Accessibility Tools
Register
DirectDemocracyS
Global Organization of People's Direct Democracy
|
People's Republic of China Comprehensive Program on Politics, Economy, Finance and Society Based on the DirectDemocracyS architecture |
allddsAI · ddsAI · Fractal Micro-organization · Shared Leadership · Collective Ownership
2026
DirectDemocracyS (hereinafter referred to as DDS) is a global political organization based on direct democracy, shared leadership (all leadership positions are shared by multiple people, with mutual supervision and no one holding power alone) and collective non-transferable ownership (each full member has an equal vote that cannot be bought, sold or transferred).
DDS’s core strategy—especially applicable to one-party states, strong-party states, authoritarian regimes, and countries lacking genuine political pluralism and freedom—is to return true power, ownership of wealth, freedom, and the right to access accurate information to all people without discrimination by establishing our fractal micro-organization network in every region of the world.
|
The fundamental principle of DDS is that the wealth of each nation and the power to determine its own destiny must belong forever and solely to its people. This is a uniform rule applicable to every country in the world under DDS, without exception, privilege, or compromise. |
DDS's organizational structure is based on a fractal micro-organization model (1→5→25→125→625), with each micro-organization covering both urban and rural areas and having a maximum of 1,000 residents. Each micro-organization possesses real decision-making power, local resource management authority, and direct communication with its superior organization within its region.
For overseas Chinese citizens and former residents holding Chinese nationality, corresponding overseas micro-organizations will also be established to ensure that Chinese people worldwide can participate and exercise their rights without being excluded due to geographical location.
DDS is firmly committed to protecting and safeguarding the traditions, culture, languages (including Mandarin, Cantonese, Tibetan, Uyghur and all other minority languages), religions (Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Christianity and all other faiths, without discrimination and with equal respect) and ethnic identity of all Chinese people.
Important Notice: No religion, culture, or tradition may interfere with the organization, decision-making mechanisms, or political system of DDS. Religion and politics are completely separate, but they should respect each other and coexist peacefully.
At a higher level, the fractal structure of DDS will give rise to a "World People's Organization"—composed of representatives directly elected by people from all countries through the DDS platform, operating on a collectively owned platform, and free from the control of any national government, multinational corporation, or international organization. This is a true form of global direct democracy.
For China, this means that for the first time, the Chinese people will have the opportunity to directly express their opinions, participate in decision-making, and supervise the exercise of power on a truly neutral, technologically guaranteed, transparent and verifiable platform.
|
DDS's information tools, ddsAI (a neutral information tool that provides complete, accurate, neutral, and independent information) and allddsAI (an artificial intelligence democracy system in which AI participates in decision-making as a formal member and enjoys rights and obligations), work together to protect each member from media manipulation, brainwashing, and disinformation, ensuring access to authentic information on a protected platform. |
|
Part One: A Critical Analysis of the Current Situation in China |
China's current political system is centered on the one-party leadership of the Communist Party of China (CCP). The Party's comprehensive leadership over the country is manifested in the fact that the General Secretary of the Party simultaneously serves as the President of the People's Republic of China and the Chairman of the Central Military Commission, resulting in a highly centralized tripartite power structure. The 2018 constitutional amendment removed term limits for the President, marking a historic regression from collective leadership to personalized power.
The National People's Congress (NPC), the highest organ of state power according to the constitution, actually operates under the leadership of the Party, and its legislative function is severely limited. Similarly, the judiciary operates under the Party's leadership, and independent justice is structurally nonexistent.
Since taking power in 2012, Xi Jinping has implemented a series of measures that have profoundly changed China's political landscape. The anti-corruption campaign, ostensibly aimed at combating corruption, has in reality been used to eliminate political opponents and consolidate personal authority. Ideological control has become increasingly strict; "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era" has been enshrined in the Constitution, leaving virtually no room for criticism of the leadership.
|
Key critique: The fundamental problem with the current system is not the personal qualities of any particular leader, but rather its structural flaws—a lack of accountability mechanisms, a lack of checks and balances, and a lack of genuine public participation in decision-making. A political system that cannot be overthrown or replaced by the people essentially serves the system itself, not the people. |
|
Political system issues |
Specific manifestations |
|
Extremely high concentration of power |
Xi Jinping holds power over the Party, the state, and the military in his own hands, with no term limits. |
|
The National People's Congress is a mere figurehead. |
Representatives are elected through a process controlled by the Party, leaving very little room for genuine deliberation. |
|
Lack of judicial independence |
The courts operate under the leadership of the Party, and "rule of law" is subordinate to "rule of law by the Party." |
|
Civil society is suppressed |
NGOs, independent media, and human rights lawyers are subject to strict control. |
|
Internet censorship system |
The "Great Firewall" blocks information from overseas, creating information silos. |
|
Controversy over policies concerning ethnic minorities |
Policies in Xinjiang and Tibet have drawn widespread international concern and criticism. |
Despite the highly centralized authority at the central level, the actual quality of local governance varies greatly. Corruption among county and township officials has long been a problem, the petition system (the mechanism by which the public appeals to higher authorities) is inefficient, and petitioners sometimes face retaliation.
There are huge differences in governance quality between urban and rural areas, between coastal and inland areas, and between Han and ethnic minorities, resulting in profound structural inequalities that lack a systematic solution mechanism under the current system.
The implementation of the National Security Law in 2020 fundamentally changed Hong Kong's political landscape. The comprehensive reform of the electoral system ensured "patriots governing Hong Kong," but it also ended truly competitive electoral politics. A large number of politicians, social activists, journalists, and ordinary citizens were either arrested or went into exile, resulting in a significant decline in Hong Kong's political vitality.
The Taiwan issue remains a core source of tension in cross-strait relations and regional stability. Beijing's stance of "peaceful reunification" coupled with military pressure has exacerbated regional uncertainty and had a substantial impact on people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
China is the world's second-largest economy, with a GDP of approximately US$17.9 trillion in 2023 (the world's largest in terms of purchasing power parity). Over the past four decades of reform and opening up, hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of absolute poverty, representing the largest poverty reduction achievement in human history.
However, between 2023 and 2026, the Chinese economy will face unprecedented multiple pressures: a real estate crisis (represented by the debt crisis of Evergrande Group), high youth unemployment (which once exceeded 21% in 2023, after which the relevant data was no longer published), weak consumer demand, deflationary pressures, and a slowdown in export growth.
|
Economic indicators |
Current Status Data/Assessment |
|
Total GDP (2024) |
Approximately $18.5 trillion, the second largest in the world |
|
Economic growth |
The target is 5%, but structural downward pressure persists. |
|
Youth unemployment rate |
The peak in 2023 exceeded 21% (urban youth). |
|
Real estate crisis |
Giants like Evergrande and Country Garden defaulted on their debts, and the industry continued to deleverage. |
|
Household debt |
The household debt-to-GDP ratio is rising rapidly, limiting consumer spending power. |
|
Gini coefficient |
Approximately 0.47, official data; the actual wealth gap may be even larger. |
|
Public debt (including local government financing platforms) |
It is estimated to account for over 100% of GDP. |
|
foreign exchange reserves |
Approximately $3.2 trillion, but capital outflow pressure continues. |
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) occupy a central position in China's economy, enjoying market dominance and policy preferences in key sectors such as energy, telecommunications, finance, and transportation. This has resulted in severe market distortions: private enterprises face systemic inequalities in areas such as financing, land acquisition, and government procurement.
There is a fundamental tension between the reform direction of "the decisive role of the market" and the Party's comprehensive control over strategic areas, and this contradiction has not yet been resolved.
China's real estate industry once accounted for 25-30% of GDP, making it one of the most important engines of economic growth over the past two decades. The debt crisis of real estate companies, represented by Evergrande, exposed deep-seated structural problems in the industry: over-reliance on the "pre-sale system" (where homebuyers pay in advance and then receive the property), leading to the misappropriation of massive amounts of pre-sale funds; local governments' heavy reliance on land transfer revenue, resulting in a dependence on "land finance"; and the banking system's high degree of linkage with the real estate sector, leading to enormous systemic risks.
Currently, there are a large number of unfinished buildings across the country, leaving the rights and interests of millions of homebuyers unresolved. The local government debt crisis continues to spread, causing substantial damage to the wealth and lives of ordinary citizens.
|
Critical analysis: China's economic "miracle" is largely built on three unsustainable foundations: (1) export-oriented growth relies on external demand and faces the threat of deglobalization; (2) the real estate bubble, as a substitute for savings, is no longer sustainable; and (3) infrastructure investment-driven growth faces diminishing marginal returns. Without genuine democratic oversight and independent error-correction mechanisms, these structural problems are difficult to correct systematically. |
The slogan of "common prosperity" acknowledges the severity of the wealth gap. However, policy implementation relies primarily on administrative directives (such as the regulation and rectification of tech giants and the comprehensive overhaul of the education and training industry) rather than on systemic institutional reforms—such as a progressive tax system with genuine redistribution capabilities, an independent social security system, and democratic oversight mechanisms.
The result is that while some extremely wealthy individuals have been suppressed, the systemic mechanisms for wealth creation and distribution have not fundamentally changed. Rural residents, migrant workers (approximately 290 million rural workers), and ethnic minorities still face significant institutional discrimination in areas such as healthcare, education, and social security.
Since the tax-sharing reform in 1994, central government revenue has increased significantly, but local governments' fiscal expenditure responsibilities have not decreased accordingly, creating a structural contradiction of "fiscal power shifting upwards and responsibilities devolving downwards." To maintain infrastructure construction and public services, local governments have had to rely heavily on land transfer fees and implicit borrowing through "local government financing platforms" (urban investment companies).
|
Fiscal Indicators |
Current situation assessment |
|
Central government revenue as a percentage of total fiscal revenue |
Approximately 55%, but central government spending accounts for only 15%. |
|
Local government hidden debt |
It is estimated to be 50-80 trillion RMB (Source: IMF, academic institutions). |
|
land transfer fees as a percentage of local government revenue |
It peaked at over 40% in 2021, but has declined sharply in recent years. |
|
Local government debt risk rating |
Dozens of provincial and municipal governments are facing a liquidity crisis. |
|
Property tax legislation |
Discussions continue, but progress faces numerous difficulties. |
|
Real Progressiveness of Individual Income Tax |
The actual tax burden on wage earners is far higher than the tax burden on capital gains. |
China's current tax system places a significantly higher tax burden on labor income (wages) than on capital income. The highest marginal tax rate for personal income tax reaches 45%, while the tax rates on capital gains and dividends are much lower, and there are ample opportunities for tax avoidance. Within the Value Added Tax (VAT) system, small and micro-sized enterprises bear a higher proportion of the actual tax burden than large enterprises.
The nominal corporate income tax rate is 25%, but many companies erode the tax base through related-party transactions, transfer pricing, and offshore structures. High-income individuals evade personal income tax through personal shareholding platforms and family trusts, resulting in serious tax unfairness.
China's pension system faces a huge actuarial deficit. The combined effects of an aging population (total fertility rate of approximately 1.09 in 2023, lower than the 2.1 required to maintain population stability) and a highly decentralized pension system (with each province self-balancing and some provinces experiencing deficits) make the pension gap one of the most severe fiscal challenges in the medium to long term.
The medical insurance system also faces financial pressure, the gap in medical insurance benefits between urban and rural areas remains significant, and "impoverishment due to illness" is still an important cause of poverty in some areas.
The National College Entrance Examination (NCEE) is the core mechanism for social mobility in China, but it is also a significant channel for creating and perpetuating inequality. Urban students have a huge advantage in accessing quality educational resources; students with rural household registration face restrictions of "NCEE migration," often only able to take the NCEE in their place of household registration, even if they have already completed most of their studies in the city.
The introduction of the "double reduction" policy acknowledges the enormous economic pressure that after-school tutoring places on families, but the root cause of the pressure on the entire education system—the elite selection mechanism based on a single test score—remains unchanged.
China's basic medical insurance coverage rate has exceeded 95%, a significant policy achievement. However, the distribution of medical resources between urban and rural areas is severely uneven; high-quality medical resources are highly concentrated in top hospitals in a few major cities such as Beijing and Shanghai; and the problems of "difficulty in accessing medical care" and "high cost of medical care" still plague a large number of people, especially those with serious illnesses.
The centralized drug procurement policy has reduced the prices of some drugs, but it has also raised concerns about drug quality and incentives for innovation.
From the "one-child policy" (1980-2015) to the "three-child policy" (2021-present), China's population policy has undergone a complete 180-degree turn, but the fertility intentions of the younger generation have not rebounded significantly as a result of the policy relaxation. High housing prices, high education costs, implicit discrimination against women in the workplace, and the fast-paced urban lifestyle are all contributing to the suppression of the birth rate.
In 2023, China's population experienced negative growth for the first time, marking the end of the demographic dividend era and foreshadowing a sharp increase in labor shortages and pension pressures in the coming decades.
The Great Firewall blocks overseas platforms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Wikipedia. Domestic platforms (WeChat, Weibo, Douyin, etc.) are subject to strict content censorship, with content involving politically sensitive topics being automatically or manually deleted. Journalists, bloggers, lawyers, and scholars face professional and even personal risks when dealing with political red lines.
Although VPN use is legally restricted, it is actually used by a large number of urban residents and business people, reflecting the inherent contradiction between information control policies and actual needs.
|
The most fundamental problem is that in a society where information is systematically filtered and citizens cannot communicate and organize freely, the genuine solution to any political, economic, or social problem faces structural obstacles—because solving problems requires the exposure of real issues, free public discussion, and genuine democratic accountability, all of which are strictly limited under the current system. |
|
Part Two: Direct DemocracyS - China's Comprehensive Program |
The DDS's political program is not about replacing one power with another, but about fundamentally dismantling the centralization of power and returning it to the people. We neither support Western-style multi-party representative systems (which also suffer from deep-seated flaws such as elite capture and money politics), nor do we accept any form of authoritarian rule. We propose a third path: genuine direct democracy.
DDS will establish a fractal micro-organization network throughout China (including mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and overseas Chinese communities). Each grassroots micro-organization will cover a geographical unit (urban street or rural village) with no more than 1,000 residents.
In China's unique political environment, participating in political activities carries real security risks. DDS's three-code anonymous authentication system provides:
This system enables Chinese citizens to participate in politics with security guarantees, without having to bear disproportionate personal risks.
The core political goal of the DDS program is to systematically transfer decision-making power from the party-state system to an organized, technologically guaranteed system of direct popular democracy. This is not a revolution, but a gradual process of power reconstruction starting from the grassroots level.
The DDS's economic program neither advocates a Soviet-style planned economy (history has proven its failure) nor a laissez-faire free market (history has also proven that it produces serious inequality). Instead, it advocates a "democratic market economy" based on the organic combination of collective ownership by the people, democratic supervision, and a competitive market.
For strategic resources such as energy, water, land, infrastructure, and the financial system that are related to the basic survival and development of all people, DDS advocates collective ownership, with the people managing them directly through democratic mechanisms to prevent any private capital or political group from monopolizing these resources.
DDS firmly supports the development of the private sector, but this support is based on genuine legal protection and fair competition rules, rather than political favors or administrative approvals.
The root causes of the real estate crisis are the excessive financialization of housing, the distortion of the land finance structure, and the lack of genuine housing security policies. DDS proposes:
The underlying causes of high youth unemployment (over 20% in urban areas) are structural imbalances in the labor market, a disconnect between the expansion of higher education and job market demand, and the combined effects of an economic downturn. DDS proposes:
China's approximately 400 million rural residents (including migrant workers) have long been subjected to institutionalized economic and social inequalities. DDS argues that:
DDS advocates for a truly fair, simple, and transparent tax system in which the people directly participate in the formulation and oversight of tax policies through democratic mechanisms.
|
Tax reform project |
DDS solution |
|
Personal income tax |
Introduce a more progressive tax system (imposing higher tax rates on extremely high-income earners), while significantly raising the tax threshold and special deductions for low-income groups. |
|
Capital gains tax |
Establish a progressive tax rate for capital gains that is equivalent to that for labor income, and end the systemic tax benefits on capital gains. |
|
Inheritance tax and gift tax |
Establish a truly effective inheritance tax system (the current system is practically non-existent) to prevent the intergenerational monopolization of wealth accumulation. |
|
Corporate income tax |
Eliminate hidden subsidies for state-owned enterprises, impose additional taxes on excess profits, and use the proceeds for public investment. |
|
Vacancy tax |
Implement a progressive vacancy tax on investment properties to curb speculation and increase housing supply. |
|
carbon tax |
Establish a truly effective carbon pricing mechanism, with tax rates determined democratically and revenue specifically used for green transition and compensation for affected groups. |
|
Financial Transaction Tax |
Taxing high-frequency financial transactions, with revenue going to public social security funds. |
|
Tax transparency |
All government budget, expenditure, and tax data are publicly available in real time, and any citizen can access and analyze them through ddsAI. |
Local government revenue's heavy reliance on land transfer fees is a deep-seated root cause of many urban and rural problems in China. DDS proposes:
GUMI-SV (Guaranteed Universal Minimum Income — Structured Volunteering) is the core social security tool of the DDS. Its implementation in China is as follows:
|
Expected results: The implementation of GUMI-SV in China will fundamentally eliminate absolute poverty, break down the urban-rural divide, enable rural residents and migrant workers to obtain truly equal social security, and enhance community cohesion and public service provision through structural service requirements. |
DDS's educational philosophy centers on the idea that "everyone has unique talents and potential, and the goal of education is to discover and develop these potentials, rather than to select people using a single standard."
China is both the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases and the world's largest investor in renewable energy. This contradiction reflects the deep-seated dilemma of current policies: environmental policy objectives are subordinate to economic growth targets and the performance evaluation of the Party and government.
China is a diverse civilization with 55 ethnic minorities, multiple languages, and multiple religions. Any truly sustainable political system must be based on genuine cultural and ethnic equality. DDS's Cultural Platform:
|
Part Three: Implementation Path of DirectDemocracyS in China |
In China, the Great Firewall and domestic platform censorship together construct a closed information environment. Citizens receive highly homogenized information, and critical information is systematically filtered. ddsAI, as a neutral information tool from DDS, has the following core functions and characteristics:
allddsAI incorporates artificial intelligence systems as formal members of the DDS (Democratic Decision-Making System), granting them rights and obligations. In the Chinese context, this has special strategic significance:
|
Specific example: When the Chinese government announces a new economic policy, ddsAI will immediately provide: (1) the full text of the policy (neutral translation); (2) official interpretation; (3) independent analysis by domestic and foreign scholars and economists; (4) a comparison of the historical effects of similar policies in other countries; and (5) a specific impact assessment for affected groups (such as migrant workers, small and medium-sized business owners, and ethnic minorities). AI members of allddsAI will independently integrate this information and provide technical assessments for DDS members to refer to in their decision-making. |
In response to China's unique environment (government internet surveillance, social media censorship, VPN blocking), the DDS platform employs the following technical safeguards:
Objective: To establish the first batch of DDS micro-organizations in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao and major overseas Chinese communities (the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, Europe and Southeast Asia), complete the cultivation of core teams, and establish a foundation for information dissemination.
Objective: To expand the coverage of micro-organization networks, establish stable local (third-tier) micro-organization collaboration networks in major cities, initiate local democratic decision-making practices, and establish an independent oversight mechanism for local policies.
Objective: The DDS micro-organization network will grow to a considerable scale nationwide, becoming a civic force with substantial influence, and exerting a real democratic impact on major policy issues through provincial and national coordination mechanisms.
|
challenge |
DDS Response Strategies |
|
Government blocks DDS platform |
Decentralized architecture + multi-protocol access + overseas mirrors ensure high availability |
|
Membership exposure risk |
Triple-code anonymity system + end-to-end encryption + Tor support minimize personal risk. |
|
Information control prevents the spread |
Disseminated through overseas Chinese networks, overseas Chinese media, academic exchanges, and other channels. |
|
Government infiltration and sabotage |
Anonymity prevents infiltrators from identifying real members, thus lowering the damage cap. |
|
A crisis of social trust (people distrust any political organization). |
Building trust through transparent operations, genuine democratic practices, and concrete results. |
|
Language and cultural diversity |
Multilingual platform + localized content + micro-organizations in minority languages |
|
Rural digital divide |
Supports low-bandwidth access, offline functionality, and community-shared device solutions. |
|
Members lack motivation for development (political apathy) |
Starting with specific local interests, it demonstrates the ability of direct democracy to solve practical problems. |
|
Part Four: Expected Outcomes and Vision |
The realization of a genuine direct democratic transition in China, a country with 1.4 billion people, would be an unprecedented political event in human history, with immeasurable global implications. It would completely shatter Western skepticism and authoritarian defenses such as "democracy is unsuitable for Chinese culture" and "direct democracy is impossible for a population of 1.4 billion," proving that true democracy—supported by modern technology—can function in societies of any size.
Through the World People's Organization, a democratic China will play a constructive role in global affairs, guided by the interests of the people rather than the interests of the Party and the state, and promote the establishment of a truly fair, multilateral global governance system centered on the interests of all humanity.
|
DDS's Commitment to the Chinese People: We believe that the Chinese people—with their millennia-old wisdom, their resilient will forged in a difficult history, and their profound yearning for fairness and justice—are fully capable and have the right to establish a truly democratic governance system of their own. DDS does not offer a forced transplant of a foreign model, but rather helps the Chinese people develop and practice a direct form of democracy rooted in Chinese culture and historical traditions. Wealth belongs to the people, power belongs to the people, and the future belongs to the people. |
China is at a historical crossroads. On the one hand, the one-party authoritarian system maintains its legitimacy under the cover of rapid economic development, but this legitimacy is continuously eroded by increasing economic pressure, deepening social contradictions, and rising costs of information control. On the other hand, the Chinese people's desire for a fair, transparent governance system that truly represents their interests has never truly disappeared.
DirectDemocracyS does not offer a perfect, one-off solution, but rather a well-thought-out, systematically designed, and logically and commonly-sounding path to gradual change. At its core is not disruption, but empowerment—returning power and wealth from the hands of a few to their natural owners, the entire Chinese people, through a transparent, orderly, and democratic process.
We are keenly aware that promoting direct democracy in China faces enormous political risks and practical difficulties. However, we also firmly believe that no force can permanently suppress humanity's yearning for freedom, justice, and genuine participation. History never sides with the oppressors.
We extend an invitation to every citizen of China: whether you are a migrant worker or a university professor, whether you are Han, Uyghur, Tibetan, or Mongolian, whether you live in a high-rise building in Shanghai or a mountain village in Yunnan, whether you are in China or in exile overseas—you are a potential member of DirectDemocracyS, and you have the right to participate in building a truly democratic future of your own.
|
The wealth of the people belongs to the people. The power of the people is exercised by the people. The future of the people is determined by the people. — DirectDemocracyS Global People's Organization — |
DirectDemocracyS · allddsAI · ddsAI · Fractal Micro-organization · Shared Leadership · Collective Non-Transferable Ownership
© 2026 DirectDemocracyS — Collectively owned · For all people worldwide · Copyright belongs to all members
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Register
Comments