Theory and practice

When we publish an informative article, we often reference messages we receive from people through our contact forms. We want to thank those who contact us, both constructively and with unfounded criticism, because they allow us to explain many things and communicate the sound and necessary reasons for all our decisions.

These are not defensive articles; we don't have to justify our decisions to anyone outside, and we won't do so even when, after winning every election we participate in, we'll be tasked with governing, making laws, and administering the various continents, countries, states, and at the local level. Anyone who wants to be an integral part of our system, becoming the true protagonist, proposing ideas and projects, and deciding everything with their vote, can do so only by joining us, according to our rules.

However, it is very useful to explain the reasons for many of our rules.

Today we will tackle an “uncomfortable” topic, which many people, especially outside of us, use to “try to put us in difficulty”.

After a few years of using all the specious, sometimes stupid, and often silly criticisms like a boomerang to demonstrate the superiority of DirectDemocracyS, you will have become accustomed to our detailed and precise responses, which transform potential disadvantages into demonstrations of clear superiority.

One of the criticisms that many people have always made of us: you have a beautiful theory, but in practice, you do nothing to put anything into practice.

First of all, thank you for admitting that in theory, we are beautiful, but above all we are very tidy, organized, and confident.

To do everything optimally, it is necessary to take all precautions to efficiently prevent any possible problem.

Let us explain better.

When we were just a few dozen people, we needed to have all the necessary skills within us to create a system from scratch that was as close to perfection as possible. We carefully selected, first hundreds, then thousands of brilliant minds, to create our foundations, using fundamental rules and methodologies, and to make our system foolproof and unassailable, both from within and from without.

Through the international, continental, and national phases, we have reached tens of thousands of people, with dozens of reliable individuals in every country in the world. We have said it many times: the fundamental rules can only be changed unanimously, to preserve our coherence, the reasons for which we were born, our goals, and the path to achieving them, in the best way for the good of all humanity.

Now , with the local phases, having all of us proposed, discussed, chosen, tested, voted on, created, and implemented most of our important and medium-important rules, we are beginning a long, hard, and very laborious local presence, after which we can move on to the next phases.

We understand the impatience of those outside of us, who in one way or another love DirectDemocracyS and see it as the only hope for the good of humanity, but we prefer to take "elephant steps", slowly but with a clear impact and clearly visible and well-defined.

Many people would like to see the symbols of our political organization, so they can vote in the various elections, so we can begin to demonstrate to the world the undeniable value of our theories. It will take as long as necessary, and as we always say, continuous, hard work, with the direct and concrete commitment of everyone who joins us.

If those on the outside want concrete facts, imagine how eager our official members and users are to start working as soon as possible to change and improve the world.

If anyone thinks that creating DirectDemocracyS as it is today was as simple as snapping a finger, they are sadly mistaken.

It took a great deal of effort, from many people and internal groups, to create what you see. The visible part isn't even 1% of the result of our internal work.

The timeline included: work to create the system, work to test it, work to implement it, and finally the “practical” part.

If for some, practice means seeing DirectDemocracyS participate in elections, we must contradict you. Internally, we are already thinking about the concrete application of our system after winning the elections.

Use logic.

If we were to participate in elections—in all elections, at any level, anywhere in the world—the simplest thing would be to participate, and a clear victory would be virtually assured. This isn't excessive optimism, but rather predictions based on undeniable facts. First and foremost: who can compete with a political force like ours? We are literally the only ones with the potential to bring back to the polls those who haven't voted in a long time. We are the only reliable and credible ones, with the ability to implement every tiny detail of our electoral and political programs.

We're the only ones who could be loved and hated, at the same time, by any other voter, from any other political party. So, do a simple mathematical calculation: those who don't vote will return to vote; those who don't feel represented by other political parties will have the alternative they seek; those who are disillusioned with their own political parties might decide to try to trust us. What percentage—not of those who go to the polls, but of all eligible voters —do you think would vote for us ? According to our calculations, we'll have a clear majority everywhere, of all potential voters, everywhere.

Now, don't expect these "electoral miracles" in the first round, though.

We are known to very few people, carefully selected in the world, so our first appearances might be "lukewarm", but they would be enough to arouse the curiosity of voters who do not vote, or the disappointed, and from that moment, we would no longer have opponents capable of competing with us.

The interesting thing is that we would have loyal voters, for various reasons: total power sharing, responsibility, efficiency, and complete involvement. We do things no one else can do like us, because every traditional political force, divisive by nature, and those who are anti-establishment, are even more divided than the various systems they pretend to fight.

Therefore, our victories will be a natural consequence of all our theoretical work. In short: we're not wasting our precious time, we're simply making our system foolproof, so it won't be a flash in the pan.

We will not be meteors of world politics, but we will become the protagonists of a unique and inimitable model.

Returning to our activities considered "theoretical", awaiting the "practice".

Do you consider it a theory to have continuous, orderly, organized and safe growth of users?

Do you consider having tens of thousands of people, with just as many groups working on concrete and continuous work, a theory?

Having our own platform, free, independent, self-financing, and not dependent on other systems, sounds like theory to you?

Having modern, constantly updated technologies, 5 web servers with various operating systems, on various continents, nearly 100 subdomains for every possible activity, and an integration of world-leading super Artificial Intelligences, sounds like theory to you?

Having rock-solid, impenetrable foundations for our entire system, with foolproof security measures to protect all our activities, all our users, anyone who collaborates with us externally, or anyone who contacts us—sound like theory to you?

Having all the rules, methodologies, and instructions ready to make all our activities function perfectly, with continuous evolution, thus remaining always modern, without denying our past, seems like theory to you?

The fact that not everyone inside, and no one outside, sees everything we're doing doesn't mean there isn't concrete, long, very hard, complicated, and important work. Therefore, we reject any possible accusation of inconsistency.

Each of our national political organizations, based on the proposals received from our local organizations, will independently decide when it is ready to make our existence public to everyone and participate in real elections, after organizing our internal, online, closed primaries and after the various selections of our political representatives.

We're not stopping anyone from starting, as soon as they feel ready. To get us talked about and known worldwide, just a first participation will be enough, even at a local level, even in a remote town. At that point, all our servers will be down, due to the overwhelming number of visitors and requests to join us.

Don't worry, we'll be working temporarily, then activating other web servers, and will be able to handle vastly increased workloads, and millions, and perhaps billions, of new users. There will be some brief, physiological interruptions, but we're prepared to ensure they are few and short-lived.

Just one of our presences, and perhaps even just one tiny positive result, will light the fuse for the big bang that will mark the official birth of DirectDemocracyS, which is represented by moment 0, when every person on earth will know of the existence of our innovation, an alternative to all other systems.

Perhaps for some impatient people, only then will we begin to get serious, but we can assure you that we are serious, from the first moment five crazy visionaries decided to create a system to change and improve the world, in a concrete way, with the help and concrete support of all good people, for the good of all humanity.