Judges of no one

We occasionally receive messages through our contact forms, in which some people ask us about our "alleged" superiority, or about the reasons for our generalized judgments about all other systems, where, after all, there are also some happy people who live well, without too many worries, and without serious problems. Furthermore, in many cases we are condemned because we express very harsh judgments, often "offensive," towards those who "do not think like us." We will talk about those who ask us, because we want to teach people what good and evil are, which are subjective things.

Our supposed superiority is not at all presumed. We look at the facts, and by analyzing every aspect from every perspective, comprehensively, and without prejudice, we quickly realized that we are more fair, equitable, loyal, and reliable, and that we offer impenetrable security than all other possible systems. Ultimately, to create DirectDemocracyS, we examined all the errors and negative aspects of all other systems, implementing our own system to optimally prevent any possible error. We are different in every way: we have rules, methodologies, instructions, even different names, and solid motivations, which make us different, better, innovative, and therefore an alternative to all other systems. Perhaps what makes us special is having created DirectDemocracyS, with the good of all humanity in mind, not allowing a few leaders, a few lobbies, or small groups of people to wield power (which we redistribute), not allowing them to acquire undeserved wealth (those who are rich or deservedly become so have nothing to fear), and not allowing them to gain fame (we don't envy others' hunger; our time will come). Instead, we divided the entire system equally, making all our official members owners of DirectDemocracyS through a single, individual, personal, non-cumulative, and non-transferable action, which is achieved immediately and automatically by each of our official members. This complete division and collective ownership makes us unassailable and prevents us from becoming dictators, effectively preventing any possible internal struggle. What makes us the best is our truly and completely shared leadership, which allows all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, to participate with their own vote in the most important decisions of our system. These decisions are not simply votes, but collective choices that are binding for all our senior and junior users, for all our political representatives, for all our groups, and for anyone who comes into contact with our system.

We implemented these unique and inimitable features from the very beginning, without any discrimination. Anyone who wants to, has the skills, and is compatible with our system can join us by registering according to our rules, creating a personal profile, and immediately starting working with us, accumulating the necessary points from the very beginning to reach the higher user levels.

This method of continuous growth, a little slow, and apparently complicated, protects our system from any possible sabotage or slowdown, but offers literally anyone the opportunity to be our official member, if they have the merits and qualities.

All our official members, as collective owners of the entire system, are also permitted to request and obtain access to all our five special groups, the geographic groups, and other groups, including specialist groups, where admission is based on declared, demonstrated, and verified expertise. Access to these important expert groups is granted, according to detailed rules, to all our official members, and therefore to all our owners, making it impossible for anyone to control our information. Thus, the creation of a few elites to command, or any attempt to control our system from outside, is impossible.

We want to make it clear right away that it is certainly not our intention to change and improve the world, and therefore alter the living conditions of those who already live well. On the contrary, by doing good to those who lack a dignified and normal life, and by always helping those most in need first, for the longest time, and most of all, we will only increase the well-being of everyone, even those who cannot hear or see what is happening around them.

Let's also clarify the concept of judgment. We analyze the reality of the entire world, which is visible to everyone, documented, and verified. We don't make spurious criticisms just to be right, and we certainly don't do it to gain consensus from many people, or votes in elections, and therefore power, money, and fame. For each justified criticism, we analyze the situation freely, independently, neutrally, comprehensively, and confidently, we identify the flaws, and we propose our solutions—perfectly functional and definitively resolving all the various problems. We do this directly, often proposing radical, pioneering, innovative, and reliable solutions. Of course, implementing each of our solutions will require a lot of time and hard work. It's not just about finding the solution, but above all about changing and improving the mindset of people, of all people—not to make them join us, but to get to know us and understand our potential.

Who guarantees that all our solutions, if implemented by us as we created them, will actually work? The solutions themselves, when analyzed by experts in each topic, work perfectly, and no competent, free, independent, or neutral person can deny this. The results are guaranteed, and time, as always, will prove us right.

DirectDemocracyS knows full well that 1% of the world's population is completely satisfied with their lives in all other systems, and that a good percentage (about 15% in our surveys) is content with the world we live in, even fearing any change for fear of losing everything. These people represent the strength of current systems, which fear competition and better conditions for all. They fear equality combined with meritocracy, perhaps because they know full well that many of them are not very competent, and often much of their wealth, power, and fame is not entirely legal, not entirely earned through merit, and therefore, not always and completely ethically and morally correct. Then there are about 30% of people who pretend not to see the problems, and a bit like "the ostrich that hides its head in the ground," they will perhaps forever remain helpless, indifferent spectators, suffering the events around them.

Our system is aimed at everyone, but first and foremost at the vast majority of the world's population, made up of good, intelligent, and competent people. Therefore, especially in the early stages, we primarily address those who believe the world must change and improve, for the good of all, now and for future generations.

In none of our articles, nor in any of our activities, have we offended anyone, nor mocked anyone, but have always told the truth. By thoroughly analyzing the concrete facts, everyone's statements, and all decisions with all their consequences, we have spoken harshly towards all those who create problems for others. For example, by saying that the world we live in is not an earthly paradise, but is full of injustice, inequity, wars (military and economic) with deaths, injuries, destruction, fear, and people living in conditions barely barely accessible, is not the fault of just a few, but of the laziness and inaction of many, or rather, of all, we are certainly not lying. It is the painful but undeniable truth. By saying that there are people who cannot distinguish good from evil, we are not lying. The world we live in itself demonstrates this, in which there are right choices, or wrong ones, or ones that veer closer to good, or closer to evil. If we say: people should have the same rights, the same duties, the same opportunities, but they are not all equal, we are speaking a true statement, one that no one can deny. If we call someone stupid, someone ignorant, someone ignorant a liar, someone a murderer a murderer, someone criminal a criminal, someone a thief, and any other similar statement, we are spreading the truth, which is not our truth, nor even the one that best suits us. Truth spoken directly, without possible interpretations, has no political colors, is not based on religions or traditions, nor even preferences or convenience. Truth documented by reliable sources, fully verified, is non-negotiable, just as for us, and for anyone who joins us, complete freedom and authentic democracy are non-negotiable. Many may think that by not making compromises, we are not engaging in serious politics, but we do not make compromises, because they are the cause of so many of the world's problems. Within us, we have people of all kinds, from every world population, from every established political force, from every religion, tradition, culture, and language. We don't need external collaboration, because we are already composed of every conceivable ideology.

However, let us practice something no one else will ever be able to successfully implement: unity in diversity. We do so with a simple rule: all common rules and decisions must be applied and respected, forever, by all. By distinguishing in our way of speaking and acting, the "we," referring to the DirectDemocracyS system, and the "I," referring to the right guaranteed to all to think differently, with the obligation, however, to respect and forever implement all common decisions.

We don't need users who, as soon as things don't get their way, "take their games and go play somewhere else." While we give everyone complete freedom to leave at any time, according to detailed rules, we consider this immature behavior. Our advice, our winning mentality, and our rules allow anyone to fight for what they believe in, while also having to demonstrate the validity and collective usefulness of their ideas. They can do this from within us, because of the hundreds of people we've expelled, no one has ever been excluded for their beliefs, but for their activities and the consequences, or potential consequences, of their decisions.

What many consider a closed system is actually the most open and respectful of all. Those who consider DirectDemocracyS an overly detailed and "complicated" system are actually wrong. The global situation is complicated, and simplistic and banal solutions are unnecessary. Human nature is unpredictable, and all our rules, respected by all, are needed to achieve excellent results. "Excessive" security measures are fundamental, indispensable, and non-negotiable, because we must protect our system, those who are part of it, and those who collaborate with us, preserving their safety, freedom, and independence. Most of the world's problems are caused by a lack of security and by people left without the proper protection from manipulation.

Avoid phrases like: "I'd join you if only things were done my way." Let's not engage in constant, pointless negotiations with anyone. In our initial stages, we contacted leading experts who demanded things be done as they saw fit, seeking personal, undeserved advantages. Instead of the top ten in each sector, who were often complicit and subservient to the old systems, we preferred to invite the next 90 or 100—almost 10 times as many—who were certainly more compatible with us, not having compromised themselves with the other systems.

We always say it: we don't pretend to teach anyone anything, but rather, we want to learn from anyone who joins us, who can implement any of their ideas and projects, if deemed useful by the community.

We prefer to have active people with us, who are directly involved, working as a team, consistently over time, and who contribute concretely, even with annual contributions, to the smooth functioning of our enormous system. In these ways, with these methods, we can operate flawlessly, regardless of the total number of our users.

For those who just want to watch, they can do so from the outside, or by becoming an external collaborator, or by becoming one of our free users, with no obligation to be present, and without the obligation to carry out any actual activities with us.

In short, there's no shortage of opportunities to connect or actively collaborate with us, but you must always do so, respecting all our rules, based on logic, common sense, truth, research, and mutual respect for all people. If you're unable to do so, don't waste your precious time with us.