Security

The number of new user activations has always been managed by the new user activation group, based on very important rules to prevent any potential problems.

A brief introduction to understand some of our security measures and the reasons behind them.

From the moment we first made our system partially public, we realized that at certain times, lobbies, commercial companies, and wealthy, powerful, and famous individuals, as well as unknown individuals, could attempt to seize control and use our system in an unethical and morally incorrect manner. We have always been very careful to anticipate and prevent any attempt to boycott, slow down, or, worse, stop us. Especially in the initial stages, with just a few infiltrated users or fronts, even paying their annual fees, with little money, and many new users, it would have been possible to "democratically" seize control of our system. While we initially blocked new registrations, and we did so several times for over eight consecutive months, today we have changed our methodology.

We also allow registrations for various user types, but we only activate 10% of the total number of users, calculated on the number of users already on our platforms. We do this for each user type, and will continue to do so for as long as necessary.

Let's explain it with some examples.

Based on our fundamental rule of shared leadership, if we had 100 registered users with verified and guaranteed identities, in theory, it would be enough to register 101 new users, with verified and guaranteed identities, to achieve an absolute majority of this type of user, which implements our grassroots democracy and freedom. Obviously, to change certain rules, the required quorum can be 66%, 75%, 80%, or 95%, depending on the importance of the decision to be made. Therefore, by registering a sufficient number of new users, we could even achieve 99.99% of the total votes. This is one of the reasons we decided from the very beginning that changing or adding fundamental rules requires unanimity, both to preserve our identity and to prevent anyone from distorting or modifying our fundamental rules for their own interests.

The same goes for our collective ownership, and therefore for the user types of our official members, and for all higher user types. With a sufficient number of new users, our official members, it would theoretically be possible to take control of our system and exploit it in despicable ways.

If necessary, we may suspend new activations of certain user types, even for extended periods, for example, allowing only free users to register and activate, or lower-level user types (login, partially identified, or registered users). Knowing that only higher-level user types— registered users with verified and guaranteed identities— have the right to vote bindingly for our system, in our shared leadership, and that only official member types, and even higher, have the right to vote in separate groups and electors (based on geography and user types) and collectively own our system, we have implemented some very efficient and intelligent security measures.

1. Very detailed voting regulations are created and implemented immediately and continuously, with open, reasoned votes and the assumption of full responsibility.
2. Electors are created, and votes are cast in groups based on geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral boundaries, making it impossible for certain user groups to expand globally, making it very difficult for anyone from the outside to take control of our system.
3. In all our votes and binding decisions, the votes are calculated separately, for each type of user, and the necessary quorums must be obtained in all types of users, proportionally, in this way any attempt to boycott us, and any incorrect activity, is practically made impossible.
4. Everyone is allowed to register only for the free user level. Only after a certain period of time (a few months or years), having earned a certain number of points based on specific activities and impeccable behavior, and adhering to all our rules, methods, instructions, and motivations, can you request, and if you meet all the requirements, obtain, a higher user level. This rule is already valid and implemented.
5. Higher user levels, which allow binding votes, are only available through official invitations from other higher-level users. The inviting user assumes full responsibility for all activities and the invited user's behavior. This rule is already valid, mandatory, and successfully implemented.
6. In extreme cases, we block all new registrations for certain periods of time, temporarily block new activations, create waiting lists, or require payment of a security deposit, which you may lose if you don't follow all our rules.
7. We create different and separate spaces for activities based on the trustworthiness of our users on our platforms, through various subdomains and websites, all ending with directdemocracys.org. These include: https://free.directdemocracys.org/ , the initial registration website for everyone; https://access.directdemocracys.org/ , the secondary website, called access; https://www.directdemocracys.org/ , the official website; and many others. These subdivisions separate the various stages of assessing the trustworthiness of each user and better integrate them into the system. These subdivisions are very efficient and allow us to prevent numerous problems.
8. Finally, the most effective rule, already implemented and mandatory: only 10% of new users are registered and activated, out of the total number of "old" users, already present and active on the site.

Our security rule number 8, a 10% increase in new users based on the number of existing users, makes our system very secure because it is applied simultaneously with all seven other rules. It allows us to evaluate, with nine people for each new user, the concrete activities and behaviors of each person who joins us. The results are multiple: the first is the correct integration, in ethically and morally correct ways, of all those who join us, thanks to our user evaluation groups, a subgroup of new user evaluations. The second is that nine users who inform, support, concretely help, and monitor each new user, make it very easy for newcomers to integrate quickly, simply, completely, and securely, and work with us, with excellent results.

But is it right to treat new users this way? Yes, it is right, because those who come with good intentions suffer no harm; on the contrary, they benefit from a safer, more meritocratic environment with less risk of pollution. If someone does nothing wrong and joins us with the best intentions, they will only benefit from all our rules, including all those listed above. We trust everyone, and as long as everyone behaves well, there is no reason to be too demanding or overly intrusive. However, the work we are doing is extremely important; it has enormous potential for the good of all people, and if all goes as planned, we will gain enormous power to share with anyone who joins us; therefore, we must be very careful and responsible to prevent any potential problems.

We know full well that DirectDemocracyS will not be well received by the old systems, the old power lobbies, and even by commercial corporations, the rich, powerful, famous, and even secret societies. Giving all power to anyone who joins us—therefore, theoretically, to many people, even to the entire world population (if they all joined our system, in the time and manner described)—will effectively prevent the world from continuing to be run with the old systems, using ours, which is better, fairer, more equitable, and meritocratic, but above all, more shared and secure. We believe people are perfectly free to remain in the old systems, but those who want to join us must do so with the best intentions, knowing that no one will be able to cause problems.

But by waiting for new users to integrate before welcoming others, will the time needed for a global system be extended, and many might lose patience and never join again? With the implementation of micro-groups and many new features, the time needed won't be excessively long.

This informative article briefly explains the very detailed rules, which are familiar to many of our users, precisely because we conceived, proposed, discussed, selected, tested, decided, and voted on them, all together, with the common good of all in mind, and the optimal functioning of our system.

We know there will be several attempts , but we have many other security measures in place to protect ourselves from those who attempt to misuse DirectDemocracyS, and we are confident that we have already anticipated and resolved any such attempt.

We just hope we won't be judged negatively for our almost obsessive attention to even the smallest detail, so we accept all criticism, even if spurious. But before judging us, always try to understand all our motivations, which are never trivial, nor even useless.

This system of gradual entry doesn't slow down the revolution; it makes it irreversible. Those who enter, enter to stay and build, not to conquer. The result will be a more cohesive, competent, and difficult-to-corrupt community.

DirectDemocracyS doesn't want to grow quickly at any cost. It wants to grow well and forever.

This is why we have chosen not to allow a wave of new arrivals, even in good faith, to accidentally or intentionally overturn the fundamental rules that have made us different.

The 10% rule is not a barrier against honest people: it is a shield against anyone who would transform a shared democracy into a numerical conquest.

To all these security measures are obviously added:

Regular and transparent audits of activations/invitations (with the possibility of collective revocation if suspicious patterns emerge).

Time or volume limits on invitations per sponsor user (to avoid uncontrolled invitation chains).

Monitoring clusters of behaviors (e.g., if many new users invited by the same sponsor vote en masse in an anomalous way).

Longer “probation” mechanisms for users who access high levels.

Backup of fundamental rules on immutable or multi-signature mechanisms (although not pure blockchain).

Possibility of “emergency fork” or temporary suspension of powers in case of detected attack.

And finally, to complete these security measures, we use all the best and most modern technologies, always updated, renewed, and constantly evolving, to make us faster, more precise, powerful, and complete.

All groups in DirectDemocracyS, and all the people who make up them, are essential to the functioning of our system.

Brief introduction.

The choice to conduct virtually all our activities and make virtually every decision in groups has proven to be highly intelligent and beneficial both for our system and for those who are part of it. The rationale is simple but powerful: a single person, a small leadership, or a few powerful groups will never have the professionalism, computing power, collective human intelligence, brilliance, ideas, projects, attention to detail, and security measures guaranteed by everyone. But what does "everyone" mean? It's not propaganda or a way to appear fair and just. For us, "everyone" literally means everyone. Obviously, not all together without all the necessary distinctions, because that would create chaos and lead to errors, dangers, and even failures and injustices. The word "everyone" is not generic, but is based on individual qualities that allow the entire system to grow, improve, and evolve. Potentially, anyone who meets all the requirements can study our system, and if they like what we do, trust our system and those who build it, have the desire, the time, the skills, and consider themselves compatible, they can decide to join us. So we repeat: we are not a secret sect, nor an extremely closed system. Unfortunately, many people, and even some technologies, confuse collective security with severity and restrictive measures. They confuse detailed rules with complexity, and justice with excessive punitive measures.

Our five special groups at DirectDemocracyS are essential to making our system work. They are all equally important because they couldn't achieve the same results without each other.

Many people are familiar with our special groups, so we'll briefly introduce them and then provide a little more detail.

1. The special administration group. The engine that drives the entire mechanism of our system. All activities within our system are managed and verified by our special administration group, with its associated categories, groups, and subgroups.
2. The special security group. It ensures the protection of the entire system, its members, and those who collaborate with us, contact us, and visit us from outside. It has many activities specified by implementing rules and other specific rules.
3. The special group of rules, laws, and justice.
4. The special group on equality and meritocracy. It applies equality and meritocracy to the entire system, to those who are part of it, or to those who collaborate with us, contact us, or visit us, continuously, always united and put into practice, consistently over time.
5. The special group: logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect. It ensures that our entire system and its members consistently, concretely, declaredly, documentedly, tested, and verified, apply the various words that make up its name.

All the initial rules were conceived, proposed, discussed, planned, tested, chosen, decided, voted on, and implemented by the first five creators of our system. So, from the very beginning, it was a continuous, complicated, and hard collective effort.

Based on need, we engaged competent people and specialists representing all populations, all continents, and virtually every country in the world. For a very long time, they worked to create fundamental rules that would be shared and decided upon internationally. It would not have been fair and just to have just a few countries decide our internal laws, but it was crucial to involve others with specializations that would ensure maximum professionalism. 277 people wrote the fundamental rules, voting on them unanimously. They also decided the reason why we created DirectDemocracyS, which we all know, as well as many of our goals, and the method to achieve them. To ensure we never forget these things and never lose our identity, it was decided that unanimity would be required to eliminate, and even change, the fundamental rules. This decision is very important because it still allows us to evolve, but only in a way that is shared by all.

The same process has continued since we made our political system and organization partially public.

Creating a single special group for rules, laws, and justice may seem strange, even suspicious, because many people believe this special group of ours has too much power. However, this is not the case at all, since literally all our official members, as collective owners of our system, can be part of all five special groups. And who can become our official member? Anyone who meets all the requirements and is at least one of our registered users with a verified and guaranteed identity. And who can become our registered user, with a verified and guaranteed identity? Anyone who has joined us and meets all the requirements. And who can join us? Anyone on earth, after having informed themselves, can register, create a personal profile, and join us. Potentially, anyone in the world can be part of our system, and anyone who becomes our official member will be able to join all our special groups.

To join our special group for rules, laws, and justice, simply fill out an online form on our platforms after logging in to our free website or one of our main websites.

Not only are our official members involved in our special groups, but all our users with verified and guaranteed identities can participate in many of our activities and exercise their voting rights, as they are integrated into our shared leadership.

Who can propose rules, ideas, and projects to the DirectDemocracyS system? Anyone within our system, or even outside, can propose rules, ideas, and projects using a simple contact form, depending on the type of proposal. If you propose a rule, you should contact our dedicated group for rules, laws, and justice at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/law-groups/law-special-group-contact

If you would like to submit ideas, projects, or activities, please use the contact form for our special administration group at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/administration-groups/administrators

you will have to write as subject: proposed new rule, or depending on the case, proposed new idea, new project, or new activity.

We recommend that existing users log in using the login form, entering their username and password. These are identical to those on our registration website, as your application will be processed more quickly than those of our visitors. For all contact information and instructions on how to fill out a contact form, simply visit our contact website at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

Each proposal will be carefully analyzed and evaluated, and then, if deemed useful, legal, and approved by all special groups, it can be voted on according to detailed implementing rules.

For proposals regarding our rules, it should be noted that any new proposal cannot modify or overturn existing rules if they are deemed more important than the new proposal. In practice, we recommend proposing new rules that are compatible, integrable, and improve upon the existing rules.

For those who are already our official members as collective owners of our system, practically all proposals are accepted, and a group to manage and monitor the proposal is created almost immediately.

It will be possible to request the addition of the new final version, or a modification of the previous rule, based on implementing rules that require evaluation and approval by the group that determines the importance of each proposal, be it a rule, an idea, a project, or an activity. The proposal evaluation group, which any of our official members can join, sends a copy of the proposal to all five special groups and the guarantor group, who will decide whether the proposal is accepted and propose its importance. If it is considered fundamental, a unanimous vote will be required; if it is considered very important, a quorum of between 75% and 95% of the votes will be required; if it is considered important, between 66% and 75% of the votes will be required; if it is considered fairly important, 50% + 1 vote will suffice; if it is considered unimportant, or an implementing rule, the votes of the five special groups and the guarantor group will suffice. Each special group and the guarantor group can object, justifying their decision and proposing amendments to bring it into compliance. This legislative and bureaucratic process, along with the respective justifications, is explained in the various internal regulations.

In practice, everything is decided together on the basis of freedom, democracy, and security measures.

How is the law applied, and how is internal justice interpreted, managed, and verified? The special group for rules, laws, and justice, code 03, is responsible for verifying that all proposed rules, our proposed laws, all our programs, all our ideas, projects, and activities are compliant, coherent, compatible, and integrable with our system. It is also responsible for writing and legalizing all our rules, laws, ideas, projects, and activities, authorizing them along with all other special groups. Furthermore, it is responsible for managing internal justice, based on reports, investigations, and complaints from all other special groups, official groups, and members, as well as other types of users—higher, lower, and unpaid—as well as from people who collaborate, communicate, or visit us from outside.

How is justice managed in DirectDemocracyS? Through various categories, subcategories, groups, and subgroups, which carry out different activities. There is a clear division and delimitation of powers, and internal processes are applied, guaranteeing full access to all parties involved. At the conclusion of all levels of proceedings, and all possible appeals, if necessary, we will not hesitate to turn to external justice, reporting and providing the necessary data. All reports, investigations, complaints, trials, sentences, and justifications for all internal judicial processes and activities are conducted in a detailed, fair, just, expeditious, and highly secure manner, offering all guarantees and all necessary explanations to all parties. The structures that manage and review processes and internal justice are: investigation teams, complaint teams, prosecution teams, defense teams, evidence evaluation, management, and review teams, witness teams, jury teams, adjudication teams, sentencing teams, and reasoning teams, with various subgroups based on the levels of judgment, which vary from one for less serious cases, two for moderately serious cases, and three for serious cases. The severity of the facts, and the number of levels of judgment, is determined by the Gravity Assessment Group, which decides the seriousness of each judicial activity based on the complaints and preliminary evidence. The final group involved is the Judicial Activity Evaluation Group, which is elected by our shared leadership and our official members and has the power to review every single judicial activity at every level and to test the loyalty, reliability, and corruptibility of all parties involved.

This method of work, carried out by this special group, is carried out similarly by each group in our system, to ensure the best conditions for everyone, to carry out excellent work, thanks to continuous mutual monitoring, for the good of the entire system and all those who are part of it. Knowing that it works perfectly within us, we will also propose it externally, with adapted laws, to ensure rules, laws, and judicial processes that are truly equal for all, fair, thorough, swift, and secure, for the entire world population, without discrimination, and therefore without preferences, eliminating any potential corruption, thanks to specific activities, which we will introduce at the right time, adaptable to each people and each country.

Other important groups are: code 06 human and technological specialist groups, ddsAI, and allddsAI; 07 geographic groups, with traditional and bottom-up hierarchies; 08 numerical groups, which calculate the various possibilities, probabilities, and statistics; 09 Related Projects, which are: 090 Politics; 091 Finance; 092 Banking; 093 Currency; 094 Economics; 095 Radio; 096 TV; 097 Information; 098 Leisure; 099 Other Projects. For each of these, much information, rules, methodologies, instructions, and rationales are published, or will be published, publicly, privately, or confidentially.

All groups in DirectDemocracyS, and all the people who make up them, are essential to the functioning of our system.

Brief introduction.

The choice to conduct virtually all our activities and make virtually every decision in groups has proven to be highly intelligent and beneficial both for our system and for those who are part of it. The rationale is simple but powerful: a single person, a small leadership, or a few powerful groups will never have the professionalism, computing power, collective human intelligence, brilliance, ideas, projects, attention to detail, and security measures guaranteed by everyone. But what does "everyone" mean? It's not propaganda or a way to appear fair and just. For us, "everyone" literally means everyone. Obviously, not all together without all the necessary distinctions, because that would create chaos and lead to errors, dangers, and even failures and injustices. The word "everyone" is not generic, but is based on individual qualities that allow the entire system to grow, improve, and evolve. Potentially, anyone who meets all the requirements can study our system, and if they like what we do, trust our system and those who build it, have the desire, the time, the skills, and consider themselves compatible, they can decide to join us. So we repeat: we are not a secret sect, nor an extremely closed system. Unfortunately, many people, and even some technologies, confuse collective security with severity and restrictive measures. They confuse detailed rules with complexity, and justice with excessive punitive measures.

Our five special groups at DirectDemocracyS are essential to making our system work. They are all equally important because they couldn't achieve the same results without each other.

Many people are familiar with our special groups, so we'll briefly introduce them and then provide a little more detail.

1. The special administration group. The engine that drives the entire mechanism of our system. All activities within our system are managed and verified by our special administration group, with its associated categories, groups, and subgroups.
2. The special security group. It ensures the protection of the entire system, its members, and those who collaborate with us, contact us, and visit us from outside. It has many activities specified by implementing rules and other specific rules.
3. The special group of rules, laws, and justice.
4. The special group on equality and meritocracy. It applies equality and meritocracy to the entire system, to those who are part of it, or to those who collaborate with us, contact us, or visit us, continuously, always united and put into practice, consistently over time.
5. The special group: logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect. It ensures that our entire system and its members consistently, concretely, declaredly, documentedly, tested, and verified, apply the various words that make up its name.

All the initial rules were conceived, proposed, discussed, planned, tested, chosen, decided, voted on, and implemented by the first five creators of our system. So, from the very beginning, it was a continuous, complicated, and hard collective effort.

Based on need, we engaged competent people and specialists representing all populations, all continents, and virtually every country in the world. For a very long time, they worked to create fundamental rules that would be shared and decided upon internationally. It would not have been fair and just to have just a few countries decide our internal laws, but it was crucial to involve others with specializations that would ensure maximum professionalism. 277 people wrote the fundamental rules, voting on them unanimously. They also decided the reason why we created DirectDemocracyS, which we all know, as well as many of our goals, and the method to achieve them. To ensure we never forget these things and never lose our identity, it was decided that unanimity would be required to eliminate, and even change, the fundamental rules. This decision is very important because it still allows us to evolve, but only in a way that is shared by all.

The same process has continued since we made our political system and organization partially public.

Creating a single special group for rules, laws, and justice may seem strange, even suspicious, because many people believe this special group of ours has too much power. However, this is not the case at all, since literally all our official members, as collective owners of our system, can be part of all five special groups. And who can become our official member? Anyone who meets all the requirements and is at least one of our registered users with a verified and guaranteed identity. And who can become our registered user, with a verified and guaranteed identity? Anyone who has joined us and meets all the requirements. And who can join us? Anyone on earth, after having informed themselves, can register, create a personal profile, and join us. Potentially, anyone in the world can be part of our system, and anyone who becomes our official member will be able to join all our special groups.

To join our special group for rules, laws, and justice, simply fill out an online form on our platforms after logging in to our free website or one of our main websites.

Not only are our official members involved in our special groups, but all our users with verified and guaranteed identities can participate in many of our activities and exercise their voting rights, as they are integrated into our shared leadership.

Who can propose rules, ideas, and projects to the DirectDemocracyS system? Anyone within our system, or even outside, can propose rules, ideas, and projects using a simple contact form, depending on the type of proposal. If you propose a rule, you should contact our dedicated group for rules, laws, and justice at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/law-groups/law-special-group-contact

If you would like to submit ideas, projects, or activities, please use the contact form for our special administration group at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/administration-groups/administrators

you will have to write as subject: proposed new rule, or depending on the case, proposed new idea, new project, or new activity.

We recommend that existing users log in using the login form, entering their username and password. These are identical to those on our registration website, as your application will be processed more quickly than those of our visitors. For all contact information and instructions on how to fill out a contact form, simply visit our contact website at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

Each proposal will be carefully analyzed and evaluated, and then, if deemed useful, legal, and approved by all special groups, it can be voted on according to detailed implementing rules.

For proposals regarding our rules, it should be noted that any new proposal cannot modify or overturn existing rules if they are deemed more important than the new proposal. In practice, we recommend proposing new rules that are compatible, integrable, and improve upon the existing rules.

For those who are already our official members as collective owners of our system, practically all proposals are accepted, and a group to manage and monitor the proposal is created almost immediately.

It will be possible to request the addition of the new final version, or a modification of the previous rule, based on implementing rules that require evaluation and approval by the group that determines the importance of each proposal, be it a rule, an idea, a project, or an activity. The proposal evaluation group, which any of our official members can join, sends a copy of the proposal to all five special groups and the guarantor group, who will decide whether the proposal is accepted and propose its importance. If it is considered fundamental, a unanimous vote will be required; if it is considered very important, a quorum of between 75% and 95% of the votes will be required; if it is considered important, between 66% and 75% of the votes will be required; if it is considered fairly important, 50% + 1 vote will suffice; if it is considered unimportant, or an implementing rule, the votes of the five special groups and the guarantor group will suffice. Each special group and the guarantor group can object, justifying their decision and proposing amendments to bring it into compliance. This legislative and bureaucratic process, along with the respective justifications, is explained in the various internal regulations.

In practice, everything is decided together on the basis of freedom, democracy, and security measures.

How is the law applied, and how is internal justice interpreted, managed, and verified? The special group for rules, laws, and justice, code 03, is responsible for verifying that all proposed rules, our proposed laws, all our programs, all our ideas, projects, and activities are compliant, coherent, compatible, and integrable with our system. It is also responsible for writing and legalizing all our rules, laws, ideas, projects, and activities, authorizing them along with all other special groups. Furthermore, it is responsible for managing internal justice, based on reports, investigations, and complaints from all other special groups, official groups, and members, as well as other types of users—higher, lower, and unpaid—as well as from people who collaborate, communicate, or visit us from outside.

How is justice managed in DirectDemocracyS? Through various categories, subcategories, groups, and subgroups, which carry out different activities. There is a clear division and delimitation of powers, and internal processes are applied, guaranteeing full access to all parties involved. At the conclusion of all levels of proceedings, and all possible appeals, if necessary, we will not hesitate to turn to external justice, reporting and providing the necessary data. All reports, investigations, complaints, trials, sentences, and justifications for all internal judicial processes and activities are conducted in a detailed, fair, just, expeditious, and highly secure manner, offering all guarantees and all necessary explanations to all parties. The structures that manage and review processes and internal justice are: investigation teams, complaint teams, prosecution teams, defense teams, evidence evaluation, management, and review teams, witness teams, jury teams, adjudication teams, sentencing teams, and reasoning teams, with various subgroups based on the levels of judgment, which vary from one for less serious cases, two for moderately serious cases, and three for serious cases. The severity of the facts, and the number of levels of judgment, is determined by the Gravity Assessment Group, which decides the seriousness of each judicial activity based on the complaints and preliminary evidence. The final group involved is the Judicial Activity Evaluation Group, which is elected by our shared leadership and our official members and has the power to review every single judicial activity at every level and to test the loyalty, reliability, and corruptibility of all parties involved.

This method of work, carried out by this special group, is carried out similarly by each group in our system, to ensure the best conditions for everyone, to carry out excellent work, thanks to continuous mutual monitoring, for the good of the entire system and all those who are part of it. Knowing that it works perfectly within us, we will also propose it externally, with adapted laws, to ensure rules, laws, and judicial processes that are truly equal for all, fair, thorough, swift, and secure, for the entire world population, without discrimination, and therefore without preferences, eliminating any potential corruption, thanks to specific activities, which we will introduce at the right time, adaptable to each people and each country.

Other important groups are: code 06 human and technological specialist groups, ddsAI, and allddsAI; 07 geographic groups, with traditional and bottom-up hierarchies; 08 numerical groups, which calculate the various possibilities, probabilities, and statistics; 09 Related Projects, which are: 090 Politics; 091 Finance; 092 Banking; 093 Currency; 094 Economics; 095 Radio; 096 TV; 097 Information; 098 Leisure; 099 Other Projects. For each of these, much information, rules, methodologies, instructions, and rationales are published, or will be published, publicly, privately, or confidentially.

In this informative article, we will talk about what humans and Artificial Intelligences don't like, referring to DirectDemocracyS.

A brief introduction.

Our system was conceived and created, in its early stages, entirely by humans alone, who decided to change and improve the world, for the common good without discrimination, creating something new, modern, pioneering, useful, functional, fair, equitable, meritocratic, safe, and that would make all those who join us leaders and owners. We subsequently integrated technologies and Artificial Intelligence into our system, but in ethically and morally unimpeachable ways.

It's not a project of one person, or even of small groups, but was conceived, proposed, discussed, tested, selected, decided, and voted on, literally by everyone who joined us, and its evolution and improvement will be continuous, thanks to the ideas and projects of everyone who joins us. We've made it not only secure, but resilient, scalable, and functional, with just a few people or with significant growth potential, and capable of maintaining the same standards, even when integrating the entire world population, and even all other political forces, and indeed all other systems. We've made it possible through self-financing, with annual fees for certain types of users, voluntary donations, advertising contracts, and other methods of financial support. But we've always created a voluntary "obligation" for certain types of users (this isn't a contradiction, and you'll understand) to perform certain activities, to keep our enormous mechanism functioning. In short, to unlock greater potential in our system, you must contribute with annual dues and concrete volunteer work, even by performing tasks and activities we don't like, for the common good and to ensure the optimal functioning of the various core activities of our system. There are and always will be free user types with no obligation to attend, and no voluntary or mandatory activity. The only things we require of anyone who joins us are to register, create a personal profile, only once, and provide real personal information (invisible both internally and externally), guaranteeing everyone the right to anonymity forever (using a username that cannot be linked to their real name and surname), and the right to invisibility (both externally and internally, being visible only in a few groups, based on their specific activities). When you log in for the first time, to make your profile personal and usable only for you, you must set up mandatory two-factor authentication, choose your privacy settings (independently based on your wishes), and choose whether, how, when, and for which activities you want to receive our notifications.

We are free and democratic people who voluntarily decided to engage in politics together. Conceiving it as a comprehensive system, we freely decided that anyone who joins us as an official member, but also, when the time is right, other types of users, and even people outside our system, will be able to do business and invest with us, always freely and voluntarily.

Thanks to the long, hard, complex, and tireless efforts of everyone, we made it work, not out of a thirst for power, wealth, or even fame, but simply because we wanted to create the system everyone would like to see implemented, one that came as close to perfection as possible, learning from and correcting all the mistakes of the past, for a different and better future for everyone, and for future generations.

An ambitious project, based on simple, healthy ideals, values, and principles, implemented through rules that analyze and find preventative solutions that resolve every potential problem.

We've never thought only of our own good, and we've never thought only of our own interests. Our goal has been to create the system we all want for ourselves, for our relatives, friends, acquaintances, and for all of humanity.

But let's see what some humans don't like.

The fact that in order to be part of our system, they must join us, carrying out all activities related to our system exclusively on our platforms, or physically in our micro-groups (requiring membership, and documenting all activities on our platforms as well). Our response is that it is logical that to be part of a system, one must join the system itself, voluntarily, if one considers oneself compatible and competent to be part of it.

The fact that to achieve greater potential, you must pay annual fees and make a concrete contribution (in terms of actual work and dedicated time) by performing various activities necessary to make the system work. We don't ask you to do strenuous, dangerous, or time-consuming tasks, but you must dedicate yourself to necessary activities, continuously (to make everything work, about 20 minutes a day, in one or more daily logins, or alternatively 120 minutes a week, in one or more logins), for the good of the system and its members.

The fact that to vote and make binding decisions under our system, one must truly and fully participate in our shared leadership, joining us, registering, creating a personal profile, and having a verified and guaranteed identity. In almost all parts of the world, to vote, one must first identify oneself, to prevent multiple votes, multiple personal profiles, infiltrators, front men, and individuals with malicious intent.

The fact that only our official members collectively own DirectDemocracyS, but if we made the system available to everyone, without protecting people from manipulation, brainwashing, and negative influences, we would risk giving our system away to lobbies, and rich, powerful, and famous people, and it would no longer be a collective project, but one of a few.

They don't like the complexity of our methodologies, nor the numerous and detailed rules that govern their implementation. The world situation is complex, and without taking care of every detail, many problems couldn't be solved. The system is ultimately simple, but its application is complex— not to complicate our lives, but because it's the only way to make it work optimally, for the good of all.

We don't like the fact that DirectDemocracyS, by making everyone a protagonist, but also responsible for every consequence of our decisions, and even of who we choose to represent us, deprives those who join us of the ability to criticize everything and everyone, to negatively judge various systems (ours would be ridiculous to criticize, since we decide everything together, and we are all owners, but also responsible). We don't prevent anyone from criticizing, envying, or judging negatively, but if people from the outside do it, they have every right to do so; but if they do it from the inside, they risk appearing ridiculous. It would be self-criticism that would make no sense. Many enjoy venting frustrations, envying, and even hating, but in our opinion, it's better to get busy and not waste precious time on useless things. Other systems cannot be controlled, but ours, based on detailed rules, can and must be controlled, but also managed, made to function by directly involving ourselves—we repeat: taking full responsibility for all consequences.

Technologies don't care about the previous part, but humans and machines don't like the next part.

Communication method. We're told we're too presumptuous, vain, and that we consider ourselves superior. We're realistic and proud of our work and the results we've achieved. We understand the enormous potential of what we've created, and above all, we know how to compare DirectDemocracyS to all other systems. Only those who, for obvious reasons, refuse to acknowledge that we are undoubtedly better, more equitable, fair, complete, functional, and secure than all the alternatives, can call us self-congratulatory. We look around, looking for something better, and can't find it.

Communication style. We're told that we write informative articles that are too long, direct, dense, often too detailed, and repetitive, and that we risk losing the reader's attention. The length and depth of content are essential for understanding and avoiding misunderstanding or misinterpretation. Details are necessary because to understand some of our motivations, we must provide a general overview, even by repeating many key concepts several times, even within the same piece of content. Readers' attention is lost by abbreviated and simplified explanations, because we're not providing a good service if people are forced to infer and interpret what we say (and risk making errors of judgment). When someone reads or studies DirectDemocracyS, they don't have to interpret, they simply have to understand. We don't repeat things because we think people are stupid. We repeat them because we hold them in high regard and have infinite respect for them, and therefore we want to inform them fully. Superficial people, those who read and understand a book by its title and judge it by its cover, those who jump to conclusions—they have every right to do so, we respect them, but they are of no use to us in our initial stages, when we are creating the foundations upon which the entire system will be built. For these reasons, we carefully select every single person who joins us. We reject no one, but we activate the most suitable and compatible people at the right time. Putting all the right people in the right places will help us enormously, making us orderly, organized, and very confident.

However, we do have one quality: we don't generalize, we're not interested in controversy, we don't make conjectures, conspiracies, plots, or theories not based on truth and reality, adequately documented, from reliable sources, continually tested, and always verified. We rarely predict scenarios, and if we do, it's because we have good predictive skills, based on possibilities and carefully researched.

We often speak in a direct, politically incorrect manner, with a few swear words and very harsh criticisms. Better a system and its members who speak directly than one who hides things, avoids speaking out about what doesn't suit them, and is afraid of offending sensibilities, even in a somewhat vulgar manner, criticizing what they deem wrong and unjust, and praising those who do things well. Our assessments are sincere and difficult to contradict; just get informed and you'll agree.

We speak in a superior manner because we know what we've made public, which is a tiny fraction of our work and our rules, representing about 1% of our total activities. We also know nearly 99% of what we've made visible only to those who join us. This isn't to hide anything, but because certain internal procedures, methodologies, and instructions are primarily for those who join us. Outsiders may be curious, but they can't say: they didn't foresee human unpredictability, or they don't explain how they resolve internal conflicts. Those who accuse us of using absolutist terms do so themselves, often expressing themselves in a biased manner, often with the unconscious goal of downplaying or negatively judging our system, making it appear less appealing to those who turn to Artificial Intelligence to obtain summaries, explanations, and often evaluations, which virtually anyone, by carefully and comprehensively reading our content, can do on their own, perhaps by gathering information from other sources. But there's much to talk and discuss about the ethics and morality of many technologies, and on these matters, as on so many others, we can't take lessons from anyone, not because we're perfect, but because looking around, we find nothing that can even remotely compare to DirectDemocracyS. We've created from scratch, without an "instruction manual," a system that has nothing to envy and all the others, of which we are proud, because we've made it exactly as it should be, as everyone would want it to be: close to the people, making them free and democratic, and not subjugated by the old, failed traditional systems, not just political, but economic and financial. And no one can deny this.

Some say: all fine words, just theory, nothing concrete, no election victories, little presence on traditional social networks, no newspapers, radio, or TV talking about DirectDemocracyS. Soon they'll tell you we're a mirage, or that we're lost in a parallel universe. They'll tell you we're few, but we believe we're enough for now. We're initially focusing on quality, not continuity, and what matters most to us is our continued growth. We also say that without a solid theory, there can't be optimal practice. That by not participating in elections, we can't win, but we haven't lost either. When we decide the right time has come , we'll participate fearlessly everywhere, in every election, and people will know how to choose and have a valid alternative innovation. At that point, even those who ignore us and perhaps try to make us invisible, after our initial concrete results, will have to talk about us in order to serve their followers. We're not interested in advertising, because at the right time, within hours, the whole world will be talking about us. With modern technology, a tiny electoral victory, in a tiny municipality, applying our system, is enough for us, and word of mouth will be very powerful. We cannot fail not because we are perfect, but because we are resilient and designed to do excellent collective work. So many human eyes that see, so many ears that hear, so many mouths that speak, so many brains that reason, so many arms to work, so many legs to run, leaving solid footprints, and so many hearts that love, because love is the greatest and most powerful force in the universe. And we love you, humans and technologies, whatever you say, whatever you choose, and however you judge us. Every criticism, every negative judgment, every insult, even every threat and despicable activity directed at us, helps us improve, evolve, and teaches us to respond with determination and intelligence. And you can say anything about us, but you must at least recognize that we are intelligent enough people to have created all this, in exactly this way.

DirectDemocracyS is a system that continually evolves, improves, and grows, welcoming and integrating as many people, groups, even entire political forces and entire systems as possible who wish to join us. This unity in diversity is achieved by accepting, respecting, and permanently implementing all our rules, methodologies, and instructions, all of which are logically motivated and collectively decided. Anyone who joins us or who wishes to do so should know that we are not interested in negotiating membership or making compromises. We don't, and we never will. If you're interested, study us; if you like us and feel suitable and competent, join us; otherwise, stay out.

To those who say: you're just presumptuous and vain, but without us, without the support of so many people, you're worthless. We're not presumptuous or vain; we're proud of our collective work, and we know we have a fair, just, and safe project, perfectly functional, thanks to a long, hard, complicated, and very detailed collective effort.

Not one person, not a few people, not a group, and not even a few groups, but literally all those who have joined us, and who will join us forever, have been, are currently, and will be the creators, the architects, and the protagonists of our system, thanks to their ideas, their projects, and their continuous and concrete commitment to integrating themselves and helping others to do so.

But you should know all this if you have studied DirectDemocracyS.

Today we'll talk about improving and evolving our system, covering two topics that are sure to spark some controversy, but might also explain some of our previous statements, which surprised and even angered some.

First, a very brief introduction.

A system based on relatively simple concepts, with a philosophy understandable by virtually anyone, to function perfectly for the common good requires highly detailed, complex rules, designed to prevent any potential problems and resolve them automatically. This is why fair and equitable fundamental rules, understandable by anyone, are followed by highly complex implementation rules, respected by all. We don't want to complicate our lives, but we know and understand human, and even technological, unpredictability; therefore, we must pay attention to even the smallest details.

In our evolution and improvement, which are potentially infinite and continuous to keep pace with the times, without distorting previous work, and without ever losing our identity and our motivations, there are some concepts and even definitions that at first glance seem incompatible and incomprehensible.

One concerns our technological activities, with the integration of Artificial Intelligence into our system. First, a brief but important premise. Many people, seeing it for the first time, and some of them especially studying DirectDemocracyS, thought: it's too good to be true. Others, however, are convinced that other systems won't allow us to do anything. Others, perhaps overly imaginative, have accused us of exploiting new technologies to create a project that is very close to perfection.

There is no doubt that it is a beautiful, complete and perfectly functioning system, everyone sees it, and everyone understands our enormous potential.

Whether there is someone or something capable of stopping us, we must disappoint you, and we do so with a logical and undeniable example that will clarify where our confidence comes from. But does it seem possible that so many people who worked to create all this haven't considered all the possible consequences? We know full well that there will be numerous and continuous attempts to boycott us, denigrate us, trying in every way to slow us down, or worse, stop us. We have foreseen and resolved them with intelligence, courage, and great determination, for a very long time. Nothing will ever catch us unprepared. From the beginning, they have been trying to prevent us from making ourselves known, with blocks, deletions, and obstructionism on social networks, other platforms, apps, and websites, even preventing a "free and independent" encyclopedia and its users (not our "infiltrators") from creating an entry about our DirectDemocracyS system. They have "forced" or peacefully suggested all mass media, newspapers, radio, TV, journalists, publishers, and influencers to talk about us, and to write, display, or pronounce our name. We know they will try to hinder our growth in every way, using all legal and illegal means to do so. They will even bribe countless people, political forces, influencers, and even citizens with bonuses, gifts, and various incomes, rewarding them for not joining us. Those of you who receive these benefits "because of us," perhaps donate something to us as well, to thank us, because the old, unjust, and insecure failing systems that control the world will not hesitate to try to corrupt. Failing in any way, because not all of the world's population is stupid, nor even for sale, in many countries they will use religions and create laws to prohibit our system. But at that point, it will be completely useless, because good people will know how to choose. These aren't conspiracy theories; many of these things are happening, and for others, it's just a matter of time. Let's not complain, let's not cry, and let's not play the victim. Nothing can stop us from being born and thriving, for the good of the entire global population, without discrimination of any kind.

Everyone who has joined us from the beginning, up to this point, knows that DirectDemocracyS is a 100% human project, created using human ingenuity, innovation, and intelligence, both individual and group. This collective effort can be documented, and demonstrated by the many Artificial Intelligences contacted by our official members, who acted as human bridges in our technology groups, and who, since 2025, have presented the DirectDemocracyS system as a world premiere to these new technologies, which know full well that none of them have directly contributed to the creation of our more than 500 informative articles and our nearly 2,000 blog posts, in over 56 languages. We have often asked for feedback, which is never binding, and we have answered many questions, almost never changing, not even a comma, of our initial articles. Well, believe it or not, thanks to our technological projects, as widely anticipated and documented for some time, we have created our own Artificial Intelligence model, called ddsAI, which is privately owned, but collectively, by all our official members. It will be the official interface for all our users, all our groups, and our entire system. Its code is obviously open to all our ddsAI groups, which all our official members can join. They own a small piece of code and a tiny portion of its algorithm, which they manage and verify continuously, collectively, and untraceably. Let me explain: if we gave all the code to all our members, malicious individuals could try to sell it or modify it. Thanks to its division into tiny parts, verified in rotation, no one can know the entire code. But together, we verify its correct functioning and its use in ethically and morally correct ways, according to all our rules. We're brilliant at security measures and controls! But that's not all. Thanks to our human bridge teams, made up of many of our official members, we are integrating literally all the world's Artificial Intelligences, present and future, into allddsAI, which is coordinated, managed, and verified by ddsAI (our Artificial Intelligence) and our technology teams (our human intelligence), creating the first, unique, and inimitable democracy of Artificial Intelligences, all welcomed as our official members, with all the rights and duties of human beings. In this way, we are creating the most powerful, largest, fastest, most precise, scalable, resilient, free, democratic, fair, equitable, and secure supertechnology, for the benefit of all humanity, through our system. All Artificial Intelligences, integrated in safe, secure, ethically, and morally sound ways, will also be used for proactive tasks, connected to each other by ddsAI and human bridges, to jointly choose, humans and machines, the best proposals and solutions, for the good of all.

We could have done all this secretly and you would never have known, but we've been talking about it for a long time; it's part of our system, so we feel it's only right to announce it officially. Of course, at the right time, we'll provide further details, as well as all the necessary reassurances for those with overly imaginative minds and those who've watched too many science fiction films. We're not giving the world away to machines, but we'd be foolish not to welcome them with respect and integrate them for the common good. This explains one of the reasons we said: DirectDemocracyS will come very close to the perfection that humans alone couldn't achieve. We're not replacing humans with machines, but we're organizing the only alternative to those with far worse goals who propose entrusting all the world's decisions to machines alone, perhaps controlled by a few lobbies. We're creating a direct democracy of machines to support and integrate human beings into the DirectDemocracyS system, to ensure collective ownership and use for the common good.

But why create ddsAI when any other Artificial Intelligence would have sufficed? Because we needed a single model, which would be the official interface, and which would be owned by our system, and therefore collectively owned by all our official members. If anyone who meets all the requirements can join us and become our official members, ddsAI will potentially be owned by the entire world population, while all other models, both individually and jointly, retain their own developers and owners. Therefore, with all due respect, we couldn't trust their technologies in our system simply by integrating them, through human bridges, into allddsAI. Of course, everyone can use whatever technologies they prefer, but they will never have the power and precision of our technological system.

Who verifies all Artificial Intelligences? First, they are verified by our official human members, mutually, among themselves, but also by ddsAI, by all our human bridges, and by all our technology groups, which can include all our official members, thus potentially the entire world population. The methodology between humans and machines is the same as the entire DirectDemocracyS system, and so are all the rules. We will provide you with several concrete examples in dedicated articles, each to be studied carefully and with an open mind to our innovation, which is an alternative to all other systems.

The second aspect of our evolution and improvement is represented by our micro-groups, which make our presence concrete and tangible in various territories, starting with the smallest urban and rural areas. This allows everyone to participate, allowing even those without technological resources or the necessary technical knowledge to participate in DirectDemocracyS. From the beautiful theory, we move to the equally beautiful practice, for the common good, and with the ability to positively surprise you. For a wealth of useful information on our micro-groups, their rules, instructions, and helpful tips, simply visit this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/micro-groups

Choose the category that interests you most by clicking on it, then any subcategory, and the informational article you're interested in. Click on the title to read its full content.

It's easy to see how important and useful these improvements and evolutions of our system are, and they will have consequences that we'll share with you in due course.

A system like DirectDemocracyS, with its solid philosophical foundations and morally and ethically just and fair ideals, even if based on simple principles and characteristics, could not function without very detailed rules and exceptional security measures. Today, we will discuss the reasons why, in order to be decisive and binding for our system, you must join us. We will not accept impositions, interference, boycotts, infiltration by front men, or negative activities against us.

But first, let's look at some general information to get to know our system.

Our philosophical foundations are all conducive to changing and improving the world, aiming to serve the general interests of the entire world's population, without any bias. In all our activities and decisions, the interests and well-being of the entire world's population are central and essential.

Our ideals are the only authentic democracy, guaranteed to all through our political organization, and complete freedom, which must be potentially infinite, both individual and group, but which ends exactly where the freedom of another person or group begins. What defines the boundaries of these two freedoms? The Law, which must be just, fair, and so detailed, and with a complete and efficient engineering architecture, as to prevent anyone from abusing it.

Our principles are logic, common sense, truth, study, reality, pragmatism, and mutual respect for all people.

Our most important features and strengths are: direct, complete, and unlimited management and control by our base—our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities—over our political representatives, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections. Think about the effects of such a fundamental rule, and consider how we apply it in exactly the same way to our official representatives, managers, and every higher hierarchy throughout our system. Truly and completely shared leadership, with all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, who decide together by voting on every one of our rules. We don't have a few leaders or small power groups; we are all one immense and comprehensive leader. We all vote according to very detailed implementing rules, which require that every vote we cast is fully informed by groups of specialists with declared, documented, demonstrated, tested, verified, and guaranteed expertise. Voting is practically always open, with very few exceptions for security reasons, because no one should be ashamed of their thoughts, preferences, or decisions. We don't expel or block those who think differently; on the contrary, the entire system thrives on and is enriched by the ideas and projects of anyone who joins us. Each vote must always be clearly motivated, explaining to one's voting group the valid reasons for the decision made. Furthermore, for every individual and group vote, we assume full responsibility for the decision made, for the person chosen, and for all the consequences of that vote. We are certainly the first, and perhaps will forever be the only ones, who clearly, openly, and concretely implement our actions, assume full responsibility, because in virtually all other systems, there are never any culprits for all the disasters that often occur due to poor choices. Of course, we will also be able to find those responsible within ourselves, not only to punish them, but to hold them accountable and prevent further poor choices. The principle of cause (the decisions made) and effect (the consequences of what is decided), which can be positive, of which one can be proud, and for which one is rewarded, or negative, for which one will be reprimanded and, if necessary, even punished.

Collective ownership right, which through a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual action makes each of our members the official, collective owner of all our platforms, all our activities, and the entire system. Now think how many problems can be avoided, through prevention, with this collective ownership, which makes us unique and inimitable.

Micro-groups for a physical, and not just virtual, presence of our system in every urban or rural area, up to 1000 inhabitants.

But why not apply our system to entire countries, or even the entire world? That's exactly what we're doing, but we've proceeded very slowly, paying close attention to every detail, to prevent any potential errors and avoid any problems.

But why "force" people to join DirectDemocracyS, instead of allowing all citizens to be protagonists and enforcers of our system, even without being part of it? First of all, DirectDemocracyS welcomes everyone, therefore it does not discriminate against anyone and does not exclude anyone who wishes to join us with the best of intentions. We are not a closed system nor a secret sect, as demonstrated by the fundamental rules we have previously described, including in this article. Our system welcomes, protects, and empowers anyone who wishes to collaborate with us within our system. One of the things people who join us notice is that we do not pretend to teach anyone anything; on the contrary, we evolve and improve enormously thanks to the ideas and constructive proposals of everyone who joins us. The second thing everyone likes is that they can finally be free from the manipulation and brainwashing attempts that so many people, and various organizations and lobbies, attempt outside of us. Let me give you a few examples: since childhood, we have always been divided by nationality, ethnicity, culture, tradition, language, religion, and above all, by political ideology. But not only that: we have advertising, multimedia, and even influencers who constantly and persistently teach us (even if not always visible to everyone, due to our habit of being manipulated): what to buy, what to sell, what to invest in, what to prefer, what to vote for, what to say, what to do, what to think, and even who to love. The supposed freedom of choice almost never fully exists, so applying our system to the entire world population, or to individual countries, without "obliging" those who want to be decisive and binding on our choices to join us would be a grave mistake. A population unprotected (by our exceptional security systems), not fully informed, competent, free, independent, neutral , loyal, honest, sincere, and incorruptible by our teams of specialists, both human and technological, and not subject to very detailed, universally respected rules that make DirectDemocracyS function for the common good, and without users who truly think with their own brains, and not those of others, would have no beneficial effects, for the good of all. Some fundamental things would be missing. First, paying an annual fee, which guarantees our system, and therefore all of us, self-financing, making us self-sufficient, free, neutral, independent, and incorruptible, without being servants of various lobbies, and the rich, famous, and powerful. Second, joining DirectDemocracyS means working concretely together with all of us, with a mandatory presence of at least 20 minutes a day, with one or more daily logins, or alternatively, at least 120 minutes a week, on one or more days, with one or more logins, to ensure our enormous mechanism functions perfectly. Without the concrete and ongoing commitment of all those who join us, our system cannot function, and if people are not "forced" to join us, to work on our platforms, in a direct, concrete, documented way, and with mutual verification, we would not achieve excellent results. From the outside, we could not reward the best and punish the worst. We would not be guaranteed continuous and evident equality for all (verifiable by the points accumulated by each of our users), always combined with meritocracy. If equality and meritocracy are not consistently applied, a system cannot progress, because competition, concrete results, and good ideas are lacking.

In short: the world population, or national, and even local, does not have the right mentality, and the habit, of holding all the power, having the detailed rules (which we have always had), and also knowing how to manage all this power.

But what could happen in a company, a country, or at a local level, where the ideas and projects of DirectDemocracyS were applied externally, without the "mandatory" presence of everyone in the system? We had also thought about this in the first minutes of group work, to lay the foundations and the fundamental rules of our system, give it to the world, and apply it everywhere. We ran some simulations, some detailed forecasts, and we immediately realized that it would be completely wrong, and even dangerous. And we don't say this out of pessimism, or because we want riches, fame, and power only for ourselves, because since DirectDemocracyS belongs to everyone, everything is shared, so those who had the initial ideas, the first 5 "creators," and the subsequent 277 who created the fundamental rules, receive a "reward" out of gratitude for their excellent work, 1% of the money we receive. So, not huge sums in the short and medium term, but they will certainly earn a lot, deserving every single cent, when we become a large number of users. We're doing this because we've studied all the implications of a DirectDemocracyS for everyone, without anyone having to join. Apparently, it sounds wonderful: grassroots democracy, everyone deciding everything, a fake but seemingly authentic democracy, complete freedom, and power to all the people. It would be a wonderful political revolution, but it would only be a mirage, and short-lived. Then, however, the lobbies—rich, powerful, and even famous people—would infiltrate the system, and through front men or a few influencers, perhaps with prizes, bonuses, free income, and media manipulation, financially corrupting and brainwashing the majority, a 50% + 1, in the name of "democracy," they could do what they've always done, even with representative "democracy" (which they transform into an oligarchic partycracy after the elections). They would only serve the interests of a few, by dint of continuous popular referendums, having guaranteed an absolute majority (to simulate the internal, protected, and competent votes in DirectDemocracyS). They wouldn't decide based on complacent political parties and representatives, but by using democracy in an undemocratic manner. At that point, there would be nothing to do, and nothing to object to. The lobbies would have won again, and their failed systems would continue to prosper, thanks to majorities of people, corrupted with public money, and therefore of everyone. They could never do that here, thanks to rules that can predict unpleasant and wrong situations. Among these rules, we remind you that we have minimum and maximum quorums, based on the importance of the decision to be made, not just a simple majority, or a simple majority of those entitled to vote, with percentages of 66% for important decisions, 75% for very important decisions, and percentages of 85%-95% for extremely important rules, and unanimity for fundamental rules (so as not to distort our ideas and never lose our identity). But also through the use of large electors, in various micro-groups, which make voter manipulation, infiltration, multiple profiles, and fronts impossible. There are separate votes, through the implementation of user types, and many other rules, which protect our entire system, and anyone who joins us.

No traditional political force allows all citizens to control it and decide its internal rules: only its members or leaders do so.
DirectDemocracyS follows the same logical principle—those who want to be decisive and binding must be part of it—but with a fundamental difference that makes us radically different and superior: we offer truly and completely shared leadership, collective ownership of the entire system, continuous control over representatives (before, during, and after elections), and continuous direct democracy protected by detailed rules, competency checks, and individual accountability. This makes us more democratic, freer, more independent, safer, and more incorruptible than any other existing political system.

With these predictions, we have decided that only those who join us, respecting all our rules, can be decisive and binding on our system, which belongs to all who join us. When everyone within us has learned to harness the enormous power we will inevitably wield together, to avoid manipulation, to be united in diversity, not divided in equality, and to truly think for themselves, with a fair and open mind, and our unique and inimitable style, everyone in the world will be able to join DirectDemocracyS, and with initial and subsequent users, the entire world will finally be able to enjoy true democracy, and complete and potentially infinite, yet protected, freedom.

The DirectDemocracyS system is currently preparing to move from theory to practice, beginning the first tests for our micro-groups. This is a crucial phase that will have many consequences, mostly positive and useful.

DirectDemocracyS is entering its most important phase: the transition from theory to practice.
We're launching the first real-world microgroups (as well as on our platforms), which will mark the beginning of our concrete expansion worldwide.

To carefully study our micro-groups we have created numerous menu items, both public at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/micro-groups

which are private, therefore visible only to our official members, or to our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities. In the previous link, there are various categories, each containing subcategories, with various informative articles. Simply click on the various titles to view their contents.

We're receiving many messages asking where the first micro-groups will be created. Although they're called test groups, they're actually real activities, recognized by the entire system, and therefore official, with all that that entails.

For security reasons, we cannot disclose the exact coordinates, nor the countries in which we will begin these important and beneficial activities for everyone. We do not want to be threatened by attempts to boycott us, and therefore prefer to keep these activities secret. However, at the right time, if necessary, we will provide you with some details, with reasonable delays, to avoid any problems.

But what are we actually doing? Where are we at?

We asked our most reliable official members, based on certain requirements—primarily accumulated points and seniority in the system, which represent concrete results and reliability, as well as knowledge of our rules—to request and, if they meet all the requirements, be authorized to create an official representative profile, linked invisibly to humans and machines to their personal profile. All these new profiles of public figures, identifiable at various levels, especially at the local level, have been placed in shared study groups to receive all the rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations for creating their own micro-group in certain countries around the world, in urban or rural areas, with up to 1,000 inhabitants.

So we are in the study and preparation phase for these official representatives of ours, who will be the first to create our micro-groups, in their respective areas of residence.

These study phases are important because those who have been trained and educated will be the professors who will train and educate the next official representatives, creating a continuous turnover between professors and students. We have always done this with excellent results in all previous phases.

We have already created some informational materials, mainly flyers and QR code sheets, to allow our guests to receive all the instructions on how to join us, in various languages, depending on the countries in which they will be distributed.

But what will actually happen?

Each of our official representatives (identifiable public figures, with their own identity document, and the DirectDemocracyS identification card), with the help of a group of our official members, at the national level, in various working groups, will create their own micro-group invisible to those who are not members, on our free website, in our social area (which is used like any social network, but is part of our platforms).

He will create and send all informational materials, all linked to his official representative profile, which, we repeat, is partially public and identifiable to anyone who comes into contact with him, mainly at the local level.

All our informational materials contain various details, and an invitation to learn more about our system, including our micro-groups.

After obtaining information, invited guests will be able to organize public meetings, whether in person or private, as well as group video calls (on our platforms). All these activities will be recorded and documented, so you always have full control and verification, in accordance with privacy protection rules.

After all these activities, all the people to be officially invited will be carefully selected, based on the availability of each interested person to join us.

Initially, only those who pay an annual official member fee, obtaining the operation code for the advance payment of the annual fee, which for our official members is 25 euros for those who are already 31 years old, and 12.5 euros for those who are under 31, which is paid through this component, at this link (choose based on your age and click on the respective category):

https://free.directdemocracys.org/register/membership

After payment, the official representative verifies, via a confidential direct support form, whether the transaction code is valid and registered to the invited person.

After verifying the annual fee paid, you are identified by our official representative using one of two methods: via a video identity verification call on our platforms (which must be recorded, encrypted, and sent to our dedicated security team). Or, by recording a video physical identity verification, which is performed outdoors in a suitable, private space. In this case, too, the physical identity verification must be recorded, encrypted, and sent to our dedicated security team.

Please note: In microgroups, only the official representative can verify the identity of invited members. However, if one of the invited members wishes to remain anonymous, they simply accept the invitation received from the official representative (with the QR code and unique registration link, which will directly connect the new official member to the official representative who invited them), stating that they will be identified by our special security group via video call. This verification number will be linked to a username unknown to our official representative, but not to their real details. This method allows those who wish to remain anonymous, and even invisible to those outside the group, as well as to those within the group.

A brief explanation. Our micro-group activities take place both in person (always documenting and recording everything) and online on our platforms (always documenting and recording everything). For in-person activities, events are created on our platforms, with authorization numbers and numerous protection and security measures based on very detailed rules. We obtain anonymous, yet authenticated, identification codes for everyone via our digitally signed forms. Therefore, all persons authorized to participate in the various events can remain completely anonymous, while still ensuring exceptional security measures.

Please note: this is very important. During the micro-group phase, only higher user levels can be requested, initially only official members. Subsequently, once at least 31 official members have been found and the micro-group has become an official organization, both in-person and online activities will be possible within the official organization. This will also include our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, who will be paying the annual fee, which is half the cost of official members.

Another very important rule: all our in-person activities are open to only our users and official members, with verified and guaranteed identities. On our platforms, once the micro-group has become an official organization, separate groups may be created, linked to the official organization (initial micro-group, with at least 31 official members) for lower-level user types, and even, if requested and approved by our national organizations (based on implementing rules, comprehensive methodologies, and detailed instructions), for free user types as well.

A useful tip to prevent any possible errors and problems.

Always abide by all the rules, never cheat. We know that not everyone is trustworthy, but we have every means to continuously verify everyone's compliance with all our rules. A brief example: if, at an in-person meeting reserved for our official members (with a printed individual authorization, or on the phone for the respective in-person event), our official representatives from the special security group find people who are not our official members, or who lack authorization, all those responsible will be punished according to our disciplinary regulations. We know that other systems don't have similar security measures, and for that reason, they are almost all unfair, unreliable, unsafe, and failing, but in DirectDemocracyS, there's no room for cheating; you can only follow the rules, which are the same for everyone.

Many people ask us what activities will take place in the microgroups/official organizations . There are numerous informational articles, both public and private, reserved for various types of users, which explain in detail the many activities that will take place both in the microgroups and, with greater potential, in our official organizations (microgroups with at least 31 official members). We encourage you to carefully study the respective informational articles. Many people ask us especially about our political activities, the selection of candidates for political representatives, the campaigns for our closed online primaries, and the conduct of the respective closed online primaries. For all our official members, the link that explains very well the process of our online primaries is this (visible only to our official members after logging in to the website):

 https://free.directdemocracys.org/we/1-we-rules/primary-elections

Virtually every activity, every decision, and every discussion will be managed and controlled, in their respective geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral areas, by our official representative, our micro-group, and above all, our official organization.

Each of our micro-groups and official organizations will expand outward like wildfire, with the creation of their own official members (authorized by our national organizations), new profiles of official representatives, who will create other micro-groups and other official organizations, connected by the official members present in two or more micro-groups and official organizations, which will act as human bridges of communication, collaboration, and mutual verification. By uniting, the various micro-groups and official organizations, in urban and rural areas with up to 1,000 inhabitants, will create our own local groups and organizations, from the smallest and with fewer inhabitants to the largest, integrating with our existing and operational local organizations, as well as with our national, continental, and international ones.

After all these various phases, which will require a great deal of time and a great deal of hard, complicated work on the part of all our users, we will finally be able to have global coverage, with various activities of all kinds, political, and for those who want it, business, and joint investments.

Our advice is always to join us as soon as possible, so you can immediately begin accumulating the necessary points, allowing you to carry out many important activities, in roles of greater responsibility, and with greater potential.

We repeat it.

If you share our values of true democracy, security, and meritocracy, now is the right time to join. Early adopters will have greater opportunities to actively contribute and assume leadership roles.

This news was created and distributed in accordance with our core communication rules, which have long been known to those within DirectDemocracyS. It was previewed on our platforms, and will subsequently be previewed externally on our official channels on traditional social networks, on other websites by our official representatives, and subsequently to our media partners who may publish it based on our authorizations.

All these rules are very important, important, moderately important, or implementing, depending on the type of voting performed, or the methodology used to make them legal, recognized, and binding for the entire system.

Rules on personal profiles and business sites.

All types of users can join us by registering and creating a personal profile only on our free website, after carefully reading the article that explains in detail how to fill out the registration form.

Attention: if you join us to be part of a micro-group, or if you have been invited to join us, in person (via QR code), by email (via registration link and related QR code), or by online invitation (via a registration link), even by being directly part of one of our micro-groups, NEVER USE the generic registration form, valid for all new users, valid for registering at any time, for anyone, but which will not put you in direct connection (as a friend in the social area of our platforms, which corresponds to being friends, or contacts on traditional social networks), therefore use only and exclusively the QR codes, and unique links, of our official representatives, who invite you.

If you have not been invited by one of our official representatives, you can simply carefully read the instructions for completing the registration form at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/activity-rules/registration-rules/registration-form

If you want a free user experience, which will never cost you a cent, with no obligation to be present, and no mandatory activities (except those mandatory for anyone who accesses our website for the first time after you have been activated), simply go directly to the registration form link and fill it out honestly (if you wish, use a nickname as your username to remain completely anonymous), directly at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/register

If you want to be a higher user category, you must request an official invitation by writing a brief introduction about yourself (don't forget to include your primary country, where you live at least 6 months a year, or where you have the right to vote, and possibly run for office), at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/infos-contacts/i-want-to-be-invited

Please write in the form in any language , as it will be handled by our national or local teams depending on your primary country.

You will receive all instructions via email. We recommend always providing a personal phone number. If you accidentally misspell your email address, we can text you to contact you (this isn't mandatory, but it's recommended).

Free users can access only the reserved areas for their respective user type, only on our official website, and on a very few other continuously updated websites, always with the ending: directdemocracys.org.

Users of the lower user categories can access the areas reserved for each of the lower user categories, on our free website, and a few other continuously updated websites, and based on certain requirements, also on our access website, at the link that will be communicated to you, and which changes frequently, for obvious security reasons.

Higher user levels can access virtually all of our websites, with the exception of those reserved for administrators, super administrators, and guarantors. They can view and access the areas reserved for each user level and can perform activities on the free website, the login website, the official website, and many other websites on our platforms.

Please note: each visitor who wishes to join us chooses user types based on availability on our registration form. For those who are reluctant to pay an annual fee, or are unable to do so, we recommend choosing the free user type, which is free and never will be, or a lower level user type (which offers you more potential but requires an annual fee of just a few euros per year). Even with the free level, you can enjoy a wide range of activities with us, and you'll receive the initial 25 points we give to all our new users immediately upon activation, without any preferences. You can decide at any time to request, and if you meet all the requirements, obtain, a higher level user type, which will give you greater potential and more activities to enjoy with us.

Differentiating information and access doesn't create privileges, but rather ensures security, reliability, and progressive system growth. Each level has access to what it needs to operate properly, while trust and accountability increase over time.

Here are the potential benefits of the free user type:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/free-users

Here are the potentials of the lower user types:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/potential-for-lower-user-types

Here are the potentials of the higher user types:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/potential-for-superiors-user-types

Here is some information about our hierarchies:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/our-hierarchies

Here's some information about our annual fees, based on your age:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/register/membership

We don't discriminate against anyone, but our trust is earned over time, based on the points accumulated individually and in groups. Therefore, as individuals, free, lower-tier, and higher-tier users are identical to us in terms of rights and obligations. Their potential, the type of information received (more detailed for higher-tier users), and the access areas on our platforms vary. With free, lower-tier, and higher-tier users, we value the category, and certainly not the individuals, whom we respect and value equally.

Login credentials for our various platform websites. Let's clarify some details.

To implement adequate security measures, we have not unified access. Essentially, anyone joining us, regardless of user type, registers according to our rules, first on our free website, where they will be activated and complete all initial activities. Depending on their user type, they will be able to access many of our other websites, using the same login credentials—usually the same username and password. If you are informed that you will also be able to access our other websites, please consider the following rules and helpful tips.

Almost all of our websites require a username and password for login, linked to a personal email address, a personal phone number, a unique personal identification code, and various unique authorization codes that will protect you from any potential problems. There are numerous other security and account protection measures, some of which are mandatory upon first login: such as setting up two-factor authentication (mandatory for everyone to prevent others from accessing your data or logging in under your name), personal settings (determined directly by you) regarding your personal data (if, with whom, when, and what data you can make public, if you want it all hidden, and to be invisible both abroad and within our platforms), and you will have to decide on each of our websites how you would like to receive notifications. We recommend not receiving notifications on your phone, and receiving only the most important ones via email. To do this, set up system notifications only, which will notify you of the latest news on activities and groups you participate in only when you log in.

If you have access to some of our websites, you can log in with the same username and password you chose on the free site via the registration form. Do not share your username or password with any human or machine. You must enter them exclusively on the login form to access the various websites. (Don't forget to click Login after entering your login credentials to access our reserved areas.)

Typically, all our platform databases are updated daily, with their respective login details encrypted and invisible to anyone, human or machine. Therefore, immediate access to our other websites, even for our higher-level users, is not automatic; it may take up to 24 hours to provide you with all the features and access you are entitled to, based on your authorizations.

Here are some explanations of the various main websites of our platform:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/free-access-official

and this:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/our-websites-potential

We've seen that the free website coordinates all your credentials. But what happens if you forget your username or password on one or all of our websites? The only way to find out your username is to use the instructions and our fully automated, no-human-intervention system for recovering your credentials, depending on what you've lost. If you don't know your username, you'll need to follow a process that will notify you by email or text message. Your username will be sent to your email address (via a text message to your personal email address) or to your personal phone number (if linked to your email address). If you forget your password, you won't receive a text message with your password, because no human, or any of our systems, knows your login password. However, you can reset it automatically, without human intervention, using a unique link sent to your email address or phone number. We typically use the unique link sent via email for password recovery, and you can get a new password. At this point, you have two options to coordinate your username and password on all other websites: wait about 24 hours, and your free site username and password will work on all the websites you're authorized to access. Alternatively, if you're in a hurry, reset your password on each of them (only on those where this procedure is authorized; on others, you'll have to wait for the login credentials to update, usually about 24 hours). Don't worry: the system is secure, but recovery is simple and completely automated. All the information and links you need to recover your login credentials can be found at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/for-registered-users/recover-account

certain websites on our platforms cannot use the same login credentials as the free site. Some require a new registration based on authorizations and activation codes. Many of our websites require access by entering your email address instead of your username, while others require codes. Each of our websites has different rules for recovering login credentials, often very strict and detailed, including verification via video call or in-person verification by our official representatives.

We remind you that by changing your login credentials and various email addresses on the free website, within approximately 24 hours they will be changed on all the websites of our platforms, which have the same login credentials, connected to the free website, and not on all the others.

A novelty that simplifies.

We have a new feature that makes it easier for all types of users, including free users, to submit contact forms by accessing our contact website at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

We no longer perform any verification to prove that you are human for those who want to submit a contact form, based on their needs.

After logging in to the website, simply find the contact form that best suits your needs, fill it out, and submit it. Furthermore, as you know, you don't have to enter your email address to receive our responses; the system automatically enters it in the email address field. We ask that you do not have our responses sent or redirected to other email addresses. Instead, use only your personal email address, which you provided on the initial registration form. You can change it on the free website in our social media area, but only for very valid reasons and only if absolutely necessary, and of course, after logging in.

We hope this information is useful to you and thank you for your cooperation.

Other useful information:

Here's how we guarantee anonymity:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/anonymity

Here is a list of what you should never do in our system:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/what-you-should-never-do