Accessibility Tools

Translate

    Welcome to the DirectDemocracyS system. To view all the public areas of our website, simply scroll down a little.

    Breadcrumbs is yous position in the site

    Micro-group profiles

    Users and groups

    Everyone knows that our official members must create an official representative profile, which will have their geographic coordinates as their username and will automatically be assigned a personalized email address with the same username @directdemocracys.org. With this representative profile, they will create their own micro-group, which will officially represent DirectDemocracyS in each geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area, with up to 1,000 inhabitants.

    A question many of our users, and even some visitors, ask us is: if a new user wants to use their real first and last name as their username, can they do so?

    Each new user can use whatever username they want according to our username rules, as explained at this link:

    https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-registration/best-username

    If you wish to waive your right to remain completely invisible, from the outside or even from the inside, you can do so. Although we advise everyone not to disclose their real information, even if it's just a username and, if applicable, your primary country of residence.

    If you wish to waive your right to remain completely anonymous and have a username that contains your real name and surname, you are free to do so, and no one can force you to change your mind, as long as your real name and surname do not contain the two "pp"s (political profile) at the end. This is because this is a superior user type that can only be requested, obtained, and used by official members who have paid their annual membership fee.

    What types of users are eligible to join local geographic microgroups?

    Only our official members, who have paid their annual dues and have user levels above that of official member, can join local microgroups. Those who create and manage a microgroup from the start, as founders, must apply for and obtain an official representative user level, and then create the local microgroup. They can inform the public about the existence of DirectDemocracyS and the microgroup in their urban or rural area, select the most suitable people to become new official members, verify annual dues (at the appropriate time, they can collect annual dues, donations, and other payments in cash, issuing a receipt), verify the identity of new users with verified and guaranteed identities, and officially invite new users by linking them to their political representative profile.

    Shared leadership.

    To implement our truly and fully shared leadership, all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, can vote and decide on various issues in voting groups linked to each micro-group. If they subsequently obtain the official member user type, they will be able to access and join the micro-group, or our official organization (if the micro-group has at least 31 members). Official members will obviously vote in separate voting groups from registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, always connected via human bridges to the local micro-groups. Higher user types will also have separate voting groups, also creating electors for each user type within the micro-group. Each micro-group could potentially have a elector for each user type present, as long as all votes and decisions are made exclusively by registered users with verified and guaranteed identities.

    If every official member is obliged to become an official representative and create his own micro-group, around his home, isn't there a risk of having too many micro-groups, in the same area?

    If an official member is already part of at least one local microgroup, they are not required to apply for and obtain the official representative profile, nor are they required to create their own microgroup. However, they have the option, and it is in their best interest to do so. Obtaining the official representative profile and creating their own microgroup, without "competing" with the microgroups they are already part of, helps our system expand like wildfire and offers numerous advantages and benefits. They automatically receive a certain number of points for creating the official representative profile and the new microgroup. They can become super-administrator of their own microgroup, which allows them to access various types of groups at higher levels, with a wealth of potential. By issuing official invitations in their urban or rural area, and by registering new users and official members, they will receive numerous points, which will be added to those earned as an official member previously and subsequently. In short, it's worth helping the system expand and creating micro-groups adjacent to the first one you join, and it costs practically nothing, except the price of a few flyers or photocopies.

    A piece of advice.

    Always join an initial micro-group, and only create a boundary group (as an official representative) with the one you're already a member of. This is because every official member and official representative has the obligation to act as a human bridge, enabling communication, collaboration, physical and virtual connection, and the completion of many activities among all the micro-groups they're part of. Don't join too many micro-groups, but limit yourself to a minimum of two and a maximum of five.

    Motivation.

    The maximum user type a person can have in a single micro-group is super administrator. In all other micro-groups, they can be any other user type except super administrator, and only one different user type per group, up to the level of simple member.

    Reason 2.

    It's not a good idea to be part of too many micro-groups, so as not to remain mere passive spectators, or worse, not to carry out any activity in some of them, risking penalties for inactivity.

    Reason 3.

    In addition to local microgroups, starting with your highest user level (for example, super administrator), you'll be part of all the larger local groups, such as medium groups, large groups, block-by-block groups, neighborhood-by-neighborhood groups, city, district, province, region, state, nation, continent, and international groups. With all these groups, there's a wide range of activities to do, and for best results, you shouldn't overdo the number of microgroups you join.

    An important question about security and privacy.

    How can the right to invisibility and anonymity be guaranteed in microgroups, where more or less everyone knows each other? The official representative of DirectDemocracyS who creates and manages our microgroup near their usual residence is a partially public figure. To prevent any problems, they must be identified and agree to take photographs with the people they contact on behalf of our system. Obviously, no one knows the identity of the personal profile, an official member of our system, which is linked to the official representative. All people who join the microgroup as official members can choose whether to join the microgroup with their own personal profile (official member), or if they wish to be partially identifiable within the microgroup, or if they wish to create their own, they must request and obtain the official representative profile and join one or more microgroups with a partially identifiable profile. In any case, the choice is up to the official member, with the only rule being that they cannot join a microgroup with two profiles at the same time.

    Our advice in this case is to always have an official representative profile ready (you can also obtain a system profile, which we'll discuss in due course). If you wish to carry out political representation activities, as an alternative to managing and representing our system, you can also request the creation of a political representative profile. However, this will only be activated after blocking all other profiles you own, because those carrying out these activities cannot simultaneously manage our system.

    Knowing each other in microgroups, often through relatives, friends, neighbors, or simply by simply seeing each other "out and about," creates a bond that's not only virtual on our platforms where all the activities will take place and where all the necessary meetings will be held, but also physically, with in-person meetings to share ideas and projects to pursue together, as well as other very important activities.

    What if people don't want to pay but are happy to be represented by one or more members in the micro-group, preferring to carry out activities in person, and not on platforms?

    To function, each micro-group must consist of at least two members who have paid their annual fee. With just two people, a wide range of activities can be carried out, both on our platforms (websites) and in person. However, to play a decisive role in our system and become an official organization, the micro-group must consist of at least 31 members. This minimum number of members allows us to divide the group's work, so that only a few members can do everything. For example, in our political organization, to carry out political representation activities, we must have several political profiles who will campaign within the official organization. The official organization has a dedicated group for political activities, a voting group for each user type, which allows them to create electors and play a leading role in the entire system, and many other benefits and advantages for everyone. Having a micro-group with few members, and not carrying out activities by documenting, managing, and verifying them on our platforms, is a choice made by the micro-group members, but it only brings disadvantages to everyone, for several reasons. First, by not carrying out and fully documenting every activity, those activities will not be recognized, evaluated, and rewarded (with many important points, to be distributed among group members based on their merits and specific activities). Even if the various activities were documented, fewer members of the micro-group, fewer activities, and fewer points, because larger groups receive more points, even for the same number of activities, than micro-groups with fewer members.


    Add comment

    Before submitting the comment, you agree that:

    a. To accept full responsibility for the comment that you submit.
    b. To use this function only for lawful purposes.
    c. Not to post defamatory, abusive, offensive, racist, sexist, threatening, vulgar, obscene, hateful or otherwise inappropriate comments, or to post comments which will constitute a criminal offense or give rise to civil liability.
    d. Not to post or make available any material which is protected by copyright, trade mark or other proprietary right without the express permission of the owner of the copyright, trade mark or any other proprietary right.
    e. To evaluate for yourself the accuracy of any opinion, advice or other content.

    Security code Refresh

    Submit

    Donation PayPal in USD

    Donation PayPal in EURO

    Blog - Categories Module

    Chat Module

    Best political force

    What is the best political force in human history?

    Offcanvas menu