Security

Dear friends, we want to publicly thank all our visitors. The week of June 15-21, 2026, saw record visits to our platforms, and in the first few months of 2026, each person who visits our website views an average of seven pages.

It's been five years since we partially made our DirectDemocracyS system public, and the number of new users is growing slowly, in a controlled, orderly, and organized manner, with all security measures in place. However, we're recently exceeding the limits set by our rules. Therefore, while we're allowing new registrations, we'll be forced to block new activations, primarily because almost everyone would like to obtain higher user levels. The reason is simple: those who obtain a higher user level have a wealth of potential, making these user levels very attractive. In practice, the annual fees, attendance requirements, and volunteer work required are the right price to pay for the benefits and advantages they provide. Nearly 90% of those who join us, by registering and creating a personal profile, choose to become our official members, and therefore become collective owners of our entire system. A significant percentage of nearly 10% of new users request to become an integral part of our truly and fully shared leadership, and to be able to vote officially and bindingly on our system, by becoming our registered users with a verified and guaranteed identity. Obviously, within a short time, almost all of our users with a verified identity request to become official members, because they want to obtain a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual action that makes them collective owners of our entire system. Only less than 3% choose the free membership type, which is and will always be absolutely free, with no attendance requirements and no volunteer work required to operate our enormous system. Generally, those who choose the free membership type do so because they aren't sure whether to trust us, and because they don't want to spend money and have obligations. But even in this case, almost all quickly request, and if they meet all the requirements, obtain, a higher membership type.

Proof of our previous statements? Anyone can see that we're telling the truth simply by looking at the list of our users. Almost all of them have a blue check mark next to their username in our social area, which means they're registered users with verified and guaranteed identities. We want to explain to everyone that every official member of our system, while collectively owning our system, is also automatically a registered user with verified and guaranteed identities, because the identity verification methodology is identical for both types of higher-level users. Shared leadership is divided based on the higher-level user types each person who joins us possesses. Each user type votes in separate areas, in different voting groups, forming electors of various types, which are then tallied and determine the final results. There's obviously only one individual vote per personal profile, but the counting and quorum calculation are done based on the user type.

News for anyone who wants to join us. Since during certain periods, for obvious reasons, which we explain in detail in this informational article, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/system-info/system-security/user-number-verification

We block, even for very long periods (up to a year), all new activations, and in some cases, we also block all new registrations (of any type of user). We recommend that anyone request an invitation to join us, using a very simple contact form, at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/infos-contacts/i-want-to-be-invited

Simply enter your real first and last name, or a username (which will allow you to remain completely anonymous), your personal, non-temporary email address (be careful to write it correctly and always verify it), your temporary phone number (be careful to write it correctly and always verify it), your primary country (of which you are a citizen, if applicable, followed, if different, by the country where you reside for at least 6 months a year), and write "I want an invitation" as the subject, followed by the type of user you would like to obtain. For example, "I want a simple invitation to become a free user," or "I want an official invitation to become a registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity," or "I want an official invitation to become an official member."

In your message, please include your exact and complete address. Include a brief introduction about yourself; don't be too detailed; we're not interested in your life story (you can add it, at the appropriate time, after you join us, on your personal page). Please include your skills and expertise, the reasons why you're joining us, what you like and dislike about DirectDemocracyS, what you'd like us to improve and evolve, why we should welcome you into our system, and what you'd like to do, specifically, if we invite you to join us. We'll put you in touch with an official representative who speaks your language and is from your country, in some cases, looking for people who live near you. Like all our contact forms, you can fill them out in any language, and you'll receive a response by email in the language you used to contact us.

We recommend that you check the “send a copy to yourself” box, so you will have a copy of the message you send us, which will also be proof that you contacted us.

Please type the text you see, placing it in the correct place, to prove to us that you are not a robot.

Finally, send us your message, waiting the necessary time (even a few dozen seconds) for the confirmation that appears on the web page, indicating that your message has been sent successfully. It often happens that people fill out everything correctly, but don't submit the form, and then complain that we haven't responded. Always send your message after checking everything, and wait for confirmation that the form has been sent successfully.

The invitation request message is very useful because each person introduces themselves to our DirectDemocracyS system, and to the invitation request management group after the system has introduced itself, with over 500 public informational articles, and approximately 2,000 posts on our blog in the 80 major languages currently in the world (but soon the blog will be in every language). And consider that the public portion, therefore visible to anyone on our platforms, represents less than 1% of all the work we do in our private, restricted, and secret areas. We want to publicly thank all our official members, all types of users with higher potential, and in general anyone who has had the trust, patience, courage, and determination to join us over all these years. We thank everyone who has worked, is working, and will work in the future on our international, continental, national, local, and various micro-group programs. We recommend everyone to carefully read the public article, visible to all, which you can find at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/utility/blog/rules-for-programs

which explains in detail the rules for creating our programs, and how they will be implemented and realized.

We also invite you to carefully read this informative article, which explains how you can submit your proposals, ideas, and projects to develop together.

https://www.directdemocracys.org/utility/blog/ideas-projects-and-proposals

To understand how much we give you and how we are different and better than all other systems, we invite you to read this informative article:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/all-our-rules/all-group-rules/rules-for-specialist-groups/we-give-you-so-much

This informative article explains how we decide things in our system, and how we vote:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/groups-info/program-decision-activities

This article is very important and useful for understanding our system:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/important-initial-explanations

Some mandatory explanations for anyone who wants to study our system:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-administration/mandatory-explanations

How does DirectDemocracyS always stay on the right side? You'll find out by reading this informative article:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-equality-and-meritocracy/being-on-the-right-side

And to read all the other informative articles, we invite you to visit the homepage of our official website. Scrolling down, you'll find a long list of informative articles, all publicly visible, without having to join us. The list is very long, and the information is constantly growing, and you can also find it in the various main menu items on our website pages. We often respond publicly to many questions you send us privately, and we're happy to demonstrate, with facts and in great detail, the rationale behind many of our rules, methodologies, instructions, and security measures.

To conclude this periodic message, which we will also publish outside our system, we have a few requests for anyone who becomes aware of our system.

The first is to avoid over-publicizing ourselves. We're not yet ready to go viral, and we wouldn't be able to accommodate too many people at once in an adequate, orderly, organized, and completely safe manner. The best solution is to be selective, so you can only talk about us with people you consider competent, compatible, and potentially useful to our system. We know that in a world where appearance is considered more important than one's true self, the temptation to propose a system with our unique and inimitable characteristics to others is truly great. But know that for us, in our delicate initial phases, it's essential to have only the right people with us, to lay the solid foundations of our system.

The second request for everyone is not to be superficial, but to study our system thoroughly, with an open mind, before making hasty judgments and before deciding whether to join us. Reflect carefully on the great responsibility we all have together, to concretely change and improve the world.

The third requirement is not to be lazy. Other systems don't ask you for concrete, ongoing commitment, or even to take responsibility for your decisions. They decide everything for you, manipulate you, exploit you, chew you up and spit you out, and never thank you for your sacrifices. DirectDemocracyS, as it is designed, asks you to engage directly, and takes away the "excuse" for justifying your failures and your mediocre life by blaming lobbies and the old, failed traditional politics. With DirectDemocracyS, if things go well—and we're sure we can never do worse than everyone else—the credit will go to everyone, and therefore to everyone who has contributed to our activities. If, however, some small things go wrong, thanks to our system architecture, it will be very simple and quick to find the culprits, not to punish them, nor even to mock them, but to help them know how to prevent other unpleasant situations.

Don't ask us when we'll participate in real elections with our political representatives; we can't predict certain details. Furthermore, with the national, local, and micro-group phases, there will be different timings in various urban and rural areas, with significant differences from one country to another. So our fourth request is for you to be patient and trust our collective work. Trust is important, and we trust everyone, all the time, potentially infinitely, but only until we discover they're lying to us or trying to deceive us. From then on, we'll hardly trust again, and certainly not infinitely.

So our advice: be honest and trustworthy from the first minute, even with your initial presentation. Be yourself, tell us the truth, don't use artificial intelligence to make yourself look better, because over time we will uncover every lie you tell, and we will be disappointed by your behavior. At DirectDemocracyS, even small imperfections, as long as they are disclosed, are accepted, because, being a collective effort, every flaw is corrected by the collective. And perhaps this is what differentiates us and makes us better than all other systems: the fact that there is always a collective effort, where we help each other, because our rules, in addition to logic and common sense, require us to implement respect and concrete help, as long as it is always mutual.

Continue Reading →

Dear friends, we want to publicly thank all our visitors. The week of June 15-21, 2026, saw record visits to our platforms, and in the first few months of 2026, each person who visits our website views an average of seven pages.

It's been five years since we partially made our DirectDemocracyS system public, and the number of new users is growing slowly, in a controlled, orderly, and organized manner, with all security measures in place. However, we're recently exceeding the limits set by our rules. Therefore, while we're allowing new registrations, we'll be forced to block new activations, primarily because almost everyone would like to obtain higher user levels. The reason is simple: those who obtain a higher user level have a wealth of potential, making these user levels very attractive. In practice, the annual fees, attendance requirements, and volunteer work required are the right price to pay for the benefits and advantages they provide. Nearly 90% of those who join us, by registering and creating a personal profile, choose to become our official members, and therefore become collective owners of our entire system. A significant percentage of nearly 10% of new users request to become an integral part of our truly and fully shared leadership, and to be able to vote officially and bindingly on our system, by becoming our registered users with a verified and guaranteed identity. Obviously, within a short time, almost all of our users with a verified identity request to become official members, because they want to obtain a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual action that makes them collective owners of our entire system. Only less than 3% choose the free membership type, which is and will always be absolutely free, with no attendance requirements and no volunteer work required to operate our enormous system. Generally, those who choose the free membership type do so because they aren't sure whether to trust us, and because they don't want to spend money and have obligations. But even in this case, almost all quickly request, and if they meet all the requirements, obtain, a higher membership type.

Proof of our previous statements? Anyone can see that we're telling the truth simply by looking at the list of our users. Almost all of them have a blue check mark next to their username in our social area, which means they're registered users with verified and guaranteed identities. We want to explain to everyone that every official member of our system, while collectively owning our system, is also automatically a registered user with verified and guaranteed identities, because the identity verification methodology is identical for both types of higher-level users. Shared leadership is divided based on the higher-level user types each person who joins us possesses. Each user type votes in separate areas, in different voting groups, forming electors of various types, which are then tallied and determine the final results. There's obviously only one individual vote per personal profile, but the counting and quorum calculation are done based on the user type.

News for anyone who wants to join us. Since during certain periods, for obvious reasons, which we explain in detail in this informational article, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/system-info/system-security/user-number-verification

We block, even for very long periods (up to a year), all new activations, and in some cases, we also block all new registrations (of any type of user). We recommend that anyone request an invitation to join us, using a very simple contact form, at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/infos-contacts/i-want-to-be-invited

Simply enter your real first and last name, or a username (which will allow you to remain completely anonymous), your personal, non-temporary email address (be careful to write it correctly and always verify it), your temporary phone number (be careful to write it correctly and always verify it), your primary country (of which you are a citizen, if applicable, followed, if different, by the country where you reside for at least 6 months a year), and write "I want an invitation" as the subject, followed by the type of user you would like to obtain. For example, "I want a simple invitation to become a free user," or "I want an official invitation to become a registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity," or "I want an official invitation to become an official member."

In your message, please include your exact and complete address. Include a brief introduction about yourself; don't be too detailed; we're not interested in your life story (you can add it, at the appropriate time, after you join us, on your personal page). Please include your skills and expertise, the reasons why you're joining us, what you like and dislike about DirectDemocracyS, what you'd like us to improve and evolve, why we should welcome you into our system, and what you'd like to do, specifically, if we invite you to join us. We'll put you in touch with an official representative who speaks your language and is from your country, in some cases, looking for people who live near you. Like all our contact forms, you can fill them out in any language, and you'll receive a response by email in the language you used to contact us.

We recommend that you check the “send a copy to yourself” box, so you will have a copy of the message you send us, which will also be proof that you contacted us.

Please type the text you see, placing it in the correct place, to prove to us that you are not a robot.

Finally, send us your message, waiting the necessary time (even a few dozen seconds) for the confirmation that appears on the web page, indicating that your message has been sent successfully. It often happens that people fill out everything correctly, but don't submit the form, and then complain that we haven't responded. Always send your message after checking everything, and wait for confirmation that the form has been sent successfully.

The invitation request message is very useful because each person introduces themselves to our DirectDemocracyS system, and to the invitation request management group after the system has introduced itself, with over 500 public informational articles, and approximately 2,000 posts on our blog in the 80 major languages currently in the world (but soon the blog will be in every language). And consider that the public portion, therefore visible to anyone on our platforms, represents less than 1% of all the work we do in our private, restricted, and secret areas. We want to publicly thank all our official members, all types of users with higher potential, and in general anyone who has had the trust, patience, courage, and determination to join us over all these years. We thank everyone who has worked, is working, and will work in the future on our international, continental, national, local, and various micro-group programs. We recommend everyone to carefully read the public article, visible to all, which you can find at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/utility/blog/rules-for-programs

which explains in detail the rules for creating our programs, and how they will be implemented and realized.

We also invite you to carefully read this informative article, which explains how you can submit your proposals, ideas, and projects to develop together.

https://www.directdemocracys.org/utility/blog/ideas-projects-and-proposals

To understand how much we give you and how we are different and better than all other systems, we invite you to read this informative article:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/all-our-rules/all-group-rules/rules-for-specialist-groups/we-give-you-so-much

This informative article explains how we decide things in our system, and how we vote:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/groups-info/program-decision-activities

This article is very important and useful for understanding our system:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/important-initial-explanations

Some mandatory explanations for anyone who wants to study our system:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-administration/mandatory-explanations

How does DirectDemocracyS always stay on the right side? You'll find out by reading this informative article:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-equality-and-meritocracy/being-on-the-right-side

And to read all the other informative articles, we invite you to visit the homepage of our official website. Scrolling down, you'll find a long list of informative articles, all publicly visible, without having to join us. The list is very long, and the information is constantly growing, and you can also find it in the various main menu items on our website pages. We often respond publicly to many questions you send us privately, and we're happy to demonstrate, with facts and in great detail, the rationale behind many of our rules, methodologies, instructions, and security measures.

To conclude this periodic message, which we will also publish outside our system, we have a few requests for anyone who becomes aware of our system.

The first is to avoid over-publicizing ourselves. We're not yet ready to go viral, and we wouldn't be able to accommodate too many people at once in an adequate, orderly, organized, and completely safe manner. The best solution is to be selective, so you can only talk about us with people you consider competent, compatible, and potentially useful to our system. We know that in a world where appearance is considered more important than one's true self, the temptation to propose a system with our unique and inimitable characteristics to others is truly great. But know that for us, in our delicate initial phases, it's essential to have only the right people with us, to lay the solid foundations of our system.

The second request for everyone is not to be superficial, but to study our system thoroughly, with an open mind, before making hasty judgments and before deciding whether to join us. Reflect carefully on the great responsibility we all have together, to concretely change and improve the world.

The third requirement is not to be lazy. Other systems don't ask you for concrete, ongoing commitment, or even to take responsibility for your decisions. They decide everything for you, manipulate you, exploit you, chew you up and spit you out, and never thank you for your sacrifices. DirectDemocracyS, as it is designed, asks you to engage directly, and takes away the "excuse" for justifying your failures and your mediocre life by blaming lobbies and the old, failed traditional politics. With DirectDemocracyS, if things go well—and we're sure we can never do worse than everyone else—the credit will go to everyone, and therefore to everyone who has contributed to our activities. If, however, some small things go wrong, thanks to our system architecture, it will be very simple and quick to find the culprits, not to punish them, nor even to mock them, but to help them know how to prevent other unpleasant situations.

Don't ask us when we'll participate in real elections with our political representatives; we can't predict certain details. Furthermore, with the national, local, and micro-group phases, there will be different timings in various urban and rural areas, with significant differences from one country to another. So our fourth request is for you to be patient and trust our collective work. Trust is important, and we trust everyone, all the time, potentially infinitely, but only until we discover they're lying to us or trying to deceive us. From then on, we'll hardly trust again, and certainly not infinitely.

So our advice: be honest and trustworthy from the first minute, even with your initial presentation. Be yourself, tell us the truth, don't use artificial intelligence to make yourself look better, because over time we will uncover every lie you tell, and we will be disappointed by your behavior. At DirectDemocracyS, even small imperfections, as long as they are disclosed, are accepted, because, being a collective effort, every flaw is corrected by the collective. And perhaps this is what differentiates us and makes us better than all other systems: the fact that there is always a collective effort, where we help each other, because our rules, in addition to logic and common sense, require us to implement respect and concrete help, as long as it is always mutual.

Continue Reading →

Our system has various hierarchies, decided upon by everyone, based on logic, common sense, and mutual respect for all individuals, groups, and populations. The hierarchies at the geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral levels are as follows: international (for our entire system, everywhere in the world), continental (based on residence and citizenship, in one country on each continent), national (based on residence and citizenship in each country), local from the largest to the smallest subdivision, and finally our micro-groups, for urban or rural areas, up to a maximum of 1,000 inhabitants.

The key words of these hierarchies are: communication, collaboration, authorization, management, and mutual control. Each of our organizations or groups collaborates with all those above them (in terms of size and population), as well as those below them (again in terms of size and population), ensuring and implementing appropriate local autonomy everywhere. Unity in diversity is practiced by allowing only single (and therefore unique) official organizations within our system at every level, with the exception of microgroups, where multiple microgroups are permitted within the same area, with the obligation to communicate and collaborate according to very detailed implementation rules. Human and technological bridges are and will be active at every level to enable communication, collaboration, authorization, management, and mutual control.

Each of our official members is a collective owner, at every level, in every hierarchy, from the largest to the smallest, and each of our users with verified and guaranteed identity decides and votes, with the same rules, at the micro-group level, at the local level, from the smallest to the largest, and based on various authorizations, at the national, continental, and international levels.

These hierarchies allow us to always be orderly, organized, and with exceptional safety measures. Collaboration is fair and equitable, rewarding meritocracy, guaranteed through collective points, at the group and organizational levels, and through individual points. It is essential for us to always have a clear and detailed "ranking" based on merit, concrete results, and impeccable behavior.

There are no top-down impositions, but rather rules decided by everyone, which everyone at every level must consistently respect. No one can complain about these rules at any level, nor about those decided locally or in micro-groups, for the simple reason that each of our official members proposes, discusses, manages, and controls, based on their residence and citizenship, from the entire world to their own neighborhood, at the micro-group level. The same method is used for decisions and voting by our shared leadership, composed of all our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities. The other types of "lower" users, while collaborating on many activities in various ways, do not have the power to decide and vote at the system level, but only in the areas reserved for these types of users.

For clarity, let's reiterate: anyone can join us at any time by registering and creating a personal profile. Anyone who meets all the requirements will be activated and can then begin accumulating points through concrete activities and impeccable behavior , while adhering to all our rules. Any new user with the required points and an adequate amount of activity with us will be able to obtain binding voting rights for our entire system by paying the annual fee and verifying their identity, according to our implementing rules. Again, based on very detailed rules, any registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity, having accumulated the required points, and having been present in our system for an adequate amount of time, can apply to become our official member, and therefore collectively own our entire system. If they meet all the requirements, they will be immediately authorized and named an official member.

Therefore, anyone can potentially enjoy all the benefits and advantages of our higher-level user types, without any limitations, and above all, with the same rules and methodologies for everyone. There is no discrimination, only respect for the rules and individual and group merit.

All the information in our system, every word of every single sentence, defines DirectDemocracyS internationally; every word of every sentence, including continental information, defines our system for each continent. At the national level, our users, our groups, our organizations, and our technologies, directly in each country, with the collaboration of their citizens living abroad, have created and continue to improve, integrate, and evolve the various national programs. The sections published and visible to our visitors have already been voted on and are therefore binding for our entire system. However, these are not final programs; they are not complete, and above all, those who proposed, discussed, tested, selected, and voted on them, and therefore created them, can improve, integrate, and even modify them, based on the various decisions. To those who accuse us of changing our minds, or of not being serious about stable programs, we remind you that unforeseen circumstances can arise, and that changing our minds and improving them is not a negative thing; on the contrary, it is the best solution for the common good. We could give hundreds of examples, and at the right time we will publish several informative articles entirely dedicated to this fundamental rule of ours: adapting programs to the needs of the population, without any discrimination.

The instructions for viewing our national programs, and at the right time locally, including the programs of our micro-groups, are very simple. But before providing further details, we invite you to carefully read this informative article in its entirety, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/groups-info/program-decision-activities

To find all our national programs (those published and visible to everyone), just go to this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/pages/categories/8-national-pages/all/name

For those who are already our users, of any type of user, you can use the link to our free website at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/social/pages/categories/8-national-pages/all/name

You'll find, in alphabetical order, all the various countries and territories of the world, with their respective public pages, also visible to our visitors (without having to register or log in; just go to the link and choose your country). After choosing your country, in the listings, you'll find links to the national programs in the various official languages of the various countries, as well as a link to the same programs in English. These programs can then be translated into all the world's languages using our automatic translation module at the top of our websites. Click "-English-" and then click your preferred language in the drop-down menu. You'll automatically see each section in English, automatically translated into your preferred language. If you speak the official language of the country you're interested in, you can read the official version, which is the valid one if it differs from the English version.

The official public pages of our national organizations are written with the names of the various countries in English, so they can be translated and found in all the world's languages. However, each of our national organizations can create numerous national and local pages in various categories and in many sections, as well as public, private, and secret areas of our websites and platforms. Our visitors cannot comment or interact with many of our features, so while they may view some portions of our presentation pages, they cannot interact with us directly from these pages. Our users of all types are required to comply with the various rules, methodologies, and instructions of each group, each page, and each of our activities. To ensure you don't make any mistakes before engaging in activities, especially in public areas, we recommend seeking support from our contact groups using the contact form at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/instructions-contacts/i-can

You must seek support, instructions, and permission before engaging in activities in public areas to avoid having your profile blocked. It's best to avoid any potential penalties.

For those who would like to find the program for their country, you can search our official English-language page at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/pages/435-public-page/45-discussions

For our users, you can use our free website, at this link:

https:// free .directdemocracys.org/social/pages/435-public-page/45-discussions

With this method, you will find the various programs, scattered throughout, based on the dates on which the programs were published, so I recommend using the previous methodology, which is more direct, quick, and simple.

Our programs are published on our blog in various languages , and we have translations into English, as well as the official language(s) of the various countries.

The specifics of our programs are very detailed, and they weren't published to gain consensus, but they are what we will actually do, without any kind of manipulation. We don't need to "appear" different or better, because we truly are, and therefore we don't need to promise unattainable things, or offer gifts, bonuses, and incomes to buy your votes with public money, as many traditional political forces do, who don't hesitate to put current and future generations into debt just to win elections. The best way to subjugate various populations is to put them into debt, and that's why we call them all failures. Obviously, with varying degrees of failure, we don't like to generalize, but more or less everyone is the same. We will change and improve the world for the good of all, without giving anything away to those who do nothing to deserve something, but we will help anyone who works for the common good, and therefore our results are destined to achieve better results than anyone else.

What if someone wanted to comment on our national programs?

Technically, anyone can comment on any post on our blog, and on any of our public articles, on any of our websites, but we prefer not to waste time, and the precious time of our members, moderating all the various comments. Therefore, if anyone wants to contact us to comment (although they can do so directly at any link), we recommend using a direct contact form on our website, which is entirely dedicated to contact forms.

To contact our continental, national, and in some cases even local organizations (soon you will be able to contact all our micro-groups as well), just go to this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/groups-contacts/world-contacts

You must choose the category of your continent, or your country, and then click on the local subcategory (there are and there will be new local categories, and soon also the various micro-groups), or click on the contact form with the name of your country.

In the contact form, please enter your first and last name (we recommend using your real name, or a nickname if you wish to remain anonymous), your email address (make sure you spell it correctly so we can respond), your phone number if you wish (if we can't reach you by email, we can text you), your primary country (where you reside if you are a citizen), and the subject line: opinion on the national program, or proposal for the national program, or, if applicable, continental, or local.

In the message field, write the link to the blog post containing the program or the content you would like to comment on, including any comments on our informational articles.

We recommend that you check the box to receive a copy of the contact form to your email address, as this will be proof , for both us and you, that you have contacted us.

Enter the code you see in the required field, then click Send Email to send us the contact form.

If you contact one of our national or local organizations, please use only one of the official languages of the country you are contacting. This will ensure a quick response, and our email management teams will not be obligated to translate your message. You will receive a response in the language you used to contact us.

For non-geographical contact forms on our contact website, you can use any language in the world, and you will receive responses in the language you used.

If you've already joined us by registering and creating a personal profile, after activating your profile, we recommend logging in to our dedicated contact form website. Enter your login credentials (username and password)—the ones you use to access our free website, which you set up yourself—into the registration form. You'll receive our responses much faster, and certainly more detailed, than those who haven't joined us.

In any case, we respond to anyone who respects our rules.

Our programs are published, integrated, improved, innovated, and updated continuously, first in our reserved areas, then in our private areas, and then, at the appropriate time, they will be published in our public areas, in the ways, times, and with the content decided by each national organization, in collaboration with continental and international organizations.

Happy reading and thank you for your cooperation, which is very important and appreciated by us.

https://free.directdemocracys.org/social/pages/categories/8-national-pages/all/name

Continue Reading →

To maintain this system, which is solid, fair, and welcoming to all, we have adopted clear methodologies that guide our decisions. Our rules don't limit ideas; they make them achievable. Without a shared framework, good intentions remain utopian; with it, they become laws and concrete actions for the common good.

We want to thank those who make our system possible. In this communication, we will explain not only our journey, but also the hows and whys of our decisions. Our door is open to anyone who wants to contribute, because we believe that sharing rules is the only real way to guarantee everyone's rights and opportunities. We want to publicly thank all our official members, who collectively own our entire system, including those in various countries around the world based on residency and citizenship, for their excellent work in proposing, discussing, selecting, testing, publishing, and implementing our national programs. We also want to thank our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities, who together make up our truly and fully shared leadership, in various countries around the world based on residency and citizenship. Together with our official members and higher-level users, they voted collectively, each for their own country, on our national programs. In the next phases, we will do exactly the same work for our local programs, from the largest geographical, territorial, administrative, and electoral subdivisions to the smallest, right down to our micro-groups.

These programs are the result of a great collective effort, both human and technological, perfectly integrated (with impeccable ethical and moral rules), which allows us to do good for all the various populations, everywhere in the world.

We've already said a lot about these programs, and clearly, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/groups-info/program-decision-activities

but there are some aspects to explain.

These are not final programs but are subject to modifications and numerous additions, since DirectDemocracyS is a system with a political organization that fully and immediately implements the only authentic direct democracy. In fact, if our official members in various countries wish to make changes, additions, or additions at any time, of any kind, in collaboration with and with the authorization (which they will easily obtain if all the requirements are met) of our continental organizations, they can do so. All our official members create the programs, propose additions and modifications, which will be voted on by the citizens and residents of each country, and all our identified users, in turn, will vote to approve the various versions, based on highly detailed, fair, just, secure, verifiable, and incorruptible voting rules.

Our programs are not propaganda; they aren't used to gain votes, nor to convince anyone to join us. With the premise that all our activities, including our programs, can evolve and improve, every single word of what we've decided together, with fair and equitable local autonomy, will be implemented exactly as we presented it. We don't give gifts, bonuses, or incomes for nothing. We don't buy the votes of incompetent people with unrealistic promises. Every single charitable activity undertaken by anyone must be deserved and therefore reciprocated, with work for the community and the common good.

Our programs are not utopian; they are all perfectly functional and can be implemented anywhere in the world, through our system, if we have the necessary votes to do so. Indeed, if we win the elections, we will govern and make laws in the common interest, without any kind of discrimination. If we lose, we will continue to advance our programs, as an alternative to other political forces.

We want to answer some short questions, with equally short answers.

Why haven't some countries published their programs? DirectDemocracyS has very detailed hierarchies, with international, continental, national, and local programs, from the largest to the smallest geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral subdivisions, down to our micro-groups, for urban and rural areas, with up to 1,000 inhabitants. Each subdivision, and each of our organizations, will carry out numerous activities, including in many groups, our programs will be created, at every level, for every need. The programs are made public, in final, partial, or provisional versions, based on the decisions of the respective organizations and groups. Every country in the world has already created most of its own programs and will make them public in the manner, time, and in the areas decided by their respective members, after being voted on by their respective program voting groups. Our recommendation, which is not mandatory, is to publish as detailed a version as possible, on our blog, on our various subdomains, and exclusively on our websites and platforms.

Why does the English version state that the program is written in a different language? Each of our national organizations (and local ones will have very similar implementing rules) in every country around the world creates national programs on our platforms in their own national language (in many cases, in multiple national languages, when there are multiple national languages). When our programs are made public to all, in addition to the versions in each country's official languages, an English version is published so that it can be understood and automatically translated by everyone. The English version clearly specifies that the official version, binding for our entire system, is always the one in the official language(s), as the case may be. Simply put, to avoid any possible errors, the official language, or languages, are "more important" than the English version.

Why are the programs so similar? Did you create one and then adapt it to the various countries? As a reference for national programs, there are continental and international programs, but there's no obligation to have similar programs, although we encourage everyone to try to "steal" good ideas from our many activities and working groups. If a country implements a good idea, anyone within our organization can copy, integrate, adapt, and use it, always requesting and obtaining authorization, perhaps even publicly acknowledging the good work of the respective groups. Generally, our programs are very different, but they also have some similar ideas and projects.

Why do the programs contain so many references to DirectDemocracyS technology projects, especially Artificial Intelligence projects such as allddsAI and ddsAI? Did you write them with the help of Artificial Intelligences? Wasn't DirectDemocracyS a 100% human project? Each of our programs can contain references to many of our system's activities and projects, including technology projects and projects related to Artificial Intelligence. The programs, like most of our publications and activities, are written by human groups and published by human groups, after human proposals, discussions, selections, testing, and voting. Obviously, as we have always stated, technological projects and Artificial Intelligences will be implemented and integrated into our system, with security measures, rules, methodologies, instructions, and impeccable ethical and moral rationales. We would be foolish not to take advantage of the various technologies. DirectDemocracyS was a 100% human project in its initial stages, including its fundamental rules, and will continue to be controlled and managed primarily by humans, gradually integrating all necessary technologies. Our official Artificial Intelligence model is collectively owned by all our official members (so, potentially, ddsAI belongs to anyone who joins us and meets all the requirements). It's called ddsAI, and it's the official interface of DirectDemocracyS for all our users and all our groups. Our model has a technology and paradigm that allows for control of our dedicated technological groups, with human bridges, which make our model very useful, and allow it to integrate into allddsAI, literally all existing Artificial Intelligences, in a true democracy of Artificial Intelligences, modeled after our human system, and with continuous and complete control over the various algorithms (based on very detailed implementation rules) of our human groups, of which all our official members can be part, therefore potentially anyone.

You said you can always change your programs. Won't that make you look like other political forces, which almost always fail to fully and correctly implement the programs they received votes for in elections, as promised? DirectDemocracyS cannot be compared to other systems, and there is no similarity between our political organization and the old, failed, unjust, inequitable, unsafe, unreliable, disloyal, and often corrupt traditional political parties. They promise to gain votes, and only partially implement their promises and programs, not always in the common interest. We don't make promises; we present detailed programs, based on reality and truth. Obviously, unforeseen events can occur, or our official members, in the various groups of our organizations, find better ideas, always for the common good, and create projects and programs to integrate with existing ones. If better solutions were found, it would be foolish not to integrate them. Furthermore, there may be unforeseen circumstances beyond our control that could force us to change certain things. Therefore, change is not mandatory, but if necessary , we will do so, obviously based on the proposals and decisions of our official members, with the votes of our shared leadership, in the various countries and at the local level. Programs that are too rigid, inflexible to adapt to various, often unforeseen, situations would be a serious mistake. If a change is decided by our voters/users with verified and guaranteed identities on our platforms, we are obligated to always respect the will of those who join us, and of those who, by voting for us and our political representatives, confer upon us the honor of representing them in the various institutions.

Who can propose ideas, projects, and topics to integrate and improve the various programs, and thus advance and evolve your system? Literally anyone can submit any idea or project to DirectDemocracyS, both internationally, through this contact form at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/infos-contacts/proposals

But also at the continental, national, and local levels, using the contact form for the various continents, countries, and geographic areas. Please specify in the previous contact form whether the proposals, ideas, and projects are for the various programs and which geographic area they are intended for. Alternatively, you can contact one of our continental, national, or local organizations, depending on your needs, by selecting the contact form category based on your citizenship and residence, at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/groups-contacts/world-contacts

Always specify if the request is a proposal. We remind you that existing users, regardless of their type, are encouraged to access the dedicated contact website by entering your credentials, which are the same username and password you use on our free website, into the login form. After logging in, you'll receive faster, more complete, and detailed responses than our other visitors.

What happens with the proposals received? They are analyzed by the proposal management group, in one of the various subgroups based on the user type, or by the proposal analysis group, by our visitors. If the proposer is an official member of ours, they can automatically request and obtain an official representative profile (partially public) and create their own working group, together with our official members who wish to collaborate on the development of the idea or project. If they don't know anyone to create the group, many of our members will surely want to join the respective group, which will be published in a group for new ideas and projects, along with the proposed idea or project, and will soon join the respective group. If necessary, new, more specific groups will soon be created by the members of the respective working group, who have also become official representatives, to allow for more detailed, comprehensive, professional, and secure work, with human and technological bridges for everyone to communicate and collaborate. It is recommended not to create groups that are too large in terms of number of members, to allow everyone to always have a leading role.

What if the person submitting an idea is a simple visitor who hasn't joined us, or isn't a user or official member? No idea or project is discarded, but rather analyzed and evaluated based on various criteria. The best ideas will be chosen based on their importance and usefulness, assigning varying degrees of urgency and priority. In the groups for new ideas, projects, and proposals, various discussions will take place, and many of our members will be able to analyze the various ideas and contact the author of the respective proposal. Our visitors can choose to join us, or collaborate externally, or even have nothing to do with us, simply by submitting their proposal. If they join us as official members, they can continue the project development directly, according to the previous rules, creating their own working groups as an official representative. Good ideas bring important insights, which are very useful to our activities. If they don't wish to be our members, they can still stay in touch with our groups, which will develop their proposals.

How do I get credit for an idea or project, and therefore, can a proposal be named after the person who conceived, conceived, and brought it to fruition? To ensure credit for a proposal, we recommend anyone become an official member. The reason is simple but very important: collective ownership of our entire system, in addition to numerous advantages and benefits, allows access to a potentially infinite number of groups. This access to restricted areas allows you to check whether your idea and project have already been submitted and whether working groups are already developing your idea. If a working group for a proposal already exists, you can apply, and if you meet all the requirements, you can be admitted to the respective groups. Based on your concrete contribution, the final proposal will be voted on according to very detailed implementation rules. In this way, based on your active and direct participation in the respective groups, you will receive personal and group points, which are the best recognition for your work because they provide numerous advantages and benefits. If your proposal hasn't yet been submitted and is original, you can become an official member and create a main working group to discuss, improve, and finalize your personal proposal. You can use your name or surname (or, to remain anonymous, your nickname or username) to submit your idea. This will obviously result in a higher number of points, as it is an original activity. To avoid wasting time and precious resources, and because it is fair and just, DirectDemocracyS creates a single working group for each idea, at each level, based on very detailed implementation rules. This group can also create numerous subgroups, connected by human and technological bridges, to enable collective, orderly, organized, safe, secure, and coordinated work, while ensuring proper recognition for the original creator of each idea. We recommend becoming an official member to ensure, through personal verification, that your proposal is truly unique and original, and to obtain authorship, credit, recognition, and appropriate rewards. Lower-tier users, or even simple visitors, cannot verify and directly implement the various ideas and projects, as they lack access to our reserved areas, which are tailored to their specific user types . Simply put, we reward only our members, and therefore collectively own our entire system, and we allow only our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, to vote on all our decisions and elections, which are binding and official, for our entire system. Strict adherence to our shared rules is what allows us to protect the equality of all our members. Our inclusivity is not without criteria; on the contrary, it is precisely through our shared adherence to these standards that we ensure that no one is excluded and that every participant's voice has the same, invaluable value. This isn't discrimination, but rather the need to protect our system and everyone who participates in it. Anyone who requests it, if they meet all the requirements, can join us, even by creating a free personal profile, with no obligation to be present or volunteer. Any of our free users, if they wish and meet all the requirements, can request to become a registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity, and thus become part of our truly and fully shared leadership, voting on everything, in a manner binding on our system. Any user with a verified identity can request, and if they meet all the requirements, can obtain, the status of official member. This, through a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual action, allows them to collectively own our entire system and have various types of profiles, based on our rules. Therefore, literally anyone can be part of our system, as long as they respect all our rules, which are collectively decided and respected by everyone, and which in turn are based on individual proposals, implemented in many groups. DirectDemocracyS is a system created, managed, and controlled collectively, so it's difficult to find flaws, and if there are any, everyone can directly contribute to changing and improving the world through our system.

Continue Reading →

Our programs and activities must be carefully studied, and with the right mindset, to be understood and to evaluate their potential. First, we divide the activities of our system into various programs, even though, according to our rules, they all have different phases, which are based on their types, the times in which they are implemented, the ways in which they are implemented, and the places where they are implemented.

The typologies are numerous and well documented in our informational articles, while the timing varies based on the various priorities. The ways in which they are implemented are explained in our rules, while the locations have different importance. The exact order of locations is: international, continental, national, and local, from largest to smallest, and as we will see with our micro-groups, also vice versa, that is, from the smallest territory to the largest. The reason is very simple: while there are traditional, vertical hierarchies, even based on the larger size, there is a perfect balance, with bottom-up, horizontal hierarchies, which allows us to have shared rules that are enforced by everyone, at all times.

The above sentences will frighten those who don't know us, who won't understand their meaning, but we can assure you that everything has impeccable motivations.

Since mid-May 2026, we have started publishing some of our national programmes, based on the decisions of our organisations in the various countries.

We need to explain to you how these programs were created, so you can better understand our system and the enormous collective work we do.

Our international teams of human specialists, using the latest technology, have created a comprehensive international program, which is used at every international stage, and at every continental stage, adapting it to the specificities of each continent.

Ours is an authentic democracy: competence as a collective duty

It's important to clarify a common misunderstanding: at DirectDemocracyS, the "specialist filter" is not a separate or external entity, but rather all of our official members. Each of our members, based on their declared, documented, verified, and constantly tested and updated expertise, is an integral part of our specialist groups.

Our system isn't a political program written on paper and forgotten. It's living organizational software. Because our technologies, starting with allddsAI, constantly learn from new data and new challenges, our programs are also updated, adapted, and refined daily. What you read today is the result of this constant evolution: a system that, thanks to your participation, becomes more efficient, more equitable, and better able to respond to the world's real needs every day.

There is no distinction between "leaders" and "rank-and-file": a widespread network of knowledge is activated based on the sector of intervention. If one of our official members possesses expertise in a specific field, that knowledge is systematized and validated. This means that every choice, every program, and every activity of DirectDemocracyS is not the result of subjective opinion or political expediency, but is based exclusively on true, accurate, factual information documented by reliable sources, analyzed by those trained to understand and apply it.

Ours is, therefore, an authentic and comprehensive democracy of knowledge: because each member contributes their verified expertise, the decision-making process enjoys a technical depth inaccessible to traditional representative models. We do not rely on electoral promises, but on the power of verified data. In DirectDemocracyS, citizens are not simply passive voters called upon to choose from options predefined by others, but active participants who, with their professionalism, contribute to building, verifying, and validating the collective program. It is this combination of democratic participation and technical rigor that makes our system the only tool truly capable of governing the complexity of the contemporary world without errors, corruption, or propaganda.

In DirectDemocracyS, the filter of specialists isn't a limit to democracy, but rather its guarantee of authenticity. To understand this balance, we must stop seeing democracy as a mere numerical count (the "gut vote") and begin to see it as a system for managing reality.

This is how the filter of specialists enables, rather than hinders, democracy.

1. The Paradox of Competence and Authentic Democracy

"Traditional" democracy often fails because it confuses popular legitimacy with operational capacity. A people can vote for a direction (for example, "we want clean energy"), but if the technical choice to achieve it is flawed, the result will be economic or social disaster.

At DirectDemocracyS, we operate on a clear distinction:

Sovereignty belongs to the Community: Direction, ethics, desire for change, and final approval remain in the hands of the official members. Shared leadership decides where to go.

Technology is for the Specialists: Getting there efficiently, sustainably, and free of corruption is a task that requires professional analysis.

The filter of specialists doesn't "vote for the people," but selects viable options for the people to vote on. This transforms democracy from a blind choice between slogans to an informed choice between validated projects.

2. Why the expert vote is the heart of stability

The vote or approval of specialists is essential for three critical reasons:

Anti-Corruption Filter: Corruption in external systems often arises from the confusion between private interests and public management. DirectDemocracyS specialists operate in a system where their decisions are tracked, tested by our AI (ddsAI), and based on defined collective well-being parameters. They cannot "sell" a project because it must be vetted by other specialists, working groups, and algorithmic analyses.

Macroeconomic Parameter Protection: Many popular proposals, though well-intentioned, would be harmful if implemented incompetently (for example, printing money or creating unsustainable bonuses). Specialists ensure that each initiative is compatible with economic reality, protecting the most vulnerable groups who are often the first victims of incompetent policies.

Reducing Uncertainty: In a complex system, "truth" is not an opinion. If a water or urban planning project has structural flaws, it's not a matter of "democratic preference," but of physics and engineering. The expert doesn't have an opinion, but a technical responsibility to certify that the project works.

3. Balance: Experts are not a "Caste"

This is the crucial part for our authentic democracy: specialists are not an external elite, but members of the system.

They are not chosen by political appointment, but by demonstrated competence in the areas of work.

Their work is transparent and validated. If a group of specialists proposes something that doesn't meet the system's criteria or ignores the needs of the population, that work is corrected or rejected by other working groups and cross-checked by other organizations (national or continental).

Every official member, if he acquires the necessary skills, can become a specialist. The system is not closed: it is a social elevator based on preparation.

4. The Function of Technologies (ddsAI)

The filter isn't just human. When a specialist analyzes a program, it's immediately compared with allddsAI simulations. The human expert adds ethical sensitivity and understanding of the social context; technology provides risk calculations and projections.

The perfect balance is here: the human provides the intention, the technology provides the reality check.

In summary

The expert vote is important because, in DirectDemocracyS, the power to decide without expertise is the first step towards irresponsibility.

Ours is a "Democracy of Reality": we don't want to win elections with empty promises; we want to transform society by solving real problems. To do this, democracy must be equipped. The filter of specialists is our "equipment": it ensures that, when our community votes, the program it approves is solid, achievable, and beneficial to all, without discrimination.

In this way, democracy ceases to be a stage for propaganda and finally returns to being a tool for collective construction.

Based on the international program, our continental groups of human specialists, with the help of the best technologies, on each continent, have created a general continental program, which is used in each of our continental phases, and each national phase, adapting it to the specificities of each country, each continent.

Based on the international program, the continental program, our national groups of human specialists, with the help of the best technologies, in each country, on each continent, have created a general national program, which is used in each of our national phases, adapting it to the specificities of each country, on each continent.

Based on the international program, the continental program, and the various national programs, our local groups of human specialists, with the help of the best technologies, in every geographical, territorial, administrative, and electoral subdivision, from the largest to the smallest, of each country, on each continent, have created a general local program, which is used in each of our local phases, adapting it to the specificities of each urban or rural area.

In addition to the great work of our experts at a general level, for each specific topic and sector, our specialists have created, at every level, in every phase, many working groups, to propose, discuss, decide, choose, test, vote, and make available in the various groups, the various activities and programs.

You may have noticed that we talk about human and technological specialists, because our human work must always be analyzed and evaluated by all our technologies, which are primarily: ddsAI, our official Artificial Intelligence, collectively owned by our system and all our official members. Thanks to our democracy project, all existing Artificial Intelligences, integrated into allddsAI, both directly and through human bridges, also perform proactive activities to efficiently and intelligently solve any possible problem, professionally. Our groups of human specialists, in turn, analyze, evaluate, and APPROVE the work of our technologies.

But obviously, not only our human specialists and our technologies are involved in these important activities, but all our official members, based on their respective expertise, and based on their respective residences and citizenships, can propose activities, ideas, projects, and programs to integrate, and if possible improve, previous work.

We're often asked why we don't entrust everything to AI or limit ourselves to human management alone. Our answer lies in the method: humans bring the ethical vision, cultural context, and moral responsibility; our AIs (ddsAI and allddsAI) bring the data processing capabilities, macroeconomic model analysis, and long-term impact projections. Our system is not an alternative to human intelligence, but rather its enhancement. The final approval, which remains human, guarantees that no algorithm can ever replace the collective will of our official members.

But what happens if one of our official members isn't an expert on a topic, but has a brilliant idea, or presents a program in a professional manner? It would be wrong to ignore good ideas, so literally for every idea from every official member, we create a working group with other people who possibly have similar expertise or ideas, and we try to present the idea, project, or program in a detailed and professional manner. This work takes place in our free groups, in reserved areas of our websites, and on our platforms. Our specialists will then analyze, review, and possibly integrate and improve the proposals. Finally, if deemed useful, they will approve them and incorporate them into our programs.

But why is such a procedure necessary? Because every activity in DirectDemocracyS requires expertise, and while each of our official members can pursue ideas, projects, activities, and programs, bringing them to fruition requires the expertise and professionalism of our human and technological experts. Good ideas aren't enough if they don't benefit the public, whether internally or externally, without any form of discrimination. In all other systems, we see the damage, often very serious, caused by a lack of professionalism, or by programs that serve the interests of a few, or by corruption. DirectDemocracyS as a system must empower professionals to analyze, evaluate, and approve. This does not take away the voting power of our shared leadership, nor the power of choice of our collective ownership. Everything, based on its importance, with very detailed voting rules, must be approved by our users with verified and guaranteed identities, based on their residence and citizenship.

Let me explain. For international, and therefore global, decisions, based on the importance of the decision to be made binding on all, all those entitled to vote vote and decide together. Only those with a verified and guaranteed identity can vote, to prevent multiple votes, fake profiles, fronts, and other unfair methods. In all civilized countries, to cast your vote, the first thing you must do is be identified. In DirectDemocracyS, the right to vote is binding on our system and on those who participate in it. This decisive vote is obtained after identification through very detailed implementation rules, which still allow for virtually total anonymity, and even invisibility. To vote, always look for the blue check mark next to your username in our social media area on our websites. The vote of those with the blue check mark next to their username, in our social area, on our websites, on our platforms, is legal, valid, and therefore binding. However, in their respective groups and restricted areas, all our users, of all types, can vote and decide. Their vote, even if expressed in these "reserved areas, and therefore invisible to others," is not binding on our system, nor on those who are part of it. However, it is valid , advisory, and even useful for certain activities, even from a statistical point of view, in certain areas.

Every decision, every vote, and every technical validation step within our system is documented. This means that, at any time, it's possible to reconstruct the progress of a proposal: who submitted it, which specialists evaluated it, which tests it passed with ddsAI, and how our community voted. This radical transparency is our best defense against the opacity and manipulation typical of traditional systems.

For continental decisions, residents, or citizens, of one country on each continent vote. Obviously, if a person has two or more citizenships, from two or more countries, from two or more continents, they will be able to vote in two or more continents, based on their right to vote and run for office in two or more countries.

The same rules apply to national and local decisions, based on citizenship and habitual residence, where one lives at least six months of the year. Let's explain this important concept further. DirectDemocracyS is a unique system, united in diversity, with the right people in the right places, in which each of our official members is the true protagonist and collective owner of the entire system. However, fair and equitable local autonomy exists and is guaranteed, while respecting the rules, methodologies, and instructions of the larger phases. Simply put, every country, and every local area, has enormous potential, because it is right and fair that it should be so.

International programs are voted on by everyone; continental programs are voted on by those who live in or are citizens of a country or countries, or of a continent or continents. At the national level, citizens of each country, residents abroad, and even non-citizens vote according to national rules. In many countries and local subdivisions, there are reserved voting groups for all foreign citizens working legally, in each country and local subdivision, and in some countries, there are voting groups even for those without a residence permit or who are not working. But while we always recommend allowing anyone residing in a given area to participate in many activities and therefore to cast their vote, these are decisions that are made locally, chosen in collaboration with our national organizations.

Our national organizations communicate, coordinate, support, authorize, and monitor all the various local organizations, from the largest to the smallest, which are unique, united, and indivisible. The only ones that can have multiple groups in the same urban or rural area are micro-groups. However, they can then unite, if they wish, if requested by their respective local and national organizations, and if necessary, to create a single local organization within their respective local subdivisions, such as a street block or neighborhood.

Only in cases where a microgroup has neighbors who aren't on good terms, or if there are too many official members (to ensure everyone is involved), can you decide to create separate groups within the same geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area. The various microgroups or official organizations, even if separate, will still be united in the next larger local organization, up to national ones, and depending on the type of user, including continental and international.

Very important explanation.

The international, continental, national, and local phases, along with the various micro-groups, are ongoing and concurrent, but each is moving forward with various activities, based on identical rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations, but with many fair and equitable local autonomies. For example, not all of our national organizations want to have a presence outside of our system; some prefer to conduct all their activities exclusively on our platforms. This is one of the reasons why we don't have presentation pages or groups on various social networks, apps, and external websites. While we could create an external information presence, no one is obligated to do so, and not everyone does so at the same time; others prefer to wait, and others have decided not to have external representation for now. We have made several hundred public pages available, including to our visitors, as well as some groups, even in various languages. We will soon be creating public pages in English for each country, and also for some local subdivisions, in addition to those in their respective languages. This will allow each country and territory to be visible to our visitors, offering them exclusive and exclusive previews of certain news, information, results, and announcements, and even discussions with our visitors, through various technological means.

We proceed similarly with our general, international, continental, national, and local programs. Each of our organizations has begun, at the right time, the creation of general and topic-specific programs, in a very detailed, competent, and professional manner. The publication of the various materials is carried out according to very detailed implementation rules, initially secretly, then confidentially within the various groups, then visible on pages for registered users. Subsequently, if and when each of our organizations wishes, they will make their content public to our visitors, in the manner and at the times agreed upon together.

Only then, if, when, and how they wish, can they, based on authorizations, make certain information public, even outside our platforms.

But how are these programs decided, and by whom? Each of our official members, based on their expertise, is part of specialist groups at various levels: international, continental, national, and local, from the largest to the smallest. Within their respective groups, they propose, discuss, select, test, and vote on various topics, programs, and activities. All this collective work is complemented by various ideas and decisions at various levels. Let's look at some examples. In national organizations, the work of continental and international organizations is taken into account. In local organizations, the activities and decisions of national, continental, and international organizations are taken into account. For example, if a country in DirectDemocracyS has a good idea, it can be integrated, adapted, and improved in its own country. So, in many cases, you will see programs with similar content, similar solutions, and similar rules. This methodology applies to our entire system. In practice, good ideas must be exploited by all those who join us. Some countries have specific rules, solutions suited to their own circumstances. However, there are certain imposed rules that apply to everyone. Everything must be based on truth, on reality, taking into account the interests of the entire global, continental, national, and local population. Situations must change and improve, basing everything on logic, common sense—we repeat, on truth, reality, on study, on expertise—without worsening macroeconomic parameters, without worsening citizens' living conditions, and possibly without increasing the tax burden for middle- and low-income groups. Our programs are not propaganda; they do not give away money, bonuses, and wealth to those unwilling to contribute to the collective well-being. And every idea, project, and new law must be a collective effort, proposed, chosen, tested, voted on, and implemented by everyone, or by as many people as possible, but always on the basis of expertise, with an informed, open, and motivated vote, and with full responsibility for any consequences.

At DirectDemocracyS, power is not an end in itself: it is inextricably linked to responsibility. Each of our official members, by casting their vote, declares that they understand the issue, have consulted the technical analyses, and are ready to assume responsibility for the consequences of their choice. We do not seek easy consensus; we seek informed consensus, based on the truth of the facts and the desire to actively contribute to the collective well-being.

It's crucial to understand that security in DirectDemocracyS isn't just protectionist, it's proactive. Our identity architecture, which guarantees external anonymity, simultaneously ensures the absolute integrity of internal data. Every decision-making transaction, from the proposal stage to the final vote, is protected by validation protocols that exclude any unauthorized external interference. We don't just count votes: we verify the validity of the right to express oneself in real time, making the manipulation that plagues electoral dynamics in the outside world technically impossible.

Finally, a crucial point: DirectDemocracyS doesn't depend on electoral cycles based on political expiration. Our system is permanent. We don't wait for elections to implement change; our activities, programs, and integrations run 365 days a year. Being an official member doesn't mean delegating power for years, but participating in a continuous process of improving the reality we live in. Those seeking a quick fix or an immediate bonus won't find a place here; those seeking the solid, methodical, and shared construction of a more equitable future will find in us the complete infrastructure to make it happen.

If you're curious to learn more about our programs, perhaps offering your own ideas, projects, and constructive suggestions, simply visit our websites and platforms, and use the contact form to let us know what you think. We look forward to hearing from you.

Continue Reading →

Welcome to DirectDemocracyS: Discover our alternative

Have you been invited to meet us and want to understand who we are? Here are the key points of our project:

• Who we are: We are a network of people working to improve the world through clear rules, transparency, and active participation. We are not a political party, but an organization focused on the common good.
• Our "Home": We operate exclusively on our collectively owned platforms. We choose not to operate on external social networks to remain free, neutral, independent, and secure.
• Micro-Groups: Technology isn't enough. We create physical connections across the community (in groups of up to 1,000-3,000 people) to foster collaboration between neighbors, friends, and acquaintances, breaking down the barriers of shyness and digital distance.
• Three steps to get started:
  1. Study: Read our https://www.directdemocracys.org/ to see if our vision aligns with yours.
  2. Choose: You can join us, take your time studying, or decide we're not for you. We'll always respect your choice.
  3. Get Involved: If you decide to join, use the link or QR code provided by your representative for priority processing and dedicated support.
• No obligation: Creating a personal profile is free and requires no attendance or forced volunteering. It's a way to verify, from the inside, that we are exactly who we describe ourselves to be.
• Constant support: You'll never be left alone. Our system is designed to educate you, assist you with technology, and make every member a protagonist.

Want to learn more? Read the full text below for all the technical details, rules, and underlying rationale behind our system.

Welcome to DirectDemocracyS

Maybe you've received an invitation from one of our official representatives, a flyer, a social media message, or an email, and you want to understand who we really are.

This is the intermediate version of our presentation, a little more detailed than the previous one: comprehensive enough to allow you to understand the basics of our system, but easier and quicker to read than our technical and detailed articles.

If after reading this you want to delve deeper into every rule, methodology, and complete explanation, you'll also find links to our more in-depth content.

Who we are

DirectDemocracyS is an innovative system based on:

• real participation;
• collaboration;
• transparency;
• clear rules;
• mutual respect;
• protection from tampering;
• responsible use of technology.

We are not a traditional political party.

We are an organized network of people who want to improve the world in a concrete, logical, and gradual way, focusing on the common good, collaboration, and individual responsibility.

Our goal is not to promise miracles, but to build a truly functional, stable, and useful system for people.

Because we operate mainly on our own platforms

We have chosen to conduct almost all of our activities on our official platforms.

The motivation is simple:
we want to remain free, independent, neutral, organized, and safe.

Our platforms are built and managed to enable:

• orderly collaboration;
• data protection;
• transparent checks;
• efficient organization;
• direct communication;
• reduction of manipulation and misinformation.

We don't prevent anyone from using other social networks or tools, but we prefer that real work be done in an environment designed specifically for our system.

Official website:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/

An open system to study

One of our fundamental characteristics is this:

We don't ask for blind trust.

Instead, we ask you to:

• study;
• verify;
• observe;
• evaluate personally.

Much of our information content is public and can be accessed without registration.

We have hundreds of articles, explanations, audio and video content available in various languages.

If you don't speak English, you can use the automatic translation system on the site.

If you prefer to start with the videos:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/videos/ 

Your 3 options

Once you have learned about our system you always have three options:

1. Join us

If you share our goals and methodologies, you can start the journey with us.

2. Study again

Many people prefer to take a moment to investigate before making a decision.

It is an absolutely respected choice.

3. Deciding that we are not right for you

Not all people share our vision, our rules, or our method.

This choice will always be respected.

No initial obligation

Creating a free personal profile:

• does not require payments;
• does not require physical presence;
• does not impose forced volunteerism;
• does not require immediate action.

The free profile is mainly used for:

• know the system from the inside;
• participate gradually;
• understand if you can really trust us;
• concretely evaluate the functioning of our activities.

In practice:
you will be able to personally verify whether what we describe publicly is actually applied in reality.

Human support is essential

You will not be left alone.

One of the most important aspects of our system is mutual support.

Our support groups and official representatives help new users:

• to understand how the system works;
• to use the platforms;
• to participate in activities;
• to integrate gradually.

We believe that everyone should be able to participate, even without great initial technological skills.

Micro-groups: our real presence on the territory

DirectDemocracyS doesn't want to exist only online.

For this reason we organize territorial micro-groups:

• in the cities;
• in the neighborhoods;
• in rural areas;
• in local territories.

We generally prefer relatively small groups, consisting of:

• neighbors;
• friends;
• family members;
• acquaintances;
• people who live in the same area.

Why?

Why groups that are too large often:

• they isolate the shyest people;
• make participation difficult;
• they foster chaos;
• they prevent real collaborations.

Micro-groups instead allow:

• direct dialogue;
• concrete collaboration;
• mutual support;
• more efficient organization;
• greater participation by all.

Meetings can take place:

• in person;
• via video conferences;
• or in mixed mode.

The goal is to truly collaborate, not just message online.

Learn more about microgroups (in various categories and articles, by clicking on the titles):

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/micro-groups/

Registration and invitations

In some cases you may receive:

• a personal link;
• a QR code;
• a direct invitation from one of our official representatives.

These systems allow:

• faster procedures;
• direct support;
• priority access;
• better organization.

This is not about discrimination.

It simply serves to:

• avoid organizational chaos;
• manage growth properly;
• welcome each new member.

Do you really want to go deeper?

This is just an introductory and simplified version.

Full explanations of our system include:

• detailed rules;
• operational methodologies;
• security systems;
• internal organization;
• functioning of the groups;
• public activities;
• technical explanations;
• philosophical and practical motivations.

If you want to gain a deeper understanding of DirectDemocracyS, we also recommend reading our more comprehensive and detailed content.

Main introductory article:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/

Videos in various languages:

 https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/videos/

Article on mandatory explanations:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-administration/mandatory-explanations/

Rules and useful links:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/rules-and-useful-links/

Further explanations and reasons:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-equality-and-meritocracy/being-on-the-right-side/

If you decide to study our system with an open mind, patience, and attention, you will gradually understand why many people consider DirectDemocracyS a profoundly innovative project and an alternative to traditional systems.

Have you received a flyer, email, social media, or app from one of our official representatives inviting you to study DirectDemocracyS? Curious to learn more?

Perfect, you're in the right place to get all the information you need and all the direct, hands-on support you'll ever need. Our contact management group, our group for prospective users, and many other groups are at your complete disposal. In short, you'll never be left alone.

To fully study our system, you need desire, and both you and us also need patience, goodwill, and time to spend together. But in the end, you'll surely understand our innovation, which is an alternative to everything you know, and you'll grasp our enormous potential. We have hundreds of informative articles published, visible to everyone, including our visitors. You don't have to join us to study our system; just visit our platforms and websites. This may seem strange to you; you're probably wondering: why do we do almost no activity outside of our platforms? We'll answer you right away. We like to always be free, independent, neutral, orderly, organized, and completely protected. For these reasons, we've invested time, resources, and money into building our "big house," which has all the potential needed to do great work. Our platforms are collectively owned by all our official members, and this alone explains why we do almost no activity outside of someone else's.

To determine if you're interested in, and subsequently if you like, DirectDemocracyS, you need to be open-minded and carefully read our welcome article on our official website at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/

If you don't speak English, simply click "-English-" in our translation module and select your preferred language from the drop-down menu. You'll see all the English content automatically translated. We also have content, informational articles, videos, and audio in all world languages, including many dialects. In those cases, we recommend disabling automatic translation, as it's no longer necessary for content in your language.

If you prefer to watch and listen, you can go to this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/videos/

Just choose the videos in your preferred language, and you will be able to listen to some important and interesting information.

You now have three options, and three choices to make, and we guarantee we will respect your decision. The first is to join us, and you will receive all the help you need. The second is to wait and study our system more thoroughly. The third, which we don't hope for, but which is still possible, is that you don't like our goals, our rules, our methodologies, our instructions, and our motivations. These will allow us to achieve all these goals, which are primarily to change and improve the world, for the common good, without discrimination.

If you're unsure, we recommend reading this informative article carefully. It may help you understand some key features so you can make an informed choice between the three options:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-equality-and-meritocracy/being-on-the-right-side/ 

If you choose to join us, we'd be delighted. Simply complete the registration form, which will connect you directly to our official representative who contacted you on our behalf. Do not use the generic registration link if you've already received a unique link to the registration form, or if you've received a QR code. Scanning the QR code will take you to the unique URL for the registration form, which, once completed and submitted, will connect you directly to our official representative.

Very brief explanation.

Anyone can join us at any time using the general registration form, which is almost always available to everyone, except during certain periods when we are forced to completely block new registrations without invitations. Anyone who receives a unique link or QR code from one of our official representatives to use a registration form, which connects them directly to our representative, will enjoy numerous advantages and benefits. They will skip waiting lists and be activated with priority over those without our invitation. This isn't discrimination, but rather protection of our system and its members. The rationale is simple: to prevent the chaos created by too many people joining us at once. This method allows us to optimally accommodate new members, even if it forces us to postpone some new registrations to a later date.

For all the information and explanations, we recommend you carefully study this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-administration/mandatory-explanations/

From the article in the previous link, we take some sentences that answer two fundamental questions.

What do you need to join us?

You'll need to choose a username according to our rules. Your username is the name we'll call you in our system. It can be a nickname, a random code, or even your real first and last name, although we recommend remaining completely anonymous, at least in your personal profile.

You will need to choose a password of at least 12 characters, with letters that do not form words, both lowercase and uppercase, non-consecutive numbers, and special characters.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

What do you need to join us?

A valid, adequately protected personal email address from any email service provider. Any email address will do. It doesn't have to be a temporary email address, because after completing registration and submitting the form, you'll receive an activation link to your email address. You can click it or copy and paste it into any browser to confirm your email address.

A valid personal telephone number, to which you will receive a unique activation code, which you must send to us via email so that we can activate your personal profile.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

You'll have realized that there are no special requirements to create a free personal profile, with no obligation to be present or to volunteer with us. The free profile doesn't unlock all our capabilities, but it does allow you to participate in a wide range of activities with us, and it allows you to determine, without spending money or obligations, whether you can trust us and our system. We don't ask for your complete and immediate trust, but we do ask you to verify and judge for yourself whether what we say is actually implemented as we present it. In short, you'll see that on the inside, we are exactly as we describe ourselves, and as you see us from the outside.

For some basic rules in brief, and some very useful links, you can go to this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/rules-and-useful-links

We will decide the next steps together with you.

Our micro-groups.

A system like DirectDemocracyS cannot depend solely on the Internet, electricity, or technology. While we authorize, manage, document, and verify all our activities on our platforms, we, together with our official representatives, create micro-groups in urban or rural areas, with up to 1,000 inhabitants, which are our physical presence in the various territories.

But why areas with up to 1,000 inhabitants, and not larger? Because these microgroups should be made up of relatives, friends, neighbors, or simply acquaintances, or even strangers, who live nearby. From our previous experience, we've noticed that groups with too many members don't allow the various individualities to express themselves fully. With too many members, those who are shy or less tech-savvy are often left behind and unable to reach their full potential. For these reasons, while not imposing overly strict limits (no one will ban a microgroup with more than 1,000 users, as long as it doesn't exceed the limits of decency, i.e., no more than 3,000), we actually prefer to divide a microgroup of 1,000 members into various subgroups, based on the members' wishes, with different sections, categories, specific tasks, and distinct roles. DirectDemocracyS's fundamental rule is to make everyone a protagonist. Although there are no limits on the number of members at certain local, national, continental, and international levels, for other types of groups, we prefer not to exceed 3,000 members. Instead, we create a greater number of groups with similar tasks, roles, and specific characteristics, perhaps connected by human bridges (connecting members present in two or more groups), and also connected by our technological means, on our platforms.

Microgroups allow us physical connections that make our system stronger and more resilient. We don't need expensive offices and unnecessary staff; we meet on the streets, in squares, in public spaces, in parks, on the beach, and wherever our members decide. Those who struggle with technology will be supported and trained to do excellent work in person and on our platforms. Whether we decide things together, looking each other in the eye, or via video conferences (if it's raining or too cold or too hot outside), the important thing is to communicate, collaborate, and do good work, all together, for the common good. This sense of community, based on clear rules respected by all, and truly functional methodologies, with all the necessary safety measures and protection from manipulation, fake news, and traditional media (while still allowing anyone to use and consult other platforms), is the best way to make our enormous mechanism work.

We have many informative articles regarding micro-groups, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/micro-groups/

Choose the category, and if available, the subcategory (by clicking on the various titles), and then click on the titles of the various informational articles to read their entire content.

How can you join micro-groups?

Our official representative, along with all our support groups, will provide you with all the information and practical assistance, whether you want to join one of the micro-groups near you, or act as human bridges by participating in two or more micro-groups. You can even create your own micro-group after obtaining an official representative profile and participating in your new official representative training groups, reserved for all our official members. Simple explanation: our official representative will invite you to the micro-group near you, according to very detailed but also very simple implementation rules. Simply accept the invitation in the social area of our free website. You will then receive further instructions.

Continue Reading →

Welcome to DirectDemocracyS.

This is our informative article for anyone who receives the invitation to study our system comprehensively, with an open mind, therefore without being superficial and without making hasty judgments.

Our system is robust and detailed to protect the community, but the user experience is seamless and guided.

Although it may seem like a complicated system, we can assure you that with a little attention and willingness, everything is very simple, fast, and secure. From the very beginning, you'll receive all the necessary information, all the direct and ongoing support you need, and all the instructions you need to complete a wide range of activities with us.

The first question someone asks when receiving a flyer or message from us is always the same: can I trust them? Our answer to everyone is always the same. You shouldn't trust anything or anyone, now or ever. Therefore, if you like what we're doing, how we're doing it, and if you feel compatible and competent, we invite you to join us by registering with a free, completely anonymous personal profile, so you can see for yourself that what we've always said, to everyone, is actually applied internally. We don't ask for your trust, we ask for your intelligence. See for yourself whether our actions match our words.

The second thing that surprises you is that none of us are inviting you to join us. We have a fundamental rule that demonstrates our esteem and respect. First, we always ask you to be fully informed, with an open mind to our innovation, which is an alternative to everything you know. We ask you not to be superficial, and therefore not to make hasty final judgments before fully understanding our enormous potential. We don't invite anyone to join us directly, because it must be your conscious and informed choice. In short, we invite everyone to study all our public information, exclusively on our platforms.

The third thing you'll immediately notice: the complexity of our entire system. The world is not a simple place, and even though our main features and pioneering solutions are relatively simple, making them work optimally requires very detailed implementation rules that address every tiny aspect. Don't be afraid, practice and, above all, mutual understanding will make everything simpler, faster, and much safer. To determine whether you like our system and whether you're compatible with our rules, simply read our informative article on the home page of our websites. The rest of this study will help you enter our system prepared, preventing any potential errors.

Perhaps the most important thing, and one that not everyone immediately understands, is that DirectDemocracyS is a collective project, designed to make it impossible for any one person, or group of people, to use it in despicable ways. Simply put, we are perhaps the only ones created for the collective good, incapable of being corrupted by power, by lobbies, and by individuals—rich, powerful, or famous. We can never be dictators, precisely because of our system architecture, created by specialized engineers who have made our system different and better than all others. All of us, and all those who join us, have made DirectDemocracyS serve the common good, without discrimination, and not for partisan interests.

Shared leadership and collective ownership, along with many other key characteristics, solve many problems, thanks to our unique and inimitable way of communicating, collaborating, and accomplishing countless tasks together.

Of course, the fourth thing everyone notices is a series of related questions: how much and why do I pay? Is there a minimum attendance requirement? Am I obligated to carry out activities with DirectDemocracyS? Let's answer right away: to join us, to be part of our large family, you must register, creating a one-time personal profile. The type of user you will have depends on various factors, including: your financial means (if you don't have money, you can create a personal profile that is and will always be free), your free time (if you don't have free time, you can create a free personal profile that doesn't require any attendance), and the activities you want to do with us (if you don't want to volunteer with us, you can create a free personal profile, which doesn't require any mandatory activities). Even with a free personal profile, you can do a wide range of activities with us, accumulating significant points, without spending a single cent, without being required to be present, and without any mandatory activities with us, except for those mandatory settings for everyone, which must be done upon first login to protect your personal data. These activities are in the best interest of all our users, and include: 1. two-factor authentication (protects your personal profile); 2. privacy settings (protects your personal data); 3. choosing whether, how, when, and for what to receive our notifications (we recommend setting up system notifications to see the latest news only when you log in to our platforms).

If you want to unlock greater potential, you can choose higher-level user categories, which require a small but crucial annual fee (which guarantees us self-financing, freedom, neutrality, security, and independence), a minimum attendance requirement of at least 20 minutes per day (which can be achieved through one or more daily logins), or, alternatively, 120 minutes per week (on one or more days, through one or more daily logins). Finally, each higher-level user must perform some volunteer work during their mandatory attendance time to keep our entire enormous mechanism running smoothly. Some money, some time, and some activities, to make our system fully functional, regardless of the number of users/voters we have. Only in this way will we be resilient and avoid problems.

But let's see what concretely we need to do to join us?

You must fill out a simple registration form, independently, or with the help of someone you know in our system . If you don't know anyone, or if you don't want to ask for help from someone you know, we will provide you with a member chosen at random, resident in your country, or with the same citizenship as you.

You can also do everything by yourself, but we recommend that you get help from someone who is authorized to provide support and to officially invite you, because everything will be simpler, faster, and more complete, and you won't risk making small mistakes.

What do you need to join us?

You'll need to choose a username according to our rules. Your username is the name we'll call you in our system. It can be a nickname, a random code, or even your real first and last name, although we recommend remaining completely anonymous, at least in your personal profile.

You will need to choose a password of at least 12 characters, with letters that do not form words, both lowercase and uppercase, non-consecutive numbers, and special characters.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

What do you need to join us?

A valid, adequately protected personal email address from any email service provider. Any email address will do. It doesn't have to be a temporary email address, because after completing registration and submitting the form, you'll receive an activation link to your email address. You can click it or copy and paste it into any browser to confirm your email address.

A valid personal telephone number, to which you will receive a unique activation code, which you must send to us via email so that we can activate your personal profile.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

Here's an informative article that contains some useful links for many activities, and a few quick rules:

https:// free .directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/rules-and-useful-links

Now some useful tips for everyone.

If one of our users, authorized to send invitations, invites you to learn more about our platforms, we recommend doing so. It's free, secure, and you'll surely be pleasantly surprised. Always verify the authorizations of anyone contacting you on behalf of DirectDemocracyS, using this contact form at this link, explaining the situation in detail:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/securities-groups/authorization-verification-group

You will receive a response by email.

Please note: If you are already a member, we recommend you log in to our contact website using the login credentials you set up yourself on our free website.

If you'd like to join us, do so with a simple invitation, or an official one from one of our users authorized to send invitations. You'll enjoy numerous benefits and advantages if someone helps you and offers their full cooperation, even after you've registered and activated your profile. It's very helpful to have a trusted person to help you, in addition to our 24/7 support. If you don't know anyone in our system, or someone you know isn't yet authorized to send invitations, you can still connect with one of our official representatives via a contact form at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/infos-contacts/i-want-to-be-invited

The person will be from your country, preferably close to your home, will speak your language (always specify your preferred language and your primary country in the form), and will help you according to our rules.

We recommend taking advantage of the opportunity to be and remain completely anonymous at all times, and making only your username visible, with no other personal information. You can then, if you wish, share certain information with those you trust most.

In DirectDemocracyS, the blue checkmarks next to the username, in our social area, mean reliability and a verified and guaranteed identity. Therefore, even with the necessary precautions, people who have the blue checkmark are usually more trustworthy than those who do not have the blue checkmark.

In DirectDemocracyS, public areas are used only by our official members, who are part of the management and control groups for public areas. Unauthorized posts in public areas are strictly prohibited. You can engage in a wide range of activities—in groups, pages, events, and many other activities you participate in—without ever using public areas, which are reserved for authorized individuals for reasons of security, order, and organization.

Don't send friend requests without authorization, and don't disturb other users, groups, or other activities to which you're not invited or that aren't within your capabilities. Communication, collaboration, and activities are permitted according to very detailed rules within the various groups; therefore, friend requests are not permitted, and accepting such requests is prohibited. If direct contact is absolutely necessary, you can always request authorization from the support groups.

Don't lie or provide false information on registration forms, contact forms , support request forms, or authorization request forms. Always be honest because our entire community will always be there for you.

Everyone who joins us, regardless of user type, begins accumulating valuable points from the moment they join. This is done individually, but also within various groups and through the various activities they participate in. These points are very important because they create meritocratic hierarchies based on mutual trust. Those with more points have greater "power" than those with fewer, simply because of the various activities they perform, their behavior, and their time as our users. Anyone who lies on registration forms or other forms will not be able to obtain the benefits and privileges offered to those with more points.

Annual fees, attendance requirements, and volunteer activities are only available for higher-level user levels; they don't apply to free and access users. To avoid any misunderstandings, we'll reiterate: there's no charge and no obligation if you decide to join us with a free personal profile. If you need more potential, and if you meet all the requirements, you can request a higher-level user level at any time.

Continue Reading →

 

When we created our DirectDemocracyS system, we decided to always be on the right side, and to do so, we created one of our five special groups, entirely dedicated to logic, common sense, truth, reality, research, consistency, and mutual respect. A long name for fundamental activities that make DirectDemocracyS credible, reliable, loyal, sincere, and with shared official positions.

But let's talk about these official positions right away, because perhaps some, studying our system, might believe that those who join us can somehow be forced to think as they're told. It would be wrong and counterproductive for us to teach anything, to anyone, or to try to manipulate people to change their way of thinking. For DirectDemocracyS and all its members, it's important to learn from everyone who joins us. We apply the same method to our official positions, which are decided by large majorities, based on the importance of the various decisions. There's not just an internal majority that decides, and a minority that opposes, but often, for some official positions, quorums of 66%, 75%, 85%, even 95% are required, and for very important rules and positions, and therefore, for fundamental decisions and positions, even unanimity is required. Let's take a brief but clear example. If we decide to take an official position, determined according to our voting rules, based on the various quorums established by the respective groups, that will be the official position of the entire DirectDemocracyS system. The decision must be supported by everyone, but those who disagree can express themselves freely, distinguishing between "we" and "I." They must implement the decisions of our collective system, out of loyalty and respect for the democratic will, but they can say: "I disagree," and they can continue to work, individually and in groups, to demonstrate the value of their ideas. No one will ever be expelled for what they think, say, demonstrate, or write, if they do so in the appropriate ways, at the right times, and in the right places. This method prevents any internal conflict, any discrimination, and allows everyone to be truly free. This method of managing dissent makes us unique and inimitable, and for us it is a rule, and a fundamental methodology, for implementing unity in diversity.

DirectDemocracyS, through its technological integrations with allddsAI (we are the first and only AI democracy, with technology groups and human bridges), through the interface of our private ddsAI AI model, and above all through our specialist groups, composed of our official members, provides comprehensive, free, neutral, independent, and secure information to all its users, groups, and activities, ensuring a professional system and competent decisions. This is what makes us unique and inimitable, as it solves many of the problems of direct democracy, but also of representative democracy: incompetent decision-making and voting without the basis for optimal choices.

Let's explain this fundamental concept better.

Potentially infinite individual and group freedom, which ends exactly where the freedom of another individual or group begins, is not enough, resulting in pluralism and therefore authentic democracy.

A truly shared leadership, with power developed horizontally , therefore “from the bottom up”, and not even the collective property rights of all our members are enough.

To achieve the best results, completely competent decisions are required, which cannot be achieved without giving everyone who must vote and therefore decide the opportunity to have complete knowledge: 1. knowing the topic, or the candidates, 2. knowing all the various possibilities, and 3. knowing all the expected consequences for each of the possibilities.

How many times in old and failing traditional systems do voters have to decide on a popular referendum (usually politicized and rarely explained independently), or choose political parties (often voting out of habit, family tradition, having been manipulated, and in some cases even lied to, by programs often not fully implemented), or choose people to represent them—chosen not by you, but by their respective political parties, without the opportunity to know them and fully evaluate them? Essentially, you vote for people you've only heard speak for a few minutes, almost never with a cross-examination, and without the opportunity to ask all the questions yourself. In DirectDemocracyS, this doesn't happen, because it's our users/voters, on our platforms, who evaluate, select, and perform all the necessary activities to choose our political representatives. We do this with our political representative selection panels, which all our official members can participate in, with internal election campaigns at all levels, both online and in person, and with our closed online primary elections, which, if successful, allow our political organization to propose the best, most competent, and highly professional candidates.

Brief explanation. In many cases, we've seen candidates who are incompetent, or have actual conflicts of interest, or have a complete lack of meritocracy. This is impossible in DirectDemocracyS precisely because of our implementation rules, which allow everyone to be a protagonist, but only the best to obtain more important roles and greater responsibility. It's not just the rich, powerful, or famous who advance, but only those who truly deserve it. A brief example. We often cite the example of people famous on the internet, with many followers, and in many cases, in many countries, these influencers and "web personalities" often have the best intentions (they want to do a good job), but in many cases have serious shortcomings (they lack the skills to deliver what they promise), which therefore make them incompetent and unsuitable for certain roles. You might say: if they get the votes, they have every right to govern and make laws, and that's true, but the consequences aren't always good for everyone; Therefore, it is much better to have competent people who deserve to obtain important roles and greater responsibility.

Many political forces have elected political representatives, who often then made serious mistakes, even failing to keep their campaign promises. This is impossible at DirectDemocracyS, for simple reasons: 1. Political representatives are selected by our groups, which all our members can join; 2. Internal election campaigns are reserved for all our users with verified identities and members, who are entitled to vote; 3. Closed online primaries are held at various local levels, from the smallest to the largest, and are eliminatory, meaning only those with the most votes advance to the next round, where they will then participate in the actual election campaigns and elections. All our users/voters on our platforms can interact directly with our candidates, continuously. Not only that, we all decide together, each in their own areas of residence and citizenship, on the entire political program. This will then be implemented jointly by our political representatives and our users/voters on our platforms, thanks to comprehensive management and collective control by our voters/users on our platforms, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after the elections. Therefore, the relationship between our voters/users and our political representatives is the freest, most democratic, secure, and professional of all the alternatives to our system.

But why doesn't everyone do as we do? The motivations are tied to the logic of power, wealth, and fame; other political forces are often dominated by lobbies and very powerful, rich, and famous people. They don't simply serve the interests of the community, as ours do. They are often forced to serve the interests of a few, due to a lack of independence and neutrality. None of this can happen in DirectDemocracyS, thanks to shared leadership and collective ownership, which, together with complete management and control over political representatives, and properly informed users/voters, make DirectDemocracyS pioneering, unique, and inimitable. In addition to the control of external forces over the established political forces, there are also power logics with internal and external struggles, which prevent politicians from working for the common good, but force them to defend themselves and attack other political forces and other political representatives, often even those of their own political force. These internal and external struggles do not exist in DirectDemocracyS, because the system itself is designed to prevent such reprehensible behavior. Finally, there's the will. In other political forces, there's a focus on protagonism, with a few leaders and very few governing groups, who wield enormous power. In DirectDemocracyS, everything is equally distributed, but meritocracy is rewarded. This is demonstrated in various ways, especially through accumulated points and the evaluations of our specialist groups, which all our official members can join based on their expertise. When it comes to choosing in our internal, closed online primary elections, we know the points accumulated by each candidate, as well as the evaluations of our specialists, who create actual rankings based on the individual abilities of all the candidates. Obviously, the decisions are made by our authorized users, those with verified and guaranteed identities, demonstrated by the blue check mark next to their username (allowing for anonymity) in our social area and on our platforms. Seeing these rankings makes it easier for the most competent and skilled to win internally and represent us externally, in electoral campaigns and real elections. In all other systems, leaders or ruling groups can be attacked in various ways, damaging entire political forces. In DirectDemocracyS, this is impossible, thanks to shared leadership, collective ownership, and the division of representative roles. Those who carry out political representation activities cannot simultaneously manage our political organization and our system, and vice versa. This eliminates conflicts of interest and prevents the accumulation of power by a few individuals and groups. Even if someone were to attack, even unfairly, or through legal action, blackmail, or other methods, anyone in our system could never pose a threat to the entire system, which would collectively defend each of our members unjustly accused. For us, a person is innocent until the final appeal has been rejected and they have been definitively convicted. This applies both to those within our system and to those outside.

At DirectDemocracyS, programs are decided together—political representatives and our voters/users—on our platforms. They are implemented together, each with their own role, and can be changed, integrated, improved, innovated, and updated, depending on the various situations, by deciding everything together. At this point, everyone will ask: why only on your platforms? Why only your voters/users? On our platforms, our users/voters are protected, properly informed, and do not risk manipulation or ideological brainwashing. It is a safe space for us all to work together. Only our users/voters can manage and control our political representatives, because they are our political representatives, and they represent all of us, who are perhaps the first to assume full responsibility for every consequence of our every decision. Technically, others should also be held accountable: both the political forces and their political representatives, and all those who vote for them. At DirectDemocracyS, this responsibility is comprehensive, collective, and publicly declared. This is true not only of pursuing our own interests, but of all people, without discrimination, whether they voted for us or not. We have no preferences, but we recognize the values of equality and meritocracy, which must be guaranteed to everyone, always together, and continuously. Anyone can join us, and if they meet all the requirements, can be part of our shared leadership and our collective ownership, but they must do so by respecting all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations, which make DirectDemocracyS innovative, alternative, and superior to all others, because it is more equitable, meritocratic, fair, and safe.

We have created a valid, truly functional alternative to all other systems, and for those who feel unrepresented by other political forces and the usual political representatives, our political organization welcomes anyone who wants to join us with the best intentions.

Continue Reading →

In January 2026, many of our visitors asked us for an official position on Greenland, while many of our specialist groups follow all international news with great attention.

Unlike those whose minds are limited by propaganda, manipulation, fake news, and old, failed ideologies, at DirectDemocracyS, we base our work on facts and truth, based on highly intelligent rules. We certainly don't want to offend those who are envious, hateful, resentful, or who disagree with us; we simply note that many people fail to use logic, common sense, pragmatism, and mutual respect. When we say there are people with limited minds, it's because many people have a tendency to listen only to those who say what they want to hear, to see only what they want to see, and to read only what they want to see written. In essence, we harshly criticize those who don't look at the facts, all the facts, from a 360-degree perspective. Lacking a comprehensive view, we define their minds as limited. As we often say, all old systems and all old traditional political forces have a tendency to always want to criticize what their opponents do, sometimes considering them as enemies, and not as people who might have good ideas.

At DirectDemocracyS we have no favorites to defend at all costs, nor adversaries to denigrate no matter what they do, but above all we are indebted to no one, we have no masters, and we have no reverence or fear of always and only telling the truth.

Our consistency from the first word spoken publicly to the last often amazes not only people, but even many Artificial Intelligences, when they have an overview of our project and not limited to a few informative articles.

We don't claim to be always right, but we're certainly not biased; therefore, we can be trusted, because we're rarely wrong.

Our official positions are decided in very detailed ways, and are never the decisions of individuals, but the work of many groups of specialists, and we often vote to decide how we think about everything, and what we say is so clear and detailed that it cannot be interpreted except exactly as we make it public.

Greenland must always and exclusively belong to those who live there, not because we have preferences, but because these are our fundamental rules, and we don't change our minds based on which way the wind blows. We won't repeat everything, but we invite you to carefully study the informative article on ownership at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/the-ownership

But we must follow the developments that see President Trump's United States claiming all of Greenland with great attention, and with the right amount of concern.

To understand our views, you might also find it helpful to read this informative article on our pragmatism, so you can understand our official positions:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/we-are-pragmatic

To clear up any doubts, we need to make a brief but fundamental premise.

For us, individual, group, and peoples' freedom must always be potentially infinite, but it ends exactly where the freedom of another person, group, or people begins. Freedom has the positive consequence of the possibility of implementing democracy. Obviously, the only authentic and complete democracy over time is our DirectDemocracy, that is, direct democracy with voters' continuous management and control over their political representatives.

While we love and respect all people equally, we do not love all political systems equally. Therefore, while we do not hate anyone, none of us loves or supports any kind of dictatorship, or any type of politics, that does not allow for complete freedom. This, as we have said, leads to the creation of credible and free opposition, and thus political pluralism and democracy. We will always support people who, alone, without violent intervention and without external influence, but with determination, peacefully overthrow all dictatorial regimes, anywhere in the world.

We do this not out of hatred, but out of pure survival, even for our own system. In Western countries, which are partially free and only partially democratic during election campaigns (with pluralism, and therefore credible opposition), we as the DirectDemocracyS system, despite great difficulty and numerous attempts to boycott, slow us down, and stop us, could still exist and freely implement our activities and our innovations, completely alternative to all other systems. In dictatorships of any kind, such as the Russian oligarchic dictatorship led by President Putin and his regime oligarchs, or in the Chinese party and single-track thinking, led by President Xi Jinping's Communist Party and its regime bureaucrats, and in all the various dictatorships around the world, DirectDemocracyS would hardly be able to exist or function, simply because the respective dictators would know that for them, our success would mean the end—not physical, but political. To obtain the right to exist in dictatorships, we have foreseen many stages, all very efficient, gradual, and very intelligent, trying to peacefully obtain the right to exist.

To better understand our positions and motivations, we recommend you carefully read this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/questions-and-answers/political-strategy-questions/pro-western

This post on our blog also explains some concepts well at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/utility/blog/freedom-and-democracy-are-non-negotiable

but there are many other informative articles like this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/let-s-talk-about-politics/democracy

this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/our-motivations/serious-political-organization

Greenland, therefore, must remain the exclusive property of its inhabitants, because it is right that it should be so. Unfortunately, international politics, throughout human history, has almost never taken justice, fairness, and reason into account, instead imposing increasingly vague and poorly detailed rules of international law, which have allowed the rule of the strongest, with the victors often humiliating, and humiliating, the weakest. The United Nations is inefficient, slow, and does not represent the people, but the governments of the various countries. It therefore represents the power of the few, and not the power of all, as DirectDemocracyS does. DirectDemocracyS will create within it the World Peoples' Organization, also giving stateless peoples, such as the Kurds and many others, their own elected representatives, not those appointed by the various governments. We have discussed this several times in various informative articles, which we invite you to search for on our websites.

If President Trump has a surgical, albeit completely illegal, plan to remove President Maduro from Venezuela, as we discussed in this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/all-news/world-news/south-america-news/venezuela-news/us-attack-on-venezuela

and at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/all-news/world-news/south-america-news/venezuela-news/arrest-of-president-maduro

In our previous article on President Maduro's arrest, we engaged in an interesting and detailed discussion of international law, which everyone uses for their own self-interest, not as a bastion of justice, but to wage political battles and justify partisan positions, often justifying violence. The hypocrisy and inconsistency of those who are always politicized and biased.

President Trump serves his country's strategic, military, economic, and financial interests, and theoretically each of us would do the same. However, he cannot do one thing: betray his commitments, both within NATO and in diplomatic, economic, and financial relations with the European Union, and fail to uphold the commitments and guarantees given to Ukraine under the Budapest Memorandum. While he is partially right in eliminating dictatorships around the world, and is almost a liberator—provided sovereignty is returned to the respective peoples and the living conditions, freedoms, and democracy of all citizens of liberated countries are improved—if he were to buy, or worse, attack a NATO country, or part of it, he would be a traitor, a hypocrite, and an unreliable person . For us at DirectDemocracyS, his word and his orders would no longer have any value.

It cannot and must not impose anything on anyone, but it must, if it wants, deploy its troops on the island of Greenland, or strengthen those already existing, without permitting itself to steal or dispose of the enormous wealth, which must belong entirely and forever to the people who have lived for centuries in that land so rich and so coveted by all.

But if we were to be pragmatic: it's always better to be part of the United States than China, Russia, or any other dictatorship or authoritarian regime. The European Union, which we have always harshly criticized for being incapable of evolution and overly bureaucratic on the global stage of 2026, is the only credible and fairly fair international position. We believe that despite countless problems and countless mistakes, a common European defense, a genuine economic and financial union, and federalization along the lines of the United States, could be the only hope for survival and prosperity.

The fact that all the old, failed, and hypocritical traditional political forces in Europe, and elsewhere, have consistently blamed the European Union for every law passed that was difficult for citizens to accept has created a hatred, not always justified, for European institutions that have not always been able to explain their motivations. Certain scandals and questionable decisions, coupled with a lack of decision-making ability, have certainly not helped.

If President Trump fails to make the right choices in defending NATO and all its member countries, but instead acts selfishly and treacherously, believing he is doing what is best for his own country, he will have the opposite effect: weakening and delegitimizing the United States, with consequences that will be difficult for everyone to resolve.

A brief answer on our position on a common European army and common defense. Investing in weapons and military spending is never a bad choice, if it serves to tell the United States, Russia, China, and other world powers: we're here too, and if you try, we can defend ourselves. Anyone in Europe who talks about wasteful spending demonstrates shortsightedness and plays into the hands of potential enemies. So we ask ourselves: are those who hold these positions truly stupid, or are they simply being bribed by other powers? In either case, they should apologize to their citizens and no longer be voted for by people who think clearly. If every country in the world disarmed, there would be no military need anywhere, but if only a few do so, it would be political, military, and subsequently economic and financial suicide.

Continue Reading →

Giving an informative article the title: strange but true, it's certainly unusual, but if you continue reading we'll talk about ourselves, clearly and directly.

Let's not spend time justifying our decisions.

We like to answer every question in a detailed and direct manner, to clarify the rationale behind all our decisions. Our rules are all shared, voted on freely and democratically, and with exceptional security measures. We expect everyone who joins us to abide by them all, forever. This isn't meanness, but it's the only way to ensure our entire system functions flawlessly. Discussing everything openly allows us to clarify certain concepts, often repetitively, but always in detail.

Why don't we tell everyone everything, and have many things we keep to ourselves?

We often talk about complete protection of personal data and our activities, which are made public at the appropriate time, keeping some details private because they shouldn't matter to those who aren't involved. Allowing everyone to remain invisible and completely anonymous, both inside and outside our system, is a basic rule of ours. No one should care who does what, but the beneficial effects of what we do on everyone's lives.

In DirectDemocracyS, is the system more important than the people who make it up?

Our system is a creation of all those who participate in it, and is entirely collectively owned by all our official members. The results achieved for the good of all humanity are more important than the individuals, or various groups of individuals, who made these results possible. But don't worry, we know how to reward all the groups involved, and all the individuals who are members of these groups, all connected, all protagonists. We give them significant points, and we invest approximately 33% of all our money to reward our best official members. You won't find any dissatisfied people, because we like to respect and generously reward everyone's concrete achievements.

Official members have a lot of power, and by winning the elections, they will have even more, and could this be dangerous for freedom and democracy?

Literally anyone can meet the requirements to become our official member, and therefore own, along with all other official members, our entire system. Naturally, in the initial, more sensitive and vulnerable stages, we carefully select each individual who joins us to create a solid foundation and put the right people in the right places. In the later stages, more and more people will be able to join us and be the true protagonists. In the final registration stages, all the good people on earth will be able to join us and change and improve the world together with us. All power is shared with everyone, so we are not comparable to other systems, where a few are in charge and everyone else is powerless to obey orders. In DirectDemocracyS, everyone decides, everyone complies, and we do so continuously. There is no system more secure, professional, fair, meritocratic, just, loyal, sincere, honest, and with greater potential than ours. Anyone who uses logic and common sense will understand that we are the best choice, for the good of all.

Could bad people boycott DirectDemocracyS, slowing down and stopping this whole system?

Thanks to our rules, it's impossible for anyone, from within or without, to even attempt to sabotage us. No person or group can become too powerful and thus impose their own interests on the general interest, which for us is the entire world population. Our system was designed from the start to prevent anyone from being clever.

Maybe with just a few people inside, it's easier to enforce all the rules, but with so many people, will it be difficult to prevent every possible problem?

DirectDemocracyS is structured and designed to work and achieve excellent results with a small number of users, many, and even the entire world's population. Our rules and methodologies ensure we won't encounter any problems, even with a sudden increase in our users—the number of people joining us. There may be very brief interruptions to some services and websites until the space and power of all our web servers are increased, but this usually lasts a few hours or a couple of days, during which only the most important activities, managed on other web servers, would still be active without interruption. This is also one of the reasons we have four main websites, on various public, private, and secret web servers. Not to hide anything, but to protect our most sensitive areas, making it impossible for saboteurs and front men to infiltrate them.

And would security measures be weakened with so many users?

With more users, there are more people in special security groups, and potentially more people who can monitor and report every activity, from every group, and from every user, so that any necessary disciplinary action can be taken.

And the money needed to keep the system running?

With more people, come more annual dues, more private donations, more advertising contracts, and more financial and economic activities. Therefore, we do not have, and will never have, any liquidity problems, whether with a small or large number of users. DirectDemocracyS has financial management teams that follow our financial and economic strategies, which aim for maximum efficiency with minimal expense. We know how to spend wisely without unnecessary waste. Just one example: we don't have huge offices and a large staff; we prefer to use our own volunteers and have offices in the homes or apartments of each of our official representatives in each of our local groups. These cost-saving measures work regardless of the number of users we have.

And how will you carry out the many activities, if all your users increase exponentially?

More users means more people carrying out activities on a voluntary basis, so the various activities will not decrease, nor will the quality of each of them. In fact, as the number of users grows, the total number of minutes spent by everyone carrying out the various activities will increase. Many types of users (the most sought after by anyone who joins us) require their presence and carrying out various activities with us, at least 20 minutes a day (possibly multiple logins per day), or alternatively, at least 120 minutes a week (on one or more days, one or multiple logins per day). We repeat: more users, more people making our enormous mechanism work perfectly.

So many beautiful words, but you're still very few people, and very few groups. And above all, very few concrete activities.

The validity of a project shouldn't be judged by the number of people participating in the system at various stages. We don't know of any businesses that have started with so many people, right from the start. DirectDemocracyS grows continuously, based on our needs and desires. We often have to stop new registrations, activations, and even invitations, to accommodate and integrate all the new users, so we don't worry about growth, which might seem slow from the outside. Anyone who judges a project like ours based on the number of supporters is simply a "sheep following the herd," which is exactly the type of user we don't need in our initial stages. We don't need people who are superficial or too "important" to join us.

Why don't you publish the exact data for this "growth" which may not be as great as you describe?

We don't have exact, real-time data on how many people join us, because so many remain completely invisible; therefore, we can't release reliable data. Initially, when we had a few hundred people, we had a counter that increased based on new registrations. Unfortunately, with free registrations, too many unreliable people joined us, and we spent a lot of time blocking and deleting fake profiles, bots, and multiple profiles. Our counter went up and down, and some of our members told us we had to do something. We created much safer, more detailed rules to prevent any problems. We blocked new registrations for about nine months and "cleaned up" by deleting all fake and unverified profiles. It took a very long time, and we decided to eliminate the user counter, also because we had created various user types, which made it virtually impossible to get an exact number live. From time to time, many of us do count ourselves, and we publish some of this data, which is always partial and therefore not entirely reliable. We repeat, DirectDemocracyS doesn't want to be popular or famous, especially initially, because it's a new system, created from scratch. It has no pretensions of winning over the general public, but rather of bringing together competent , compatible, reliable, loyal, sincere, and incorruptible people. The concrete activities are the practice, and for an efficient, useful, and credible practice, a theory is needed, one that is as close to perfection as possible. We have many internal activities, very detailed and concrete, which will be made public and implemented, at the right time, according to our rules. Again, we ask everyone not to judge a book by its cover, but to learn about it from the inside, and many concrete activities will become known. A system similar to ours didn't exist before, and likely won't exist in the future. We didn't have an "instruction manual" to create such a system from scratch. We don't put the cart before the horse, but rather we do things with order, discipline, and an organization that pays close attention to every detail.

We hope we've clarified some details and answered some questions, often a bit repetitive, but helpful in understanding the complexity of our system.

Continue Reading →