proven to be more expensive and of lower quality than direct public management in most comparative studies.
6.2.1 Federal Minimum Funding Guarantee
Public spending on healthcare must be guaranteed at the federal level at a minimum of 7% of GDP (currently ~6.2%), with a system of transfers ensuring that no autonomous community has per capita spending below 90% of the national average. Autonomous communities may supplement this with their own resources but may not cut spending below the federal minimum.
6.2.2 Reduction of Waiting Lists
- Hiring of 15,000 additional doctors and 25,000 additional nurses over 4 years, federally funded.
- Maximum waiting time guaranteed by law: emergency diagnosis within 24 hours, specialist consultation within 30 days, scheduled surgery within 90 days. If this timeframe is exceeded, the patient is entitled to treatment at another center (including private) at public expense.
- Universal telemedicine and e-prescription: reduction of unnecessary face-to-face consultations by 30-40%, freeing up capacity for complex cases.
6.2.3 Mental Health: The Greatly Forgotten
Spain has one of the lowest ratios of public psychologists and psychiatrists per capita in the Western EU: 6 psychologists per 100,000 inhabitants (compared to 18 in Germany or 22 in France). The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a silent mental health crisis that the system cannot absorb.
- National Mental Health Plan with an additional investment of 3 billion over 5 years.
- Integration of clinical psychology in Primary Care: one psychologist per health center with more than 15,000 patients.
- Mental health services in schools: one counselor/psychologist for every 400 students (currently the average ratio is 1 for more than 1,000).
6.3 Housing: A Right, Not an Investment
The housing crisis is Spain's most pressing social problem in 2024-2026. Rents in Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, Malaga, and other cities have risen by 40-80% in five years. Wages have not increased proportionally. The result: an entire generation excluded from the housing market and condemned to precarious housing. The causes are multiple: a shortage of building land in high-demand areas, real estate speculation, the proliferation of tourist apartments, and a lack of affordable public rental housing.
6.3.1 Affordable Rent Public Park
The stock of public rental housing in Spain is ridiculously small (~2% of total housing, vs. ~30% in the Netherlands or ~20% in Austria). DDS proposes:
- Construction of 200,000 public rental homes in 8 years, with mixed financing: European funds, direct public investment and issuance of housing bonds guaranteed by the State.
- Mobilization of empty homes held by large landlords (banks, investment funds, SAREB): a progressive tax is established on homes that have been empty for more than 2 years in high-demand areas, with the possibility of temporary expropriation (10 years) in exchange for fair compensation, to integrate them into the public rental stock.
- Regulation of tourist rentals: Tourist apartments in high-demand areas require a limited license per neighborhood. Local councils have the authority but need clear and consistent state legal support.
6.3.2 Regulation of the Rental Market
The Urban Leases Act must guarantee:
- Rental contracts of a minimum of 5 years for primary residence (currently this is what the reformed LAU establishes, it must be maintained and reinforced).
- Price containment index for high-demand areas, with a maximum annual update equal to inflation. Large property owners (more than 10 properties) are required to apply it; small property owners have a more flexible system but with tax benefits if they comply.
- Direct rental assistance for young people aged 18-35 with incomes below €25,000 per year: €250 per month for a maximum of 4 years. Estimated cost: €2-2.5 billion annually.
6.4 Equality and Diversity Policies
DDS believes in true equality for all people, regardless of gender, origin, sexual orientation, religion, or ability. Equality is not just rhetoric: it is a set of measurable policies with verifiable indicators.
6.4.1 Gender Equality
- Gender pay gap: all companies with more than 25 employees are required to prepare and publish an annual salary register broken down by gender and professional category. An automatic fine of 2% of turnover will be imposed for any pay gap exceeding 5% that is not objectively justified.
- Real co-responsibility: paternity and maternity leave of equal duration, non-transferable, paid at 100%, extended to 20 weeks for each parent.
- Gender violence: more resources for shelters (double places in 4 years), effective electronic monitoring system for aggressors (currently there are serious flaws in the implementation), mandatory training in gender perspective for judges and prosecutors.
6.4.2 Disability and Inclusion
- Obligation of universal accessibility in all buildings and public spaces by 2030, with real penalties for non-compliance.
- Protected employment and a quota of 5% in public companies and 3% in private companies with more than 50 workers (currently 2% in companies with more than 50 workers is poorly supervised).
- Support for the social and cooperative economy of inclusion for people with functional diversity.
6.4.3 Immigration Policy: Order and Humanity
Immigration is a structural and irreversible phenomenon that Spain needs to manage intelligently, not with demagoguery. DDS's position is clear: Spain needs immigration for demographic and economic reasons, and has a legal and moral obligation to guarantee dignified treatment to those who arrive on its territory. These two positions are compatible and mutually reinforcing.
- Points-based immigration system: residence and work permits are granted based on qualifications, languages, verified job demand, and family ties. Reference models: Canada and Australia.
- Accelerating asylum procedures: the average resolution time in Spain is 1-3 years, during which the applicant lives in legal limbo. Objective: resolution within 6 months with additional resources for CEAR and UNHCR in Spain.
- Active integration: mandatory and free Spanish courses, accelerated recognition of foreign qualifications, intercultural mediators in public services.
- Rejection of criminalization: undocumented immigrants are not criminals but people in complex administrative situations. Immigration Detention Centers (CIEs) must be radically reformed to guarantee humane conditions and a maximum stay of 30 days.
PART VII: ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND ECOLOGICAL TRANSITION
7.1 Climate Change: A Real Emergency
Spain is one of the European countries most vulnerable to climate change: rising temperatures above the European average, progressive desertification of the southeastern Iberian Peninsula, and increasingly frequent and intense extreme weather events (storms, droughts, forest fires). The devastating storm in Valencia in November 2024 demonstrated that the climate crisis is not a future threat but a present reality that is already claiming lives and destroying local economies.
Ignoring climate change is not a conservative option: it's a suicidal one. Climate denial by parties like Vox is not only scientifically incorrect but also economically irresponsible: the costs of inaction far outweigh those of the ecological transition.
7.2 Energy Transition Plan
7.2.1 Objectives
- 100% electricity from renewable sources by 2040 (currently ~60%, with a rapidly increasing trend).
- Carbon neutrality by 2050 (EU commitments already made).
- Coal phase-out: already completed. Nuclear power phase-out: a complex decision that DDS proposes to review using scientific criteria (see below).
- Green hydrogen: Spain has the solar and wind potential to become Europe's leading producer of green hydrogen for export. Target: 4 GW of electrolysis capacity by 2030 (National Hydrogen Plan already exists; accelerate its implementation and ensure it is properly funded).
7.2.2 The Nuclear Debate: Truth about Atomic Energy
DDS applies the principle of truth even when it is uncomfortable. Nuclear energy is a source with real advantages and disadvantages that deserve honest, non-ideological analysis.
- Real advantages: Low operating cost once the plant is amortized, CO2 emissions close to zero during operation, high energy density, constant supply (does not depend on wind or sun).
- Real drawbacks: Soaring construction costs for new power plants and systematic delays in Europe (Flamanville in France, Olkiluoto in Finland). The problem of waste storage remains unresolved. The risk of accidents is low but not zero, with potentially catastrophic consequences.
DDS proposes: extending the lifespan of existing (already amortized) nuclear power plants until the renewable energy grid can absorb their closure without risk to supply, subject to independent safety inspection. No construction of new fission power plants. Investment in nuclear fusion research (ITER) as a long-term option.
7.2.3 Energy Communities
Local energy communities represent the democratization of energy: groups of citizens, cooperatives, and municipalities that produce, consume, and share renewable energy. In Germany, Austria, and Denmark, they are a cornerstone of the energy system. In Spain, they have been legally recognized since 2021, but bureaucratic hurdles hinder their development.
- Radical simplification of administrative procedures for establishing and operating energy communities: maximum 30 days of processing.
- Right to shared self-consumption in apartment buildings without unjustified technical restrictions.
- Public funding program for energy communities in rural municipalities and areas with high energy poverty.
7.3 Territorial Management and Disaster Prevention
The DANA storm in Valencia (November 2024) has revealed systemic failures in climate risk management: late warnings, lack of coordination between administrations, inadequate infrastructure, and urbanization of high-risk areas. DDS proposes:
- A unified National Early Warning System: a single emergency command chain, with SMS alerts sent to all phones in at-risk areas, eliminating the need for specific apps. The ES-Alert system already exists, but its implementation during the DANA storm was delayed and insufficient.
- Mandatory review and update of all municipal land-use plans to incorporate updated climate risk data from 2020-2024. Prohibition of new construction in areas of high river risk.
- National Climate Prevention and Resilience Fund: 5 billion over 10 years for riverbank restoration, revegetation of burned areas, drainage and containment infrastructure.
- Mandatory incorporation of climate risk into all public infrastructure projects, with updated impact assessment every 10 years.
PART VIII: FOREIGN POLICY, DEFENSE AND POSITION IN THE WORLD
8.1 Europe: Intelligent Integration, Not Submission
Spain is a medium-sized country in the European context and an actor with real influence in the EU, especially in relation to Latin America and the Mediterranean. DDS's position regarding the EU is one of active and constructive integration, not Euroscepticism or uncritical Euro-enthusiasm.
- The monetary sovereignty ceded to the ECB has advantages (stability, protection against speculative attacks) and disadvantages (inability to devalue competitively, monetary policy not always adapted to the Spanish situation). DDS accepts the reality of the euro and proposes maximizing the fiscal instruments available within the European framework.
- Advocating for reform of the Stability and Growth Pact: the 3% deficit and 60% debt limits, established in the 1990s, are inadequate for the 21st-century economy. DDS supports European fiscal rules that exclude investments in green infrastructure, digitalization, and defense from deficit calculations, as proposed by the European Commission in its 2023 reform.
- Boost the Capital Markets Union and minimum tax harmonization (minimum corporate tax rate of 15%: already agreed in the OECD and the EU; apply it effectively).
8.2 Defense: Responsibility without Militarism
DDS is not a naive pacifist organization: it recognizes that security is a public good that requires investment and real defense capabilities. At the same time, it rejects militarism, the arms race, and the subordination of foreign policy to defense-industrial interests.
- Defense spending target of 2% of GDP (NATO commitments): Spain is below this target. DDS supports achieving this target gradually over 6 years, provided that the increase is primarily allocated to cybersecurity, intelligence, strategic mobility, and shared European defense capabilities, not just hardware spending.
- Autonomous European defense: active support for the creation of a European defense capability that reduces excessive dependence on the US. The war in Ukraine has demonstrated that Europe needs genuine strategic autonomy.
- A foreign policy based on international law, multilateralism, and non-interference in the internal affairs of other states. No to wars of choice; yes to collective defense within the framework of the UN and NATO.
8.3 Latin America: An Adult Relationship
Spain's relations with Latin America are shaped by unique historical, cultural, and economic ties, but also by the colonial legacy that generates legitimate resentment. DDS proposes a Latin American policy based on mutual respect, non-interference, and cooperation on an equal footing.
- Formal and historical recognition of the crimes of colonialism, without economic reparations (legally unfeasible 500 years later) but with expanded cultural, educational and scientific cooperation programs.
- Simplified visa policy for Latin American citizens who want to study or work in Spain.
- Active support for Latin American regional integration (CELAC, MERCOSUR) without taking sides in internal disputes.
PART IX: DDS'S DEMOCRATIC PROPOSAL — WHY WE ARE DIFFERENT
9.1 The Founding Principles of DDS
DirectDemocracyS is not a traditional political party. It is a global political organization that proposes a radically different model of power management: based on collective ownership, shared leadership, and genuine direct democracy. These are not slogans: they are concrete institutional mechanisms.
|
DDS OPERATING PRINCIPLES |
|
FACT: No DDS policy proposal can be based on false or manipulated data. The analyses are verifiable and the sources are public. LOGIC: Each proposal has an explicit causal chain: problem identified → cause analyzed → proposed solution → expected consequences. COHERENCE: There are no contradictions between areas of the program. Fiscal policy is consistent with social policy, which is consistent with environmental policy. RESPECT: No one is an enemy for disagreeing. Debate is a tool for improvement, not a war. COLLECTIVE OWNERSHIP: DDS has no individual owners. All members have equal rights and responsibilities. SHARED LEADERSHIP: No one person can concentrate excessive power. Leaders are coordinators, not bosses. DIRECT DEMOCRACY: Citizens vote directly on the most important decisions, not just for representatives. |
9.2 The Micro-Group Model and Fractal Expansion
DDS organizes its structure into micro-groups of 5 people. Each micro-group makes decisions by consensus or qualified majority. When a micro-group has built sufficient cohesion and understanding of the program, it can expand by creating new satellite micro-groups. This fractal structure (1→5→25→125→625 people) ensures that growth does not dilute internal democratic quality: each level has the same rights and the same control mechanisms.
- The decision of each micro-group is sovereign in its sphere but must be consistent with the fundamental principles of DDS.
- Conflicts between micro-groups are resolved through mediation and, if necessary, by voting by all affected members.
- No micro-group can impose decisions on another: coordination is horizontal, not vertical.
9.3 Three-Code Identity Verification
DDS guarantees that each member is a real and unique individual through a three-code identity verification system. This system allows for anonymous participation in deliberations while ensuring that each participant has one and only one identity within the system. There is no possibility of voting twice or creating false identities. Full details of the system are available in the DDS technical documentation at directdemocracy.org.
9.4 Implementation Proposal in Spain
DDS proposes a roadmap for gradual and verifiable implementation in Spain:
|
PHASE |
OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS |
|
Year 1-2 |
Building micro-groups in major Spanish cities. Formation of 500 founding micro-groups (2,500 people). Legal registration as a political party in Spain. |
|
Year 2-3 |
First direct consultation with members on the program's priorities for Spain. Presentation of municipal elections in pilot cities. |
|
Year 3-5 |
Expansion to 5,000 micro-groups (25,000 active members). Participation in regional and general elections. |
|
Year 5+ |
With parliamentary representation, gradual implementation of the program reforms, with periodic public verification of the results. |
PART X: IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP AND ANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES
10.1 Priorities of the First Term (4 Years)
An ambitious program like this cannot be implemented all at once. The sequence matters: some reforms are prerequisites for others, some generate revenue that finances others, and some require prior social consensus. DDS proposes the following prioritization:
Year 1: Urgent Reforms
- Reform of the electoral system (single constituency, open lists): does not require constitutional modification, only reform of the LOREG.
- Anti-Corruption Law: independent anti-corruption agency, radical transparency, elimination of the revolving door.
- Start of tax reform: immediate implementation of the gender salary register, fight against tax fraud, limitation of cash.
- Housing emergency: moratorium on evictions for non-payment of regular rent, acceleration of the public housing stock.
Year 2: Structural Reforms
- Approval of the Strategic Industrialization Plan and capitalization of the Public Investment Bank.
- Labor market reform: single contract with increasing compensation, start of the transition towards 32 hours.
- Vocational training reform: launch of the dual model in 10 pilot regions.
- Presentation to Congress of the Solidarity Federalism model for debate and negotiation.
Years 3-4: Consolidation and Expansion
- Federal constitutional reform: convening a Constitutional Convention with direct citizen participation.
- Implementation of the Wealth Tax at the federal level.
- Expansion of mental health, public housing and dual vocational training policies to the entire territory.
- Public and verifiable evaluation of the program's results, with adjustment of policies that do not work.
10.2 Expected Consequences: Positive and Risks
|
EXPECTED POSITIVE CONSEQUENCES (conservative estimates) |
|
Reduction of total unemployment to 7-8% in 5 years (Dual Vocational Training, industrialization, reduced working hours). Reduction of youth unemployment to 12-15% in 5 years (Dual Vocational Training, elimination of contractual duality). Additional tax revenue of 40-50 billion annually via tax reform and anti-fraud measures. Reduction of the structural deficit to 1% of GDP in 6 years. Increase in R&D spending to 2.5% of GDP in 8 years. Construction of 200,000 public rental homes in 8 years. Reduction of relative poverty from 26% to 18% in 6 years. Spain, leader in renewable energy: 100% renewable electricity by 2040. Increase in institutional trust (measured by Eurobarometer) by 15 points in 4 years. |
|
RISKS TO MANAGE (honestly) |
|
CAPITAL FLIGHT: Tax reform may incentivize the departure of large fortunes. Countermeasure: coordination with the EU, automatic exchange of information, exit tax on transferred assets. RESISTANCE FROM ESTABLISHED INTERESTS: banks, construction companies, and large corporations will resist reforms. Countermeasure: broad social coalition, transparency of lobbying efforts, and direct communication with citizens. PARLIAMENTARY FRAGMENTATION: Electoral reform may lead to further fragmentation. Countermeasure: Clear rules for forming majorities, mechanisms for government stability. TERRITORIAL RESISTANCE: Federal reform may generate conflicts with autonomous communities that lose powers or funding. Countermeasure: transparent negotiation process, territorial referendum. WAGE INFLATION: The increase in the minimum wage and the reduction in working hours can generate inflationary pressure. Countermeasure: gradual implementation, linkage to productivity, continuous monitoring. OVERLOAD OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM: Anti-corruption reforms will generate an increase in cases. Countermeasure: Investment in the judicial career path, digitalization, specialized courts. |
10.3 Evaluation Metrics
DDS is committed to publishing a semi-annual evaluation report for each implemented policy, using predefined indicators and a transparent methodology. Citizens must be able to verify whether promises are being kept. If they are not, the reasons must be explained and the policy adjusted. Accountability is not optional: it is the foundation of democratic legitimacy.
|
INDICATOR |
OBJECTIVE AND SOURCE OF VERIFICATION |
|
Total unemployment |
Target: <8% in 5 years (Source: EPA/INE) |
|
Youth unemployment |
Target: <15% in 5 years (Source: EPA/INE) |
|
Debt/GDP |
Target: <100% in 8 years (Source: Bank of Spain) |
|
Structural deficit |
Target: <1% of GDP in 6 years (Source: AIReF) |
|
R&D&I spending |
Target: >2.5% of GDP in 8 years (Source: INE/Eurostat) |
|
Relative poverty (AROPE) |
Target: <18% in 6 years (Source: Eurostat) |
|
Tax fraud |
Objective: 50% reduction in 6 years (Source: AEAT) |
|
Renewable energy |
Target: >85% by 2030, 100% by 2040 (Source: REE) |
|
Institutional trust |
Target: +15 points in 4 years (Source: Eurobarometer) |
|
Gender pay gap |
Target: <5% in 5 years (Source: INE) |
CONCLUSION: A DIFFERENT SPAIN IS POSSIBLE
The program that DDS presents for Spain is not utopian. Each proposal has precedents in other developed democratic countries: Switzerland's direct democracy, Germany's solidarity-based federalism, Austria's dual vocational training system, Iceland's labor model, the Nordic countries' fiscal transparency, Denmark's energy communities, and the Netherlands' integrated mental health system.
What DDS proposes is not to invent new solutions: it is to have the courage to adopt what already works elsewhere, adapting it to the Spanish reality. And to have the courage to tell the truth: about the real problems, about the costs of the solutions, about the interests that will resist change, about the risks that must be managed.
Traditional parties fail not because they are unaware of the problems—many have excellent experts—but because their incentives are aligned with perpetuating the system that gives them power, not with solving citizens' problems. A party that depends on funding from large banks cannot regulate the banking oligopoly. A party that needs the votes of homeowners cannot control the rental market. A party whose elite benefits from the revolving door cannot eliminate it.
DDS doesn't have these contradictions because its collective ownership structure and shared leadership make it impossible to capture by special interests. No person, no group, no donor can buy DDS because DDS is priceless: it belongs to all its members equally.
Spain deserves a better future. Spanish citizens are hardworking, creative, compassionate, and intelligent. The problem isn't the people: it's the political system that has been imposed upon them and that doesn't represent their true interests. DDS proposes changing it. Not with violence, not with rupture, but with intelligence, coherence, and genuine democracy.
Change is possible. Change is necessary. Change begins when citizens decide they have the right to demand the truth from those who govern them, and that they have the power to build something better.
DirectDemocracyS — directdemocracys.org
Because power belongs to everyone.